UK - Protestors 'arrest' county court Judge - Police blockaded by protesters (One man hospitalised

www.wirralglobe.co.uk...

Protetsors have "civilly arrested" a judge at Birkenhead county court.

A crowd of several hundred people has massed around the court in Birkenhead.

Police have begun forcibly ejecting protestors from the court in chaotic scenes.

Made up of people from across the UK, the marchers say they are excerting their "ancient right to lawful Rebellion under Article 16 of Magna Carta."

Also LIVE radio of the event here:

www.blogtalkradio.com... lion-event-130-to-330-gmt

By the looks of things, people are getting sick of the corruption and have tried to arrest a judge, in what eye witnesses are describing as a chaotic court scene.

Police have been called, some have been arrested, and the fate of the Judge is unknown at the moment.

People are lying in front of the vans and not letting the police vans move until the people have been released.

Sounds like the police are arresting the protesters and are siding with the Judge.

Seems like the radio is now down.
But i'll try and find more links for you all.

Good for them, It's nice too see a bit of lawful rebellion going on.
People are starting to get peed off with being punished for something they had no part off. (Greedy banker's putting us in the s**t)

I will have keep a look out for this story on Granada reports tonight.

S&F for you
Good find.

reply to post by mr-lizard


They're handing these out to people:




And here's a picture from the scene (not very good)

Anyone know what the ''ancient right to lawful rebellion'' is ??

I would be interested to understand this more....... it is a very British thing to do, if you can protest Lawfully..........and still cause a scene without the need for violence elsewhere....

Maybe the first steps towards the general public ''Rebelling' against TPTB and those greedy Fecking Bankers !!! et al

Regards

PDUK

tnsradio.com...

I think the above radiolink might be covering it too.

Sounds like 300 + people arrived to try and arrest the judge. The police turned on the protesters, but the protesters told the police it was common law, lawful rebellion and that the police should arrest the judge.

It's still going on at the moment.

Apparently the Judge or the magistrate is corrupt, and the protesters are still asking the police to arrest the judge

Full image of the leaflet the protestors are handing out:




The British Constitution Group it would seem.

Just found this youtube vid it look's it is by the people that organised it.
This is written underneath the vid

www.youtube.com...

The UK start there lawfull rebellion monday 7th March will be reported by RT,PressTV, Aljazeera and many liar channels like BBC and ITV, but there is to be huge coverage please come and join in and have your voice heard Please move this on (even if you are not in the UK).. to EVERYONE ......THIS IS A CLARION CALL TO THE PEOPLE UK and please make every EFFORT attend the event detailed below...other wise DOT NOT complain about your loss of freedom, rising costs and corruption in our judicial,political and financial system they are fleecing the people to line their own pockets at our expense and that has to stop now ...... we all now need to ask ourselves; Where is our line in the sand when do we say NO that has gone too far?
Are you prepared to support those who are putting there necks on the line for YOU and YOUR FAMILY and future generations - THIS ONCE GREAT COUNTRY? Or are you going to sit back and do NOTHING??
It's time to wake up....enough is enough!!

(UK) LAWFUL REBELLION - URGENT

Seismic event -- Monday 7th March -- 1pm - Hamilton Square. Birkenhead. Wirral.

[Mod edit - reduced external quote, external tags added]
[Mod Note see : 15e.) Recruitment/Solicitation: of the T&C]
Please Review: Site Tags For Quoting External Sources
Mod Note: Big Quote – Please Review This Link.

Apparently up to a thousand people have stormed the court. Dozens of police cars, dogs, riot vans, no violence though - Although one guy who was lying in front of the vehicles has been run over by the police - suspected spinal injuries.

Wowza.

Im glad to see this, i'd be there if there was one local to me. If everyone did this then it would be impossible for the media to get away with siding with the government with their consumers being the ones protesting

Well done them!!

Fighting for ones rights is becoming a dangerous thing to do nowadays.

For all interested in standing up for your rights , please look (in depth) into Legal Fiction, Common Law & Statutory Laws.

You will be astounded, then angry that you've been dupen into freely and willingly accepting your own enslavement by nothing more than agreeing to be seen (legally) as not a Human Being, accountable ONLY under Common Law, but a corporation(accountable to Statutory Law) by nothing more than agreeing to the term 'MR, MRS or MS' - terms which define your corporate status in a legal sense.

Refuse to be addressed by a title and you are then ONLY accountable under Common Law.

The Cat is out of the Bag!

Edit to add:

Oddly enough, the site 'www.ukcolumn.org' that hosted MANY excellent examples of what I mean, including a recent transcript of a court case which provided proof of the reality of this LEGAL FICTION sham, has gone down...

People arriving from everywhere - Dorset, Kent, wales, and elsewhere.

This is amazing

With a thousand (and more) on the street, this might make the national media?

This is great.
It's about time.
This is coming to America folks.
I just hope we are able to pull it off with the grace that some of the other countries are.

Seems humanity is ready to throw off the chains of oppression
and graduate to first grade.
We don't need other people to RULE over us.
We have literally been slaves for thousands of years now.
People are TAKING their freedoms back.

If I were a cop or a judge in this Country (America) I would change sides quick.
This throwing off the chains of oppression thing is catching on pretty fast and spreading like a virus.

If you listen to fools ......... the mob rules

I say read the unclean rabble the Riot Act then send in the cavalry, bayonets drawn!

reply to post by PurpleDog UK


I had a look at the english translation of the Magna Carta and article 16 has nothing to do with lawfull rebellion, it says-No man shall be compelled to do more service for a knight’s fee, or for any other land free-holding, than is due from it.
Here is the link to page I retrieved it from-Magna Carta

I think they may have got the article wrong and are possibly refering to article 61 which is thus-

Since for God, for the improvement of our kingdom, and to better allay the discord arisen between us and our barons, we have granted all these concessions, and wishing that the concessions be enjoyed in their entirety with firm endurance (for ever [5]), we give and grant to the barons the following security: Namely, that the barons choose any twenty-five barons of the kingdom they wish, who must with all their might observe and hold, and cause to be observed, the peace and liberties we have granted and confirmed to them by this our present Charter. Then, if we, our chief justiciar, our bailiffs or any of our officials, offend in any respect against any man, or break any of the articles of the peace or of this security, and the offence is notified to four of the said twenty-five barons, the four shall come to us—or to our chief justicicar if we are absent from the kingdom—to declare the transgression and petition that we make amends without delay. And if we, or in our absence abroad the chief justice, have not corrected the transgression within forty days, reckoned from the day on which the offence was declared to us (or to the chief justice if we are out of the realm), the four barons mentioned before shall refer the matter to the rest of the twenty-five barons. Together with the community of the whole land, they shall then distrain and distress us in every way possible, namely by seizing castles, lands, possessions and in any other they can (saving only our own person and those of the queen and our children), until redress has been obtain in their opinion. And when amends have been made, they shall obey us as before. Whoever in the country wants to, may take an oath to obey the orders of the twenty-five barons for the execution of all the previously mentioned matters and, with the barons, to distress us to the utmost of his power. We publicly and freely give permission to every one who wishes to take this oath, and we shall never forbid any one from taking it. Indeed, all those in the land who are unwilling to this oath, we shall by our command compel them to swear to it. If any one of the twenty-five barons dies or leaves the country, or is in any other manner incapacitated so the previously mentioned provisions cannot be undertaken, the remaining barons of the twenty-five shall choose another in his place as they think fit, who shall be duly sworn in like the rest. If there is any disagreement amongst the twenty-five barons on any matter presented to them, or if some of them are unwilling or unable to be present, what the majority of those present ordain or command shall be held as fixed and established, exactly as if all twenty-five had consented in this. The said twenty-five barons shall swear to faithfully observe all the aforesaid articles and will do all they can to ensure that the articles are observed by others. And we shall procure nothing from any one, either personally or indirectly, whereby any part of these concessions and liberties might be revoked or diminished; and if any such thing has been procured, let it be void and null, and we shall never make use of it ourselves or through someone else.

Here is a link to another statement that asks you to print it out and send to your local MP-Lawfull rebellion

Originally posted by Swanseadog
I think they may have got the article wrong and are possibly refering to article 61 which is thus-

Since for God, for the improvement of our kingdom, and to better allay the discord arisen between us and our barons, we have granted all these concessions, and wishing that the concessions be enjoyed in their entirety with firm endurance (for ever [5]), we give and grant to the barons the following security: Namely, that the barons choose any twenty-five barons of the kingdom they wish, who must with all their might observe and hold, and cause to be observed, the peace and liberties we have granted and confirmed to them by this our present Charter. Then, if we, our chief justiciar, our bailiffs or any of our officials, offend in any respect against any man, or break any of the articles of the peace or of this security, and the offence is notified to four of the said twenty-five barons, the four shall come to us—or to our chief justicicar if we are absent from the kingdom—to declare the transgression and petition that we make amends without delay. And if we, or in our absence abroad the chief justice, have not corrected the transgression within forty days, reckoned from the day on which the offence was declared to us (or to the chief justice if we are out of the realm), the four barons mentioned before shall refer the matter to the rest of the twenty-five barons. Together with the community of the whole land, they shall then distrain and distress us in every way possible, namely by seizing castles, lands, possessions and in any other they can (saving only our own person and those of the queen and our children), until redress has been obtain in their opinion. And when amends have been made, they shall obey us as before. Whoever in the country wants to, may take an oath to obey the orders of the twenty-five barons for the execution of all the previously mentioned matters and, with the barons, to distress us to the utmost of his power. We publicly and freely give permission to every one who wishes to take this oath, and we shall never forbid any one from taking it. Indeed, all those in the land who are unwilling to this oath, we shall by our command compel them to swear to it. If any one of the twenty-five barons dies or leaves the country, or is in any other manner incapacitated so the previously mentioned provisions cannot be undertaken, the remaining barons of the twenty-five shall choose another in his place as they think fit, who shall be duly sworn in like the rest. If there is any disagreement amongst the twenty-five barons on any matter presented to them, or if some of them are unwilling or unable to be present, what the majority of those present ordain or command shall be held as fixed and established, exactly as if all twenty-five had consented in this. The said twenty-five barons shall swear to faithfully observe all the aforesaid articles and will do all they can to ensure that the articles are observed by others. And we shall procure nothing from any one, either personally or indirectly, whereby any part of these concessions and liberties might be revoked or diminished; and if any such thing has been procured, let it be void and null, and we shall never make use of it ourselves or through someone else.

The letters they are handing out do clearly state section 61. They do not have it wrong at all.

Its just the website thats written about it wrongly.

reply to post by Swanseadog


a.yfrog.com...

No this actually say 61.



But good to check!