It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Under current law, raising children does not count toward the required "work activity" that must be performed by recipients of Temporary Assistance to Needy Families.
The Women's Option to Raise Kids (WORK) Act, a copy of which was provided to HuffPost in advance of its introduction, would allow mothers with children ages 3 and under to stay at home with their children and continue receiving benefits.
The act was inspired by the recent kerfuffle, in which the political establishment, from President Barack Obama to Mitt Romney, took great umbrage at the suggestion by Democratic strategist Hilary Rosen that Ann Romney had not "worked a day in her life."
"All moms are working moms," Mitt Romney responded.
If that's the case, then it's unfair to apply a different standard to low-income women, reasoned Rep. Pete Stark of California, a top Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee.
“I think we should take Mr. Romney at his most recent word and change our federal laws to recognize the importance and legitimacy of raising young children. That’s why I’ve introduced the WORK Act to provide low-income parents the option of staying home to raise young children without being pushed into poverty.”
Originally posted by Indigo5
reply to post by Indigo5
Rep. Peter Stark
“I think we should take Mr. Romney at his most recent word and change our federal laws to recognize the importance and legitimacy of raising young children. That’s why I’ve introduced the WORK Act to provide low-income parents the option of staying home to raise young children without being pushed into poverty.”
Anyone? Where is the indignant right wing shouting about how raising children is "work"?...which I agree with BTW. Shouldn't the GOP be rushing to support this bill?
Again...is it only "work" for the 1% of the 1% like Ann Romney to raise kids?
Originally posted by Justaposter
Isn't he pretty much discribing welfare?!
We can pretty it up all we want folks, but in a nut shell it is welfare..
Originally posted by Justaposter
Why focus on only the 'low income'? Seriously? no other segment of our socity worthy of staying home to raise children?
Only 58% of U.S. kids go to preschool compared with 98% in Iceland, 95% in Norway and 82% in Australia.
Compared with other developed countries, U.S. scored dead last is in the issue of paid maternity leave, Powers said. In the U.S., the typical family leave is 12 weeks compared with six months to a year in Europe, where mothers can bond with their babies and establish good breast-feeding practices.
Top 5 places for mothers:
1. Norway
2. Australia
3. Iceland
4. Sweden
5. Denmark
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by Indigo5
Don't be surprised that the conservatives on ATS will avoid this thread like the plague...
Originally posted by Indigo5
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by Indigo5
Don't be surprised that the conservatives on ATS will avoid this thread like the plague...
Geez...you were not kidding.
Under current law, raising children does not count toward the required "work activity" that must be performed by recipients of Temporary Assistance to Needy Families.
Originally posted by Justaposter
I am curious though, how many here posting on this topic actually have kids? How many that do, does your wife or SO stay home? Do you?
Originally posted by Justaposter
And I really think that we are kind of looking at this the wrong way.. maybe this isn't a fight between the haves and have nots..maybe this is really a fight on parenting?
Thoughts?