It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
We still are.
Originally posted by Plugin
Just a thought.
Lets say people where just animals for millions and millions of years.
Originally posted by Legion2024
600 years of hunting witches, Imagine where we would be now if those 600 years were more productive.edit on 14-3-2012 by Legion2024 because: (no reason given)
First we must realize we are not as advanced as we believe ourselves to be, history would seem to point at man having been advanced before only to lose it's knowledge to the depths of the ages after catastrophe man made or natural.
Originally posted by Buddha1098
reply to post by spaceg0at
Ancient egyptians likely had rudimentary forms of electricity.
Originally posted by Plugin
Just a thought.
Lets say people where just animals for millions and millions of years.
Then at some point, somehow, we got a consious or something that changed us? Or lets say, we didn't even had a language for millions of years? Maybe our progress started after we had a real language and even more important, a written language.
And that's not that old...
If not, it's basicly not possible that we stayed the same for millions of years, without any change really.
edit on 15-3-2012 by Plugin because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by zerotime
Religion held us back. And I'm not bashing religion just stating a fact. Religion is still fighting science tooth and nail on any modern advances.edit on 14-3-2012 by zerotime because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by stAtrill
Originally posted by chr0naut
Originally posted by CaptChaos
Advances have been actively held back and suppressed for almost a hundred years. We are being actively suppressed NOW.
I defy anyone to think of something truly new that has been invented since WW2. Even ONE thing, that is not just a refinement of existing tech.
Here's a few:
The science of genetics and recombinant DNA.
Spintronics,
Graphene, Fullerines and other allotropes of Carbon.
Magnetic monopoles,
Superconductivity, and its associated discoveries.
String theory, M theory and Brane theories,
Theoretical dark energy,
Hawking Radiation,
Memory Alloys,
Metamaterials and negative refractive index,
Space Travel,
Kevlar,
Graphite Polymers,
Lasers and Masers,
Nanotechnology,
Neuro-chemistry,
... as you imagine, I could easily go on for ages.
The overwhelming majority of that list are not inventions, just about every single one is either a discovery or an innovation. Some of them haven't even been observed, and some of them are now being shown to be erroneous. In the interest of being thorough, I will demonstrate this for you:
The science of genetics and recombinant DNA. - Discovery.
Spintronics, -Discovery. Nothing useful has come from this yet.
Graphene, Fullerines and other allotropes of Carbon. -Discovery, by definition.
Magnetic monopoles, -Again, discovery. Existed in nature beforehand (if this is shown to be true)
Superconductivity, and its associated discoveries. -You said it yourself.
String theory, M theory and Brane theories, -these are theories, not inventions. Nothing useful has been produced from them yet.
Theoretical dark energy, -Again, not an invention, and useless.
Hawking Radiation, -theory, useless
Memory Alloys, -innovation, they have been refining this one for the last 4 decades at least
Metamaterials and negative refractive index, -discovery. Existed in nature.
Space Travel, -Not an invention theory, or discovery. Shouldn't be on this list at all
Kevlar, -innovation. They had been iteratively improving plastic strength
Graphite Polymers, -Again, an innovation.
Lasers and Masers, -This may be the only invention on this whole list.
Nanotechnology, -Another discovery. Nothing useful has come of this yet
Neuro-chemistry, -This is still in the theoretical stages. Nothing useful blah blah blah....
Out of that whole list, Lasers may be the only real discovery. So no, you couldn't go on for ages. Lasers are quite possibly the only true invention that we have had. There may be a few more, but they have likely been lost to time.
Originally posted by mackey1224uk
Originally posted by chr0naut
Originally posted by zerotime
Religion held us back. And I'm not bashing religion just stating a fact. Religion is still fighting science tooth and nail on any modern advances.edit on 14-3-2012 by zerotime because: (no reason given)
I don't think there is less religion today. It has just moved around.
And many of the scientists, philosophers & technicians who ushered in this "age of knowledge" were, themselves, highly religious.
Perhaps it is a particular facet of religion which held us back but is now absent.
It is interesting to note that the Reformation preceded the change fairly closely (though, perhaps, not close enough to be a factor).
It was a nice try but I think that answer is too general and not actually historically justifiable.
Are you serious!
Have you ever heard of the word BLASPHEMY. Well, it was used by the Hierarchy in RELIGION, and it was very useful for hundreds of years. (Religion was to blame) along with all the scaremongering that science was the devil's work. They beat, burnt, drowned and even tortured people for being smart or something the dumb-asses in religion, didnt understand.
Us "common folk" werent allowed the knowledge of the so-called gods.
Originally posted by bjarneorn
reply to post by chr0naut
The answer to your question is about as simple, as the question is.
The answer is Verner von Braun.
The more complex answer is 9/11.
The relation between the two is, that people want to believe the official story of 9/11 and accept the protection of the few. In this concept, there has been stagnation in science ... because if you want security, it means that all changes must be stopped. So, people lived for thousands of years, wanting God to protect them from evil ... from change.
Verner von Braun, is who made NASA. He is the man who launched the vehicle into space, and made NASA what it is. When he died, NASA more or less died with him. Today NASA is nothing more than a bunch of jerks who are making a lot of nonsense, to tell us all that we are living in a stable world, instead of pressing for change and forward motion.
For a brief time, the Verner von Brauns of this world, had a chance of brillianse. As they did, over two thousand years ago ... but as it says in the legend.
Do not fret ... as it was before, so shall it be again.
Originally posted by Plugin
It doesn't really make sense; ''why''.
Only sense for me is the amount of people, somehow this line was flat for millions of years then since about the year ''0'', we see fast progress and the amount of people on earth. (except of course some ancient civilizations which have shown some advancements but vanished).
edit on 15-3-2012 by Plugin because: (no reason given)
Now my own theory is that kinda like with peak oil, we may have a peak human, which means at some point, the line which has gone upwards very fast in a very short time, may go down as well as fast at some point. This because it's not sustainable.edit on 15-3-2012 by Plugin because: (no reason given)