It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MrSpad
reply to post by triplescorpio
I think you are wasting your time here. All your going to get is bad science, myths, and facts found from people who make money pushing his sort of thing. Its better to let the "truthers" fight amongst themselves over just what the truth is. The fact they can all take the same evidence, add what they want, remove what they want and never agree on anything other than everyone esle is wrong or a paid agent of some secret group means you will never get anything sensible out of them. Its is kind of interesting to see how people slant things to fit their own beliefs though. Granted we see this with many events in history that have small conspiracy followings and in those cases we also see bad science and a distortion of facts and out right fabrications as well. It would be an interesting study to see to correlation on truthers views on other world events in history.
Just don't be how "they" want you to be.....you have your own mind, use it
Ah well, I should have said near free fall, but then it becomes debatable.
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by chupa-chups
Just don't be how "they" want you to be.....you have your own mind, use it
How do you know that I am not "they"?
And really, more google videos? Doesn't anyone know how to write anymore?
Originally posted by chupa-chups
Originally posted by MrSpad
reply to post by triplescorpio
I think you are wasting your time here. All your going to get is bad science, myths, and facts found from people who make money pushing his sort of thing. Its better to let the "truthers" fight amongst themselves over just what the truth is. The fact they can all take the same evidence, add what they want, remove what they want and never agree on anything other than everyone esle is wrong or a paid agent of some secret group means you will never get anything sensible out of them. Its is kind of interesting to see how people slant things to fit their own beliefs though. Granted we see this with many events in history that have small conspiracy followings and in those cases we also see bad science and a distortion of facts and out right fabrications as well. It would be an interesting study to see to correlation on truthers views on other world events in history.
Have you ever taken time out to research any of this, maybe controlled demolitions, of course your entitled to your opinion but don't be too quick to dismiss the things that happen around us.
Originally posted by MrSpad
Originally posted by chupa-chups
Originally posted by MrSpad
reply to post by triplescorpio
I think you are wasting your time here. All your going to get is bad science, myths, and facts found from people who make money pushing his sort of thing. Its better to let the "truthers" fight amongst themselves over just what the truth is. The fact they can all take the same evidence, add what they want, remove what they want and never agree on anything other than everyone esle is wrong or a paid agent of some secret group means you will never get anything sensible out of them. Its is kind of interesting to see how people slant things to fit their own beliefs though. Granted we see this with many events in history that have small conspiracy followings and in those cases we also see bad science and a distortion of facts and out right fabrications as well. It would be an interesting study to see to correlation on truthers views on other world events in history.
Have you ever taken time out to research any of this, maybe controlled demolitions, of course your entitled to your opinion but don't be too quick to dismiss the things that happen around us.
I do not dismiss things that happen around us but, when it comes to 911 my I come a much more inside view. Let me put it this way if controlled demolitions were used and I was running this as a black op I would have released to media in the early days of 911 that terrorists had also placed explosives in the buildings to help bring them down. This would be a quick and easy way to cover anything that went wrong like both planes not hitting the buildings or such or if people found explosive devices after. Of course if I was running a black op I would never have gone through all the trouble and huge risks that using planes create to begin with. I would have blown up the towers, the staue of libery and another high profile object all with explosives and effect would have been the same and reduced the number of people involved. Creating and overly complicated operation with hundreds of people the very minimum involved would not only be foolish but, also create massive opsec issues.
Originally posted by triplescorpio
Fact = there is no proof only wishful thinking?????
Originally posted by MrSpad
I think you are wasting your time here. All your going to get is bad science, myths, and facts found from people who make money pushing his sort of thing. Its better to let the "truthers" fight amongst themselves over just what the truth is. The fact they can all take the same evidence, add what they want, remove what they want and never agree on anything other than everyone esle is wrong or a paid agent of some secret group means you will never get anything sensible out of them.
Originally posted by conspiracy88
in reality you can't even really see at what point the towers hit the ground bc of the giant smoke plume that follows.