It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jatsc
I wonder if the people following the Celtic and Norse religions felt the same way when Christians came.
Have any of you read about what happen when Christians came to the America's, West Africa or Northern Europe the same exact stuff you are talking about happened then; why is no one mentioning that.
Christanity is not the native religion of Europe so what difference does another non native religion make ?
People complaining about Sharia Law, Christians have done the same stuff as Muslims have the only difference is that most of it stopped in the past 100 years except for some parts of the world.
Originally posted by Maslo
reply to post by SPACEYstranger
Obviously there is going to be unrest when 2 social/racial/religious groups occupy the same territory. But the wonderful thing is that time will eventually have them work out their differences (in one way or another)
One way or another? So you dont even care which way? It doesnt matter to you that there is a possibility of the etremist way winning - that means theocracy, stoning people for adultery etc.. in the western world? OMG..
To keep people stuffed in their corner would slow the social progress of our species.
What if mixing uncompatible cultures prematurely slows and threatens progress?
But obviously you have no proper grounds to assume that, and even then it would be fundamentally counter-productive to keep 2 racial groups apart for your own petty reasons.
Regardless, your arguing moot points once again, without any sort of supporting logic.
Theres no justification for this "societal engineering" idea.
Originally posted by TheGhostViking
still here are we ?
It is extremely sad that you dont see the point , immigration happens YOU will never stop it .
GROW UP
Ive had enough , its a joke it really is .
Immigration has disadavantages and in my opinion which freedom of speech protects the advantages outweight the disadavantages .
Originally posted by jameshawkings
reply to post by TruthxIsxInxThexMist
This Daily Mail article would only make sense if the muslim population in the UK hadn't already been targeted for sterilization. The plan is to damage the developing ovaries of their young females by using Polysorbate 80 i.e. Swine Flu Vaccine. This won't show until the next generation
Polysorbate 80 in Swine Flu Vaccine
UK Sterilization Program Now Focusing on the Pakistani and Bangladeshi Communitiesedit on 30-1-2011 by jameshawkings because: (no reason given)edit on 30-1-2011 by jameshawkings because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TheGhostViking
WHO does the earth belong too ?
YOU are free to travel as you please .
Is it ok in your eyes for expats to all go and live in marbella and turn it from a SPANISH CITY into a uk one with pubs and fish and chip bars ?
if it wasn't for muslims where would english guys go to soak up their 8 pints and stuff themselves like fat pigs ?
HAS spain "let too many " english people in ?
Why is england a joke around europe ? because of english white people being drunken animals when abroad .
Grow up and realise your nothing more than a pawn that has been brainwashed into attacking other pawns .
YOU WILL GET NOWHERE THINKING THIS WAY _
PS IM NOT ASIAN im a white british guy but i dont give a f about peoples colour ONLY THEIR ACTIONS !
JAMES i reposted this because our brothers and sisters have just ignored it cant think why . hmmmmm
In Europe and America people eat about 0.1 g of polysorbate 80 in foods per day.[7] Influenza vaccines contain 0.000025 g of polysorbate 80 per dose.[6]
In general, polysorbate 80 is safe and well-tolerated, although a small number of people are allergic to this substance,[8] and it may be harmful to people with Crohn's disease.[9]
Rats fed with diets containing up to 5% polysorbate 80 by volume showed no toxic effects (duration of study?).[10] Polysorbate 80 is not carcinogenic.[11] A 1956 study saw no effect on reproduction in rats at up to 5% of their diet being polysorbate 80, although reproduction decreased at 20% of the diet (duration of study?).[12] A 1993 study raised concerns that polysorbate 80 might decrease fertility in rats.[13] A 1997 study looked at the effect of consuming three doses by body weight of 0.5%/day on the sex organs of female rats and saw no abnormal changes (duration of study?); this is equivalent to a 70 kg person consuming about 350 g per day for three days.[14] A 2008 study concluded that there was no observable adverse effects at doses per body weight of up to 1.85 ml/kg·day, which is equivalent to a 70 kg person consuming about 140 g of this substance per day for 21 days. However, administration of 16.783 ml/kg·day to pregnant rats lowered body weight in male and female offspring.[7] This is equivalent to a person consuming about 1.3 kg of polysorbate 80 per day for 21 days.
Originally posted by TheGhostViking
My LOVE wil not be changed to HATE
LOVE TO YOU ALL
EXERCISE YOUR FREEDOM OF SPEECH
I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH THAT
PEACE TO YOU .
HUMANITY UNITED against the NWO !!