It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GringoViejo
You have no right to someone else's property, and if you try to support such ridiculous notions, you set a very dangerous precedent for everyone, including yourself.
If you have problems with rich people, who broke the law and hurt people on the way to getting, or to get this money, go after them.
Originally posted by charles1952
Actually, I have worse thoughts to add. Two, actually. The first is who is defending the Constitution? I'm not claiming that everyone is involved in one grand conspiracy, but, rather, which body or group is solidly committed to constitutional law, property rights, and rule by law? Nothing comes to mind. Not the President, or the Department of Justice. Maybe the Supreme Court, but we have managed to ignore federal district court rulings (Obamacare, gulf drilling). I don't know who the good guys are.
The second bad thought is who is attacking the Constitution? OWS is the current poster child. They are hoping for violence and a number of speakers and MSM types have called for it. The Muslims at home are suing for the state to accomodate their religious beliefs in ways that no other religion is allowed to.
Even here on ATS, the level of anger and inability to discuss issues only emphasizes the desire to overthrow our current Constitutional sytem. People on ATS are being advised to prepare for when TSHTF, but they can't see that they're the ones throwing it.
Originally posted by GringoViejo
What this really means is that you are limiting the amount of property (money) that someone can have, property which they earned.
Originally posted by GringoViejo
As long as your plan doesn't threaten the Constitution.
If your solutions jeopardize the building blocks of this country, then your solutions are not solutions at all, they are treason.
What am I talking about? Well as much as I hear "No leader, no agenda" being thrown around as if it changes the paper trail, I also hear proposals that would fundamentally change the fabric of our country in ways that would be incomprehensible to our founding fathers. I know not all of you are asking for this type of thing, so wipe the froth from your mouth before responding if you don't.
One example I've seen here on ATS is a proposed (global) cap on wealth. The proposal involves people being limited to earning a billion dollars, after that, they can't keep anymore. It gets put back into the system for "the good of the people."
Now, most of OWS would see this and go "Yeah! What's wrong with that? Nobody needs anymore than that anyways!"
What this really means is that you are limiting the amount of property (money) that someone can have, property which they earned. You have no right to someone else's property, and if you try to support such ridiculous notions, you set a very dangerous precedent for everyone, including yourself. Meaning that someday, someone may be able to come along and take what is yours, whether you agree or not.
I am here to say that these types of proposals will not stand, and you will not squander what our founding fathers gave us.
If you have problems with rich people, who broke the law and hurt people on the way to getting, or to get this money, go after them. But keep your damned hands off of the property of law abiding citizens, even if you think you can put it to a better use. I'd rather go after the source of the problem, the reason these people have been able to cheat their way to untold sums of money, as well.
If you have ideas and proposals, that don't run against the grain of the Constitution, by all means, carry on.
I'm sure other members have much better thoughts to add, so I'll defer to them and end this little rant.
edit on 1-11-2011 by GringoViejo because: (no reason given)
The free market isn't the problem, but by no means is it a perfect market. Why did they sit back though? Why wait to get involved? Why wait for government to act? Demand it! If they had been involved earlier they would realize that they are attacking a symptom of the problem, not the problem.
Originally posted by phishyblankwaters
reply to post by GringoViejo
That's exactly what they are trying to do. they sat back and let the "free market" work. It failed. They sat back and let the banks take control. It failed. They waiting eagerly for the government to take action. They didn't.
some people calling themselves part of the OWS movement are demanding the crazy things like what you mentioned. The American Nazi party is also involved, does that make OWS a nazi movement? Is OWS supporting the notion that jews are evil and Aryans are the master race? Of course not. The communist elements are just that elements, as are the socialists.
You can stick your fingers in your ears and ignore it for as long as you see fit, it doesn't change the fact that they are trying to fix the system.
There are always going to be fringe, vocal, elements trying to sway opinion this way or that way. Most of the world refuses to let the minority speak for the majority.
I'm about sick of this OWS crap. Every thread is the same.
They want to end capitalism, they want to steal from the rich.
It has never been, nor it will it be, about "stealing" from the rich, or a complete forgiveness of debt, or a "free ride". you can moan and complain saying that is what they want, but it isn't, and if you don't know at this point, you refuse of accept information that goes contrary to the belief system you currently hold. You are living in a filter bubble.
The solution is plain as day. End the corruption, punish the criminals, and stop allowing them to play the tax code like a harp while everyone else, that horrible 99%, has to pick up the slack. Really most of the problems wouldn't exist if that were the case.
The end game is ending the Federal Reserve. but that requires something to replace it, not just ideas. That will take time. But what can be fixed now, overnight, is the corporate fraud and tax evasion.
You're a CEO and you've defrauded your company out of millions of dollars, probably the retirement fund.
By some miracle, you get caught. At worst, a few months in jail, but most likely you'll pay a fine and be done with it.
you're a worker and a home owner. you decided to (or accidentally) cheat on your taxes. You get caught. Can you buy your way out? No, you are going to prison my friend.
That's the core issue, that's the problem at the core that is rotting the entire thing.
the free market does work, but not when run from the top as a ponzi scheme.
People on ATS are being advised to prepare for when TSHTF, but they can't see that they're the ones throwing it.
Originally posted by AmatuerSkyWatcher
But but but, OP , they are already taking my stuff, and I have no say. They are taking it and giving it to the already rich bankers because they made a mistake. The bankers aren't hurting, infact they have given themselves nice big bonuses. Yet here I am, indebted for the rest of my days for something I didn't take part in, or have a choice about.
Originally posted by GringoViejo
One example I've seen here on ATS is a proposed (global) cap on wealth. The proposal involves people being limited to earning a billion dollars, after that, they can't keep anymore. It gets put back into the system for "the good of the people."
Now, most of OWS would see this and go "Yeah! What's wrong with that? Nobody needs anymore than that anyways!"
Originally posted by doctornamtab
Constitutional Solutions
Lottocracy for Congress - This is direct democracy run much like jury duty, except for Congress. This is the only way to truly have a government of, by and for the people.
A right to free food and shelter - We got tons of food, millions of empty homes, apartments, hotels, hostels, dormitories, etc. We can provide these basic life necesities for everyone. It would make unemployment a non issue and create an entirely optional market economy. Then, IF YOU CHOOSE, you can work some job for more money. Food and shelter are our most primary human needs, it should be our primary human right.
Boom.