It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by WeRpeons
reply to post by v1rtu0s0
. But if you're talking about security of our ever expanding military in other parts of the world...
Its like putting a suit of armor on to defend yourself from pneumonia.
The Sustainable Defense Task Force unveiled its plan to cut $1.1 trillion in military spending over the next decade. Defense spending, which will reach $567 billion in 2011, is expected to top $7.4 trillion during the decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office. That does not include spending on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, which will boost 2011 defense spending to $726 billion.
Defense spending cuts will be essential as the United States struggles to bring its $13 trillion debt and $1.4 trillion annual deficit under control, members of the task force said June 11.
Originally posted by Skerrako
Sure, lets cut funding in education so that we have more illiterates, cut medicaid so old people have no choice but to slowly die, cut foodstamps so that people gradually starve, and cut housing assistance so that people have nowhere to live. BUT lets add $160 Billion dollars to the defense budget because it's in "our best interests". Its like putting a suit of armor on to defend yourself from pneumonia.
Originally posted by v1rtu0s0
This is for your security folks.
If you're against spending nearly 1 trillion on your securty, then you must not want security.
You must not want to be secure, which means you're against security, right?
Well, if you're against security, then you must be pro-violence. You must be a terrorist if you're against this spending.
Originally posted by oozyism
reply to post by MikeboydUS
Ignorance is a bless
Not arrogance