It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by timetothink
So if the Tianic can disappear ( as he put it) in say 100 to 200 years.....what would be left after 2000? Or more?
Originally posted by Rendier
While I agree that there is alot of pseudo-science going on, which is mostly because of lack of higher education (read: university level), dismissing a theory because there aren't any experts in the field agreeing or investigating it seems rather shallow.
For starters, as far as I'm aware, one does not become an archeologist/historical expert/... overnight. It takes years of education which ultimately shapes you into what the field conciders an expert. It's no secret that a certain bias comes with education, that bias being the acceptance of certain truths in your specific field of education.
If you study physics, you'll have to learn the flow of currents, how forces work and so on. Up to this day, we still can't explain alot of things (Read: string theory) meaning that our current model of physics is wrong/needs adjustments. Yet every current physicist has been educated using this as the very foundation. It requires out-of-the-box thinking to solve mysteries which are the foundation of your education, and not many people are capable of doing so.
On top of this, simply because these truths gets accepted during the education (Pyramids were related to the Pharaoh's and their after-life), trying to refute them after your education could cause a serious dent in your credibility amongst peers in your field of work, because all of them have too fallen under the same education. This is especially true with history, where there's already a fear of getting associated with certain ideas/theories as it could crush your future carreer.
I think alot of people have the idea that when people graduate from university/college, they become actively engaged in the shaping and evolution of their respective fields, which simply is not the case; the majority of people end up working the equivalent of a deskjob in their fields. (Take what you learn in school and apply it in a commercial situation) So the few people who do get the chance to have enough spare time, money and interest for "free" research are likely not too keen on risking their personal carreer following "out there"-theories, regardless of those theories offering a perfectly viable solution to problems in the current model.
Don't get me wrong, I, as much as you, would love for someone with a degree in ancient history come here and spew facts regarding the posted "evidence", but I will never dismiss a theory due to lack of support from high-players in the respective field.
Originally posted by bottleslingguy
this is more where I was going with that:
Originally posted by DonVoigt
It would be interesting to see if this is possible on some small scale replica in a labtatory so that the electricty output can be measured
Originally posted by Sinny
Sorry I haven't been around to keep this thread in logical check
Copper was the most common metal for everyday use in ancient Egypt. Copper in Egypt often contained natural arsenic. Therefore it was particularly hard. Copper ores were mined and melted in the eastern desert and in Sinai.
To anyone who disagrees that machines, or tools yet undisclosed to us, were used on the pyramids, I ask you to conduct your own experiment with hammers, chisels and whatever else the history books say they had, and see if you can produce the same ballistic evidence left on the stones.
Originally posted by bottleslingguy
reply to post by Bedlam
we really do believe we are at the top of the intellectual ladder don't we?
Originally posted by Sinny
reply to post by DavidWillts
Touche! From what I just read there, although I would much rather prefer to see a video of it in action to see how laborious it would be...
.also, this site talks of the copper pipes the Egyptians used, there's your missing metal components for any electrical device they could have used!
Originally posted by bottleslingguy
reply to post by Bedlam
we really do believe we are at the top of the intellectual ladder don't we?
Originally posted by Sinny
Does anyone actually know how long it takes for certain metals to degrade?