It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Again do you have a link from the police where they acknowledge they have question this woman once? That they limit this phone call to coming from one of the stolen cellphones? I've looked and can't find one. This could be an assumption on her part. That call could have come from the house phone.
As far as I can tell the police have not stated anything about Megan, it is all what Megan reports the police told her???
Originally posted by silo13
reply to post by wigit
reply to post by MissPoovey
Agreed. The mum's been mauled enough. Amazing how buying some wine and party plates can be turned into a black mark on someone's reputation.
That she knowingly withheld this information from the police is the problem - not - that she bought wine.
As for a 'boyfriend'? I know nothing about this. Let me go back and read through the thread and see where that cropped up.
peaceedit on 11-10-2011 by silo13 because: (no reason given)
Judge Jeanine: “But that night, who went to bed first, Debbie?” Debbi: “Um, Lisa. And then I put the boys to bed and I, I, I went to sleep.” Judge Jeanine: “The neighbor was gone when you went to sleep?” Debbi: “Yeah.” Judge Jeanine: “And you think that was about 10:30?” Debbi: “Yeah.”
Originally posted by silo13
reply to post by Dav1d
Again do you have a link from the police where they acknowledge they have question this woman once? That they limit this phone call to coming from one of the stolen cellphones? I've looked and can't find one. This could be an assumption on her part. That call could have come from the house phone.
As far as I can tell the police have not stated anything about Megan, it is all what Megan reports the police told her???
The original link to the information you request is a few pages back on this thread. I posted it as it came in and it will answer your questions above.
I'm sorry Dave but it's here somewhere - but you see I have the flu and I'm being poo-pee cause I just don't want to go hunt up what's already been posted here. I'll do it tomorrow if you don't find it. For now I have to go to bed - I'm beat.
Have a great evening! See you tomorrow!
hugs
Shortly after Lisa vanished, Bradley said that three of the family's cell phones that had been sitting on the kitchen counter were taken along with her daughter. Police have been mum about the phones, but a Kansas City woman told "Good Morning America" today that she received a phone call from one of those phones on the night Lisa disappeared. "I received a phone call, well my phone did, the night that baby Lisa went missing," Megan Wright said. "It was apparently a 50 second phone call. I don't know who answered it or what was said or who was on the other end of the phone." Wright said investigators tracked her down and have questioned her four times.
Originally posted by silo13
Missing Baby Lisa Irwin: Damaging Details Emerge Despite Damage Control
Here's more on the damaging details that are emerging in the Irwin case:
* Pirro did not know whether lead attorney Joe Tacopina fired Short or whether she left the case for other reasons. But ABC News reported that she was "forced off the case overnight," local Kansas City station KMBC said.
* The Irwin's New York counsel Joe Tacopina has told police he will reschedule the interview of the two boys for sometime next week. It's an extraordinarily late time to be finally allowing interviews of witnesses who were in the house the night the baby is said to have disappeared.
* There was a phone call made from one of the missing cellphones in the early morning hours of Oct. 4.
Judge Pirro said the police confirmed this to her.
David - take note:
The recipient of the call was the message box of someone named Megan Wright. Police have talked to Wright (4 times) but haven't released details of what, if anything, they learned.
This new revelation by Judge Pirro is consistent with Bradley's statements about early police interviews in which she said they had ping data from one of the phones.
Was Ashley Irwin misinformed, or attempting serious damage control when she claimed that the 2:30 a.m. phone call was a rumor and could not possibly have happened? The blog Shadowplay noted that Ashley Irwin posted on its Find Baby Lisa Facebook page Oct. 17, "Jeremy was at home with the children while Debbie & her brother went to the store. The 2:30 a.m. phone call is a false rumor. Their cellphones were shut off due to non-payment. No one could have made a call and that is also why police couldn't ping them."
* Bradley and Jeremy Irwin said they discovered that their cellphones were missing when they tried to call 911 after discovering their daughter missing and not finding her in a house search. "Jeremy had his work cellphone on his body when he got home at 4 a.m. That's how they called 911." Ashley Irwin posted Oct. 17 on Find Baby Lisa. So why was there any effort to find missing home cellphones or delay in calling 911?
Originally posted by Michelle129th
Originally posted by silo13
reply to post by Dav1d
Again do you have a link from the police where they acknowledge they have question this woman once? That they limit this phone call to coming from one of the stolen cellphones? I've looked and can't find one. This could be an assumption on her part. That call could have come from the house phone.
As far as I can tell the police have not stated anything about Megan, it is all what Megan reports the police told her???
The original link to the information you request is a few pages back on this thread. I posted it as it came in and it will answer your questions above.
I'm sorry Dave but it's here somewhere - but you see I have the flu and I'm being poo-pee cause I just don't want to go hunt up what's already been posted here. I'll do it tomorrow if you don't find it. For now I have to go to bed - I'm beat.
Have a great evening! See you tomorrow!
hugs
In the first cell phone post on this thread (page 57) there is absolutely no police confirmation of the phone call or megan wright that I can see in either text or video. From some searching there is also no actual police confirmation. Even the media is not stating "police have confirmed", so it's all this woman's word and nothing else
All just "she said"
Michelle
Originally posted by schmae
Megan Wright is the woman who got the phone call from one of the newly URESTRICTED phones missing from the Irwin house . Police have questioned her 4 times after tracking her down from ( im guessing here) looking at the phone records from the phone. co.
LINK
www.youtube.com...
At 1:24 markedit on 29-10-2011 by schmae because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by schmae
reply to post by Dav1d
I agree, very few of these 'reporters' are REPORTING the news. They are making up and or distorting the news to sensationalize 100% . It's a shame they won't speak with local media because they are the one who would likely REPORT, not so much the big wig with their own nightly show who lives half a country away....like Nancy ! I was watching Nancy during the Trenton Duckett story and I that thing was a HUGE fiasco. If any of you don't know of it, go google it and you'll see what Nancy's priority its..........ratings ....and darn the consequences of her actions.
Another thing David about the police not confirming . Megan's account of things. I don't find thatall that odd, because truly the police have neither confirmed or denied almost anything. Most of the info is coming from the family or other sources. That's why I think the police already have a case built pretty strongly or KNOW pretty well what happened. They don't give press confrerences or updates at all, do they?
The reality is....mom didn't report the drinking information to the MEDIA until a week later....that does not mean she didn't report it to the police from day one.
Again, I don't hear/see Deborah saying she put baby to bed at 10:30, but rather that she herself went to bed at that time
In the first cell phone post on this thread (page 57) there is absolutely no police confirmation of the phone call or megan wright that I can see in either text or video. From some searching there is also no actual police confirmation. Even the media is not stating "police have confirmed", so it's all this woman's word and nothing else
As far as I've been able to tell there is one clip of Megan Wright, and that is it. Based on the one clip, we alledgedly have Jeremy non-working cell phone calling at 2:28 am in the morning and him leaving a message for someone?
The young woman, Megan Wright, said police tracked her down four times to question her about the call.
he public is perplexed and asked, among other things Friday, why missing Missouri baby Lisa Irwin’s parents are refusing to meet with detectives to answer questions that police say only they can answer.
If the baby was abducted in the middle of the night as the parents allege, it doesn't make sense to the public why they are holding back on talking with police, and why they won’t allow their sons to be re-interviewed.
So what if police said Deborah failed a lie detector test, they say. Go back and offer to take another one. Saying you failed might have been a police tactic. So what if you’re exhausted, your baby is missing and you may hold the key to finding her.
Ed Smart was so exhausted when his daughter went missing that following police interrogation he collapsed and landed in the hospital. He was out the next day and it didn't stop him - he was back at it, and stayed at it until he was cleared of all suspicion. And he was highly suspected of having something to do with Elizabeth's disappearance. Elizabeth Smart was kidnapped from her bedroom in the middle of the night while she slept with her younger sister who witnessed the kidnapping, and who was questioned about what she saw. That family did not hold back, they pressed forward and did whatever they could to find Elizabeth. Fortunately, her story had a happy ending when she was found 9 months later. Elizabeth is now working to help families whose loved ones go missing.
A call was received Friday by a woman who wishes to remain anonymous. She asked that these questions be posed:
“Did the interviews for the boys, that police say could lead to answers in their missing sister’s case, get canceled Friday because their attorney, Joe Tacopina, is still in Rome negotiating his soccer deal with As Roma?” The caller then said, “I want to ask, is Tacopina’s involvement in this case more about Tacopina than Baby Lisa? Is he exploiting these parents? Is he taking away from finding the baby for his own egotistical reasons? Is he a media hound?
Police continue to say that Deborah and Jeremy are hindering their ability to move the investigation forward because they are refusing to come back in and answer questions detectives want to ask them independently. Questions, police say, only they can answer.
It is incumbent upon police to interview and re-interview parents when there are inconsistencies in their stories, as is the case here. These parents will remain a main focus of the investigation until they are cleared of any suspicion in their daughter’s disappearance.
Non-cooperation from parents is a major hindrance in a missing child case, and is often seen when parents are later determined to have had involvement. The public knows this, and when parents refuse to cooperate, a shadow of doubt is cast upon them and they begin to appear as though they have something to hide.
Originally posted by silo13
reply to post by Michelle129th
So what's your point? There's no link or no confirmation?
You REALLY THINK this woman is going to step out and tell national media thus and so if it's a total fabrication?
Fine, that's your opinion.
peace