It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by xXxinfidelxXx
reply to post by itsthetooth
Meh believe me you don't want to be like me. I am only like this because it's the only way I know how to be. The road that I travel is not one that I would wish on my worst enemy, as it is just plain lonely, but I am what I am. That's what these clowns don't seem to realize. I am not just being an asshole, this is who I am, for better or for worse, with emphasis on the latter. Don't worry about XYZ though as they are the 3 letters before ZERO lol kinda speaks volumes about the person behind the posts doesn't it. Also, Colin looks suspiciously like Colon, which also speaks volumes about the content of said posts. Meh, anyways.....sometimes it's better to tuck your tail than to have to be the alpha male all the time, when all those who consider themselves alphas are just sheep in wolves' clothing. I think you know who I'm referring to so I don't think I need to elaborate on that point. Meh. I guess it's too much to ask for people to actually discuss things instead of just standing on a soap box and telling everybody else with a voice of their own to shut up. Reminds me of a movie I saw from the '30s, which was a little hard to understand, as it was in GERMAN. Meh I think I'm done ranting for now. Have a good one.edit on 29/3/2012 by xXxinfidelxXx because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by xXxinfidelxXx
reply to post by MrXYZ
Seriously.....just give up. You are not helping your situation. Just because I know the truth, doesn't mean I can't play the game just as well as you. It's just too much fun making you look foolish. Also, that post was directed at someone other than you,so your response is only making it more obvious that I have struck a nerve. I would love to play poker with you one day, as your emotions are out of control man. Oh, yes, but I forgot, you just want to have the last word, now doncha. Way to act like the stereotypical American. If you are in fact from a different country, that just makes it even more sad, now doesn't it.edit on 29/3/2012 by xXxinfidelxXx because: (no reason given)
Ya MR xyz, when you have to profile people to try to win a debate, it really shows your true intelligence, or lack of. Your not the only one guilty of doing it on here too. There are a few others, its just lame. You may as well say, well your right and I'm wrong but maybe I can win it over by mudslinging.
I really didn't want to fall victim to the little game you've got going on here, but I had to respond to that little gem. You do realize that every time you respond to me, you attempt to divert attention from every good point that I have made and towards the one mistake that I made. Honestly, you just make yourself look more like a troll every time you respond. If you actually think that the whole 15m thing was the only point that I made than you need to go back to english class and learn to read, as that was but a fraction of my argument. Of course, it is the MO of every Troll worth his salt to point out only the mistakes of their adversary while not acknowledging anything else. Also, you seem to like the phrase "ad hominem, " but repeating it over and over again does not make me wrong. As a matter of fact, it just shows that I struck a nerve. See, I'm smarter than you think. I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but I can read you like a book. You reek of insecurity. How's that for an ad hominem schpiel. Seriously. The holier-than-thou schtick only works on idiots. Just because I am an angry person, does not make my points any less valid, it just means that the weak minded who only see things in shades of emotion cannot see the facts through my method of delivery. It's a great way to weed out the sheep. And yet again, it has served it's purpose quite well. You seem to like conformity for conformity's sake, but needless to say, that is not the way to be.
Yes, a baby gazelle would easily survive alone for 2 days in the Serengeti
Good thing thats not the only place you would find them. And if they are so intolerent of the wild why is there species not extinct?
[
Surveys have reported steep declines (60-70%) over periods of c. 20 years dating from the late 1970s in several places, including the main strongholds for the species: Serengeti, Masai Mara and Ngorongoro. Though overall numbers still seem to be falling, no declines on this scale have been reported recently. However, it is estimated that the decline over the last 3 generations (18 years) has reached 25%, and is very possibly higher, bringing the species very close to qualifying for Vulnerable under criterion A. Careful monitoring of population trends is needed and it is entirely feasible that new survey information could merit transfer of this species to a higher category of threat. This assessment considers E. thomsonii and E. mongalla as separate species when formerly they were assessed together. Under this arrangement, Thomson's Gazelle now has a relatively restricted distribution within East Africa, which should also be taken into consideration.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by MrXYZ
Your obviously wrong. Gazells are born in the wild and the live in the wild, they are also equiped to live in the wild which is why its assumed this boy in the wild would be dead after 2 days. Can you assume a baby gazell is dead after two days, no you cant. Your wrong again.
Yes, and infants generally don't survive well on their own even within their habitat. Take an infant gazelle and place it alone somewhere in the Serengeti...or somewhere where polar bears hunt (to use your "out of natural habitat analogy)...and then count the minutes until that gazelle is dead
LOGIC for crying out loud!
I read the information you gave in your profile and from that and your attitude on this thread you show yorself to be a very damaged and troubled person
Originally posted by xXxinfidelxXx
reply to post by arbiture
You brought a well formulated argument to the wrong place man. Most minds are closed in this thread, quite obviously. Any attempt at a decent debate is quickly muddled by insults here. If you really wanna discuss this topic, I would suggest starting a new thread, as I am too lazy to lol. Kudos for trying though.
Sorry about clipping your post like this but you refuse to use pargaphs. The above is a cop out. If you dont want to be like this then you have the choice to do something about it.
Meh believe me you don't want to be like me. I am only like this because it's the only way I know how to be.
And this whole argument stems from the difference with humans being in the wild, particularly babies. Are you trying to persuade me into believing that a human baby has a better chance of surviving in the wild over a baby gazelle? You really should think before you reply with such non sense.
You know when you make a statement like the above, do a quick google before pressing "reply"
Thompsons gazelle - habitats
That whole article is quite interesting, it states that the thompsons gazelles are classified as "near threatened" as a species.
I have to explained this about 8 times now. I'm saying that it could have just as easily have been a creator that created all the diversity.
Tooth has never tried to discuss this or anything else which is why he garners no respect. The title is misleading but that change was not in my control.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by colin42
I have to explained this about 8 times now. I'm saying that it could have just as easily have been a creator that created all the diversity.
Tooth has never tried to discuss this or anything else which is why he garners no respect. The title is misleading but that change was not in my control.
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by MrXYZ
Well tit for tat, I don't see anyone on here proving evolution.
And I doubt very seriously if Persinger published this article all on a pretend basis. There might be some bugs to work out, but something is going on. Just face it, you can't admit that your wrong. You try to stretch things that are truth into a lie, and lies into the truth. I also forgot to mention his article was titled Telepathy is a fact, so I guess you must be calling that a typo. You seriously need to grow up.
"Even the bible" isn't exactly a good argument
As for hidden powers, nothing has been proven. Persinger's "god helmet" (that's how he calls his device) hasn't been peer reviewed, and his results haven't been analyzed yet...which he admits. It is possible that the results are skewed because of the participants suggestibility...which he also admits. More research is required.
So pretending telepathy is real and proven is dishonest.
Like I said a million times there haven't been any links or information that was factual. I'm reading it, but questioning if you actually are. If you read them correctly you would find they are fake, and made up hypothesis.
People have posted dozens of links with scientific evidence...you simply ignore it all. You're not even refuting the posted evidence, you're merely ignoring it
Really, you honestly believe that, just like how no one can produce a single example of target food for humans, but I'm debunked right, or how Persinger your saying has made up his findings. Sure, where is your proof its honestly looking more like your debunked. You can lie to your self all you want but I'm a tad smarter.
The sad part is, at the same time we have completely debunked every single point you made...and we did it by posting objective evidence.
The problem that your faced with here is two fold. You see Pye doesn't mention the bible, but he may not know it, his findings match the bible. So your trying to tell me its just one great big coincidence. Sorry I don't buy it. The bible was accurate, as Pye's findings reflects. I'm also seeing a new trend here, as my sources grow in numbers, you are just quick to state that they are either false or can't be considered factual. In other words everyone else is wrong and your right. Sorry man, your looking more like a fool, and its just getting worse.
You're here to preach, and I'm not sure you realize this, but given that you never back up your claims with objective evidence, your credibility isn't high when it comes to science
Originally posted by itsthetooth
reply to post by MrXYZ
And I doubt very seriously if Persinger published this article all on a pretend basis. There might be some bugs to work out, but something is going on. Just face it, you can't admit that your wrong. You try to stretch things that are truth into a lie, and lies into the truth. I also forgot to mention his article was titled Telepathy is a fact, so I guess you must be calling that a typo. You seriously need to grow up.
"Even the bible" isn't exactly a good argument
As for hidden powers, nothing has been proven. Persinger's "god helmet" (that's how he calls his device) hasn't been peer reviewed, and his results haven't been analyzed yet...which he admits. It is possible that the results are skewed because of the participants suggestibility...which he also admits. More research is required.
So pretending telepathy is real and proven is dishonest.
edit on 30-3-2012 by itsthetooth because: (no reason given)