It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ArrowsNV
Originally posted by Q:1984A:1776
reply to post by MrXYZ
If those OWS people actually want to make a difference, they could take all of their money out of the banks they claim to despise. They could stop paying their taxes to a government that subsidizes the evil practices of said banks. They could stop buying #ing Guy Fawkes masks from God damned Time Warner!
That's exactly what they're doing, in case you haven't been paying attention. They've been advocating moving money out of banks and taking it to credit unions pretty much since OWS started. Last I heard a bunch of OWS protesters were actually arrested in a CitiBank for doing just that. And when I look at the pictures of the protests I see more people without Fawkes masks than with with them.
Maybe you should keep current with things happening around the planet.
This means that the investment bank’s European derivatives exposure is now backstopped by U.S. taxpayers. Bank of America didn’t get regulatory approval to do this, they just did it at the request of frightened counterparties. Now the Fed and the FDIC are fighting as to whether this was sound. The Fed wants to “give relief” to the bank holding company, which is under heavy pressure.
This is a direct transfer of risk to the taxpayer done by the bank without approval by regulators and without public input. You will also read below that JP Morgan is apparently doing the same thing wit
This changes the picture completely. This move reflects either criminal incompetence or abject corruption by the Fed. Even though I’ve expressed my doubts as to whether Dodd Frank resolutions will work, dumping derivatives into depositaries pretty much guarantees a Dodd Frank resolution will fail. Remember the effect of the 2005 bankruptcy law revisions: derivatives counterparties are first in line, they get to grab assets first and leave everyone else to scramble for crumbs. [color=;imegreen]So this move amounts to a direct transfer from derivatives counterparties of Merrill to the taxpayer, via the FDIC, which would have to make depositors whole after derivatives counterparties grabbed collateral. It’s well nigh impossible to have an orderly wind down in this scenario. You have a derivatives counterparty land grab and an abrupt insolvency. Lehman failed over a weekend after JP Morgan grabbed collateral.
But it’s even worse than that. During the savings & loan crisis, the FDIC did not have enough in deposit insurance receipts to pay for the Resolution Trust Corporation wind-down vehicle. It had to get more funding from Congress. This move paves the way for another TARP-style shakedown of taxpayers, this time to save depositors. No Congressman would dare vote against that. This move is Machiavellian, and just plain evil.
With the FDIC insurance fund running low, there’s a fair amount of confusion out there about whether the FDIC can run out of money. The answer is no, it can’t. The insurance fund might be down to its last $13 billion, but that number is really useful only for accounting purposes. There’s a government guarantee on bank deposits; the FDIC is merely the arm of the government which administers that guarantee and tries to make sure, by charging banks insurance premiums, that it doesn’t cost the taxpayer any money over the long term.
Joe Weisenthal, this morning, says that we needn’t worry about the FDIC’s money running out because “Congress will replenish the FDIC instantly” — implying that there’s at least the possibility that Congress wouldn’t replenish the FDIC. But that’s not the case. [color=;imegreen]In May, President Obama signed a bill providing the FDIC with as much as $500 billion in credit at the Treasury — more than enough to cover anybody’s bank-failure worst-case scenario. That bill is now a law, which means that Congress needs to do nothing in the event that the FDIC’s funds go to zero. Why the FDIC won’t run out of money
Originally posted by ArrowsNV
Haha I reposted that comic last night.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by ArrowsNV
It's very true.
"DURR I DONT KNOW WHAT OWS WANTS, THEYR DUMB"
Well why don't you simply do some research and find out instead of just listening to the bought media telling you what they want you to hear? Their demands are pretty clear; In a nutshell they are: End the Fed and end corporate lobbying of elected officials as a start to removing the greed and corruption from politics.
Originally posted by Battleline
reply to post by MrXYZ
All of what you said may be true or just your opinion.Unless someone has the ability to understand or research with some sort of comprehension then there is no way to know and a little late to obtain a degree in Economics.
That being said I belive you, I have read enough to know and researched enough to understand a little about derivatives,but my point is ,how many people in these parks do you think have a clue as to what you are talking about and understand anything about why they are there?
These demonstrations may have started out with good intent but have quickly become a joke.I watch the demonstrations in the middle east and then watch the people here in the U.S. crapping in the streets and camped out in the parks and all I see is a joke with no direction,and YA ,thats only my opinion.
Originally posted by Q:1984A:1776
reply to post by MrXYZ
If those OWS people actually want to make a difference, they could take all of their money out of the banks they claim to despise. They could stop paying their taxes to a government that subsidizes the evil practices of said banks. They could stop buying #ing Guy Fawkes masks from God damned Time Warner!
I don't use banks, I've found ways to avoid paying all Federal Income Tax (legally), and I don't buy products from corporations that I disagree with. THAT is the free market in action. They often talk smack about capitalism, but by exercising my abilities as a capitalist, I just accomplished more by my simple inaction, than they do by camping out in the cold and chanting 'til their voices crack.
The ability to enforce these clauses, especially with Mexico, and with much consideration and emotional discussion, the House of Representatives approved NAFTA on November 17, 1993, by a vote of 234 to 200. The agreement's supporters included 132 Republicans and 102 Democrats. NAFTA passed the Senate 61-38. Senate supporters were 34 Republicans and 27 Democrats. Clinton signed it into law on December 8, 1993; it went into effect on January 1, 1994
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by ArrowsNV
Originally posted by sonnny1
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by sonnny1
Originally posted by ArrowsNV
"DURR I DONT KNOW WHAT OWS WANTS, THEYR DUMB"
Well why don't you simply do some research and find out instead of just listening to the bought media telling you what they want you to hear? Their demands are pretty clear; In a nutshell they are: End the Fed and end corporate lobbying of elected officials as a start to removing the greed and corruption from politics.
Wrong...........
People are doing research into it. Thats why there isnt 20 freekin million people at these OWS rally's ! NO ONE is buying it. Tell me,why isnt there 20 million,50 million ANGRY people showing up to these?
I wait patently for a response.
There's not that many yet because there's an obvious lack of knowledge...your posts are a great example of that. You are essentially ignoring $75 trillion dollars
First of all, no one's against profits or companies. But those profits shouldn't be made at the expense of citizens, their tax payer money and SAVINGS (!!!!) shouldn't be gambled (Wall Street) with or wasted (wars).
You can't look at people with a straight face and tell them it's ok that a single Wall Street company alone uses citizens' savings as collaterale for gambling used to pay crazy boni. Are you seriously ok with losing your savings if those banks go bust? Really?
Really? Im not ignoring anything actually. I see a protest,that has 3000 squatters in NY. Counted. Thats not a movement..
Second,75 trillion? How much money,in the past 100 years,has Governments wasted? Can you look that up for me? Hell,Medicare fraud is at 50 million a day. Should I protest people on Medicare,that abuse it? People in America believe that for every dollar the Government has,50% goes to waste.I am sure its really close to that,if not more. See,its AMERICANS that are Angry. Just look at what Congress approval is at,Hell,the Presidents. 75 trillion.....Again,where are the 20 million OWS supporters? Where are they? Waiting for more info? No. They dont Buy this protest,And wont.
Originally posted by jacobe001
Then you would have no problem with shrinking all of the government to about 10% to what it is today then correct?
The problem is, the PARASITES and COCKROACHES at the top rely on a BIG GOVERNMENT to be able to dish out those crony contracts and subsidies to their Wall Street and Corporate Cronies.
I'm all for shrinking the government to 10% of what it is today so these cockroaches can FAIL and have to actually put on their BOOTSTRAPS and work in a real and free market.
Not one tailored to their benefit at everyone else's expense!
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by superluminal11
In other words: Don't be outraged and protest, remain obedient little workers....riiiiiiight
Originally posted by Q:1984A:1776
They could stop buying #ing Guy Fawkes masks from God damned Time Warner!
Originally posted by MrXYZ
I mean, in of the other threads, a guy seriously said "I don't know what they are so mad about!". To me, that just shows how indifferent many people are...and they need to stop being indifferent to issues like this, or else nothing will ever get better.