It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Xtrozero
Originally posted by TiffanyInLA
reply to post by Xtrozero
Hey Xtrozero -
You claim to be a pilot?
Which would you rather have assigning speeds for your approach?
ATC with ASR Radar?
The big question is whether or not the speed really plays into this at all since the first airplane hit at much lower speed with same results, so this means the speed means little to the end results or to the idea that reality happened differently.edit on 7-11-2010 by Xtrozero because: increase font size
Originally posted by wmd_2008
Originally posted by tortillawraps
I do not believe that those planes were hand flown. How anyone without proper training could even know how to navigate to NY let alone hit a small target at such speeds is simply impossible.
Lets see did the 2 towers just suddenly appear in front of them they would have seen them from miles away. On the gadget shown in the UK last week one of the presenters was set a challenge to learn to fly a plane, he had to take off ,complete a circuit of the airfield then land back on the runway he had 8 weeks, he was NOT allowed any time in an aicraft all training was on simulators guess what he did it!!!
Originally posted by trebor451
Originally posted by Orion7911
again they laughed and "NO WAY... NOT POSSIBLE" and said have a goodnight buddy.
"Have a good night, buddy"? lol......ok, sure. Whatever you say. Pilots who hang around the cockpit after a flight talk like that to their customers all the time. Continental company policy is for pilots to address their passengers as "buddy", "pal", "dude", "junior", "Mac" "Toots", "babe", "Sugarbritches" or "HotLips", depending on gender. The sobriquets "Sir" or "Ma'am" are optional only and are to be used only in rare instances of public conversation.
Anything you say, buddy.
Originally posted by moltquedelo
reply to post by Doctor G
I ve seen on the web (dont remmember where) it could have been done using a advanced "aircraft remote control", such device seems to exist and work like regular automatic pilot for aircraft but in a more advanced way. Also and it would makes "sense" since it seems some IT guy/network administrator from a company that had offices in the towers called the "authorities" complaning about some emmiting device disturbing the WIFI network from his office.
Such "tools" could explain the precison of the hits.
Originally posted by Orion7911
they pretty much LAUGHED at what i was asking them and almost were INSULTED that i could come up with such a story.
"To me, it's impossible, you know, any pilot that has been in a commercial jet would probably laugh if you said 510 knots."
Originally posted by Orion7911
remote control for a drone/missile, maybe...
but not a boeing 767
whatever was seen on video footage, was nothing more than CGI masking either the drone/missile, or replaced whatever WASN'T there.
Originally posted by Alfie1
This is an article from the New York Times about this subject :-
www.nytimes.com...
You will note that it includes this para : " Flying a Boeing 767 straight ahead at 1000 feet or 1500 feet would not be too difficult, even at more than 580 mph., and it would most likely not threaten the structutural integrity of the plane, a half dozen pilots and a Boeing spokeswoman said."
But accurately turning the plane at that speed and maintaining the proper pitch, or up and down movement, is difficult, the pilots said, particularly for a novice pilot, and turning at that speed would have put excessive stress on the plane.
In fact, the United plane was moving so fast that it was at risk of breaking up in midair as it made a final turn toward the south tower, traveling at a speed far exceeding the 767-200 design limit for that altitude, a Boeing official said.
[snip]
The high speed of United Flight 175 may also have complicated the hijackers' mission, because it would have been more difficult to make accurate adjustments in the plane's direction, several pilots said. Loud and repeated alarms would also have been sounding in the cockpit.
''The faster you go, the less time and room you have for error,'' said Tim O'Toole, a former 767 pilot and staff engineer in safety department of the Air Line Pilots Association.
[snip]
The typical cruise speed of a Boeing 767-200 at 35,000 feet is 530 m.p.h. The lower the plane goes, however, the thicker the air becomes, so the slower the plane must travel to avoid excessive stress.
So, here we have the manufacturers spokeswoman saying not likely to threaten structural integrity.
(Interviewer asks -) "So there's no way the aircraft could be going 500 mph at [700 ft] altitude then?"
Boeing Spokesperson Leslie Hazzard - (Laughs) "Not a chance..."
Despite this thread going on interminably nothing has been presented to indicate that UA 175 must have broken up and Boeing contradicts it.
Tiffany admits she doesn't have any evidence UA 175 was modified or substituted and so,
Originally posted by Alfie1
reply to post by TiffanyInLA
The Boeing spokeswoman is named in that article : " Liz Verdier ".
I have listened to the telephone recordings you posted on page 40 with Leslie Hazzard and Lori Berchtold and it is obvious they do not have the information to answer the repeated leading questions . Leslie when asked says " oh boy " and Lori Bechtold says " I've no idea ". I invite anyone to go back and listen and make up their own minds .
I use to blindly follow what I was told by my govt, just like you.
Originally posted by hooper
And now you blindly follow someone else. I think I see your problem. In isn't a lack if insight but a lack of eyesight.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
The business of "Pilots" for "truth" is to sell merchandise....period.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Some time ago, when a friend of mine showed me an email he received, from Rob Balsamo, on behalf of the "P4T", suggesting that for the upcoming Mother's Day he should buy his Mom some "truth", in the form of several of their crappy DVDs,
Originally posted by trebor451
lol...yeah, I received one of those emails as well. Their catch phrases are hilarious, as well..."Can't get across that ocean of doubt? Buy a set of Pilot's for 9/11 Truth DVDs for Columbus Day?"
Grandparent's day is next, I'd guess, and after that Niece and Nephew's Day. Real professional there, Tiffany, wouldn't you agree?
Originally posted by TiffanyInLA
Let us know when you are able to discuss the topic and data, You've been failing for over 82 pages.
every press release, article and technical paper published on our main website is sent to more than 100 media outlets (mainstream and alternative), airline union leadership and members (many airline union leaders/members are also members of our organization), and govt agencies.