It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Shamatt
reply to post by Haxsaw
To call gay people perverts is a disgusting homophobic slur. There is no connection between homosexuality and pedophilia - statements like yours are ignorant and there is no place for them on a forum such as this one.
Considering that there's a lot of sexual violence (including pedophilia) in war, you may have a point.
Originally posted by blocula
just replying to the mental illness issue that was raised above and how the only thing we ever really "react" to is sex...not war < the real evil in our society.
Originally posted by hypervalentiodine
Originally posted by blocula
[ and what have they ^^^ accomplished? except funneling $$$ into the wrong "unseen" hands and to react after the fact by picking up the torn remains of their little clothes and retreive the broken pieces of their shattered little bodies and minds and what have they prevented? nothing! kids are massacred on a daily basis and hardly ever is a word even spoken in their defense...its always sex,sex,sex,...sex is the "only reason" we are here and does anyone recall the janet jackson breast incident?!...what a joke!...who cares,yet the earth shook back and forth from all the puritan gut reactions...wow!
Still failing to see the point pertaining to the OP here.
Key highlights from the conference include these disturbing assertions (more disturbing excerpts available at the end of this article):
•Pedophiles are "unfairly stigmatized and demonized" by society.
•"The majority of pedophiles are gentle and rational."
•There was concern about "vice-laden diagnostic criteria" and "cultural baggage of wrongfulness."
•"We are not required to interfere with or inhibit our child's sexuality."
•"Children are not inherently unable to consent" to sex with an adult.
•An adult's desire to have sex with children is "normative."
•Our society should "maximize individual liberty. ... We have a highly moralistic society that is not consistent with liberty."
•"In Western culture sex is taken too seriously."
•"Anglo-American standard on age of consent is new [and 'Puritanical']. In Europe it was always set at 10 or 12. Ages of consent beyond that are relatively new and very strange, especially for boys. They've always been able to have sex at any age."
• "Assuming children are unable to consent lends itself to criminalization and stigmatization."
•A consensus belief by both speakers and pedophiles in attendance was that, because it vilifies MAPs, pedophilia should be removed as a mental disorder from the American Psychiatric Association's (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), in the same manner homosexuality was removed in 1973.
this is just disgusting.
Homosexuality can be moral because of the two ADULTS with ADULT minds with consent.
children have no desire for sex.
this is just wrong.
Edit: i'm playing on the fact that heterosexuality and homosexuality are a way of life. these pedos believe that their fetish is the same.
Originally posted by hypervalentiodine
The entire profession of psychology would beg to differ. Not factually based? How about doing some research
Originally posted by Maslo
I believe mental illness is defined as (potentialy or actually) causing some harm to the sufferer or others. Thus things like pedophilia but also for example, psychopathy are mental illnesses under this definition.
Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes
What ?
Of course the entire concept of mental health is not factually based.
Psychology barely even qualifies as science, unless it has some objective neuroscientific backing, and even then, the subjective definitions of what mental processes are ''healthy'' or ''unhealthy'' are completely unscientific, and fly in the face of the principles of apparent random, directionless evolution.
As I say, the only realistic way to analyse and assign properties of mental ''normality'' and ''abnormality'' is on a statistical basis. But then any belief or preference which was a statistical minority in humans could be accurately classified as a mental illness; eg. homosexuality, atheism, vegetarianism, etc.
Sexuality is a perfect example. Some men are attracted to women; some men are attracted to men; some men are attracted to boys; some men are attracted to girls; some men are attracted to two or more of the above groups of people. How, exactly, can one form of sexual attraction be a ''mental illness'' while other forms of attraction are considered ''normal'' or ''healthy''. It just doesn't make any sense whatsoever from a logical perspective.
Also, I don't need to do any research, as all I need to do is to don my thinking cap. My argument is irrefutable, and perhaps it's you who needs to give this issue an extra thought or two.
Originally posted by CynicalDrivel
This was asserted as being statements directly from this conference:
Key highlights from the conference include these disturbing assertions (more disturbing excerpts available at the end of this article):
•Pedophiles are "unfairly stigmatized and demonized" by society.
•"The majority of pedophiles are gentle and rational."
•There was concern about "vice-laden diagnostic criteria" and "cultural baggage of wrongfulness."
•"We are not required to interfere with or inhibit our child's sexuality."
•"Children are not inherently unable to consent" to sex with an adult.
•An adult's desire to have sex with children is "normative."
•Our society should "maximize individual liberty. ... We have a highly moralistic society that is not consistent with liberty."
•"In Western culture sex is taken too seriously."
•"Anglo-American standard on age of consent is new [and 'Puritanical']. In Europe it was always set at 10 or 12. Ages of consent beyond that are relatively new and very strange, especially for boys. They've always been able to have sex at any age."
• "Assuming children are unable to consent lends itself to criminalization and stigmatization."
•A consensus belief by both speakers and pedophiles in attendance was that, because it vilifies MAPs, pedophilia should be removed as a mental disorder from the American Psychiatric Association's (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), in the same manner homosexuality was removed in 1973.
Originally posted by hypervalentiodine
Psychology and its ideas are on the most part based upon statistics, which is indeed scientific.
Originally posted by hypervalentiodine
Additionally, it's hard to argue that neuropsychology isn't a science - unless you argue that neuroscience as a whole is unfounded and unscientific. Going by the purist definition of what science should include and what it should not does not make psychology any less a science, it just makes you an arrogant purist.
Originally posted by hypervalentiodine
The definition of what fits in to the healthy or not-so-healthy basket I will agree is subjective and based entirely on cultural norms; for example, in medieval times (and earlier) it was common place to marry girls as young as 13 whereas these days that would be considered morally reprehensible.
Originally posted by hypervalentiodine
That being said, I think that there are still certain deviations in the psyche of a person that would ubiquitously be considered as 'wrong' - the desire to have sexual relations with pre-pubescent children, for example.
Originally posted by hypervalentiodine
Agreed. As I say, psychology is heavily founded on statistical methods. However, just being a minority does not necessarily mean that what ever that minority is will be classified as a mental illness; and why should it? It's analogous to saying that all immigrants have a mental disorder because they are a minority. Last I checked, 'being Mexican' wasn't a disease.
Originally posted by hypervalentiodine
It does make sense, though. The attraction to one or another gender (or both) is inherent within your psyche. The term, 'illness' comes about when it is deemed that your attraction is in some way morally wrong. For a long time (and still to some degree today) homosexuality was deemed a mental illness in need of fixing, for example. The sexual attraction to minors is another example.
Originally posted by hypervalentiodine
You're wrong. Everybody needs to do a little more research.
Originally posted by hypervalentiodine
Your argument is flawed
Originally posted by hypervalentiodine
and you have no concept of what psychology actually is.
Originally posted by hypervalentiodine
Maybe take a course or two and come back to me with an informed opinion.
Originally posted by CynicalDrivel
Originally posted by Shamatt
reply to post by Haxsaw
To call gay people perverts is a disgusting homophobic slur. There is no connection between homosexuality and pedophilia - statements like yours are ignorant and there is no place for them on a forum such as this one.
Well, sometimes there is a direct connection between pedophilia and homosexuality. When a pedophile only likes little boys, is he a heterosexual pervert or a homosexual one?
Children do not consent.
I remember trying to scratch a person's eyes out and screaming.
This is just more psychological babble giving the criminal more rights than the victims.
Burglars would be classed as mentally ill, both because they ''suffer'' from greed, envy and/or desperation, and because they harm the householder through their actions.
Homosexuality would be a ''mental illness'' in societies which do not fully tolerate intimate same-sex relationships, because of the suffering that the stifling of a gay person's desires may cause him or her.
Cigarette smoking is a mental illness, by that definition; eating meat is also a mental illness; unrequited love, as well.
No, sorry, that definition of mental illness is as ridiculous, unscientific and socially expedient as the actual concept of ''mental illness'' itself.