It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MagesticEsoteric
reply to post by Daedal
So, if I understand this correctly, they are ticked off because the companies that advertise and support the networks aren't able to reach the CONSUMERS through commercials.
If we are not forced to see all of the new trinkets and toys and products that we are supposed to BUY to make us happy and content....the big corporations could potentially be losing profits.
If my assumptions are wrong...someone please enlighten me.
Otherwise, what a crock!
edit on 27-5-2012 by MagesticEsoteric because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by buddha
So if I dont watch the adverts.
I break the law?
No more going to toilet at the adverts!
has any one read the book, Solaris - Lem Stanislaw - 1961?
in it some one goes through just this same thing.
and he advertises the Box on TV (in the book).
they try to stop him and lose.
Originally posted by babybunnies
They're claiming that Dish Network is "rebroadcasting" programming by giving cx's the ability to skip commercials.
However, the actual content of the TV program actually isn't changing, just the content of the commercials.
I remember when Hollywood studios took SONY to court for the VCR when this came out too because they thought it was copyright infringement.
Originally posted by Daedal
"The networks are accusing Dish of "inducing" copyright infringement. That's a legal theory first created in the record labels' case against peer-to-peer software maker Grokster. The problem for the networks is that a technology maker, service, or other middleman can't be held liable for inducing copyright infringement unless their customers are actually infringing. And that means the networks will have to convince a judge that people who record a TV show, and later decide to skip over the commercials during playback, are violating federal law."
Well I don't own one of these devices, but do know people who do, don't watch much television for that matter. Hopefully, the courts won't turn millions of American commercial-skippers into lawbreakers.
eff.org
Television networks are having a busy month trying to stamp out new TV-watching technology, including telling a court that skipping a commercial while watching a recorded show is illegal. Yesterday, Fox, NBC, and CBS all sued Dish Network over its digital video recorder with automatic commercial-skipping. The same networks, plus ABC, Univision, and PBS, are gearing up for a May 30 hearing in their cases against Aereo, a New York startup bringing local broadcast TV to the Internet. EFF and Public Knowledge filed an amicus brief supporting Aereo this week.
edit on 26-5-2012 by Daedal because: Edit
Originally posted by Aleister
reply to post by Daedal
People, just go down to your local thrift store and buy a few VCR machines (one to use, a couple for backup). There is nothing like an old VCR to tape a show and skip the commercials. Many machines come with slots for VCR and DVD's.
Originally posted by magma
Originally posted by Aleister
reply to post by Daedal
People, just go down to your local thrift store and buy a few VCR machines (one to use, a couple for backup). There is nothing like an old VCR to tape a show and skip the commercials. Many machines come with slots for VCR and DVD's.
But it is not in HD or 3D with 15.9 surround
They have invented hard disk recording recently. It is pretty amazing and means that you do not have to fast forward a tape. Plus tapes wear out after a while. Can you still even buy tapes?
good idea though
Originally posted by buddha
So do I have to watch adverts
even when I dont have a TV?
If they win this we are truly slaves.
next we will HAVE to buy things from them!!!
Originally posted by FeatherofMaat
While its a misnomer to say it is "illegal'" (it isn't a crime. This is what you capitalism lovers want. Have fun.