It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
...I got a question, what is the max bank angle with the auto pilot...
wheedwhacker - can you read what it says outside the Vd line?
Originally posted by trebor451
Credibility goes to the very soul of what you are speculating, Tiff. You said
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by TiffanyInLA
wheedwhacker - can you read what it says outside the Vd line?
Can I try? It says "structural failure".
Originally posted by TiffanyInLA
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
I've contacted ALPA and alerted them to the fact that people are claiming their Officers are members of P4T.
Did you ask any of them if they think it is "easy" to control an aircraft at Vmo+150?
Originally posted by weedwhacker
It's a concentric knob arrangement; The outer knob, with white pointer arrow, is the Bank Limit Selector. "Above" it, smaller diameter (towards you) is the HDG Select knob, and the black center is the HDG Select push-button. (In case you aren't in HDG SEL mode already). Roll control has several modes.... can be HDG Hold --- and there's a button for that, and it is also a default mode in some circumstances --- Select, as mentioned, where the heading bug is in command, or the NAV tracking modes....lateral NAV ('LNAV') from the FMS computed flight plan information, or VOR Track and Localizer Track.
Now.....the Angle Limiter has priority only in HDG SEL and LNAV modes. (Though, you will see variations in the software...depends on the version. I've seen some A/Ps aggressively bank to "capture" the LNAV path. BUT, I think most have been updated by now, even the older airplanes).
However, especially with the localizer, some forethought needs to be employed to prevent the aggressive and rapid response, as the system attempts a last-second LOC capture in certain cases. Again, airline SOPs are designed towards minimizing such occurrences. An example is a large intercept angle, at a fairly high speed of closure, and when closer in to the Localizer, so that it's more sensitive. Not dangerous of course, but "sloppy" and uncomfortable for passengers. (Freight dogs don't have to care about that, I suppose....)
Anyway, with that background behind us...the A/P will overshoot the 25-degree "limit" in those instances of course capture, and rapid closure on the course at large angles.
"weak student" who "was wasting our resources."
I didn't allow him to come back. I thought, 'You're never going to make it.' www.capecodonline.com..." target="_blank" class="postlink">Source
He also was trained for a few months at a private school in Scottsdale, Ariz., in 1996, but did not finish the course because instructors felt he was not capable.Source
instructors regarded him as a poor student, even in the weeks before the attacks.
"He had only the barest understanding what the instruments were there to do"
got overwhelmed with the instruments." He used the simulator perhaps three or four more times, Fults said, then "disappeared like a fog." www.capecodonline.com..." target="_blank" class="postlink">Washington Post, 10/15/2001
"He could not fly at all." -New York Times (5/04/02)
flying skills were so bad...they didn't think he should keep his pilot's license.
" I couldn't believe he had a commercial license of any kind with the skills that he had." Peggy Chevrette, Arizona flight school manager."CBS News (5/10/02)
More here -
Click
Originally posted by trebor451
Originally posted by TiffanyInLA
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
I've contacted ALPA and alerted them to the fact that people are claiming their Officers are members of P4T.
Did you ask any of them if they think it is "easy" to control an aircraft at Vmo+150?
Did you ask any of them if a radar only tracks a target based on what has been put into a flight plan?
Did you ask any of them if an aircraft hits its "design limits" it breaks. Period. ?
Did you ask any of them what their thoughts were on a pod?
Did you ask any of them about a missile being fired at the Pentagon?
Did you ask any of them what their thoughts were regarding 757 damage at the Pentagon and that it should have displayed damage that indicated "clockwise rotation about the vertical axis due to impact angle" because that is what happens when a Radio Controlled model crashes?
Did you tell them that it is impossible for professional airline pilots to fly a 767 into a 1,300 foot tall by 208 foot wide skyscraper at 450 knots?.
Originally posted by Varemia
Why is it that almost every single source is from P4T? Why don't you have any other outside confirmation?
Originally posted by TiffanyInLA
"weak student" who "was wasting our resources."
I didn't allow him to come back. I thought, 'You're never going to make it.' www.capecodonline.com..." target="_blank" class="postlink">Source
He also was trained for a few months at a private school in Scottsdale, Ariz., in 1996, but did not finish the course because instructors felt he was not capable.Source
instructors regarded him as a poor student, even in the weeks before the attacks.
"He had only the barest understanding what the instruments were there to do"
got overwhelmed with the instruments." He used the simulator perhaps three or four more times, Fults said, then "disappeared like a fog." www.capecodonline.com..." target="_blank" class="postlink">Washington Post, 10/15/2001
"He could not fly at all." -New York Times (5/04/02)
flying skills were so bad...they didn't think he should keep his pilot's license.
" I couldn't believe he had a commercial license of any kind with the skills that he had." Peggy Chevrette, Arizona flight school manager."CBS News (5/10/02)
More here -
Click
Originally posted by TiffanyInLA
Originally posted by trebor451
Credibility goes to the very soul of what you are speculating, Tiff. You said
I agree. And you have diminished any credibility that you may have had left due to the fact you cannot debate the facts and instead prefer character assassination.
trebor - I know you're very upset, that much is clear. The walls are closing in on you. The evidence is overwhelming. Truth will always prevail.
Now, let us know when you get some evidence for your absurd argument. You're not getting any more names to trash. I think you have enough already.
Click
Keep an eye on it as from what I have heard, another major update is coming from Pilots For 9/11 Truth, and then you can perhaps continue your character assassinations with a whole new large group of real and verified aviation professionals from the comfort of your anonymity.
Originally posted by Varemia
Well Tiff, I checked the sources on this one, and guess what? Only the cbs news link worked, and it said that the guy went to flight school with two other PENTAGON terrorists. The guy referred to there was the one who hit the pentagon, not the South Tower.
I fail to see the line of reasoning that you are using.
Originally posted by trebor451
Now.....are you goign[sic] to tell us who the ALPA Officers are who are members of P4T?
Originally posted by TiffanyInLA
Flight 77 Maneuver/hanjour Flying Skills Debunked!
Originally posted by trebor451
Originally posted by TiffanyInLA
Flight 77 Maneuver/hanjour Flying Skills Debunked!
Loose Change Forum....now THERE'S a credible source. Why don't you just point someone back to P4T and eliminate the middle man? Save time and trons and would get across the same biased results.
Originally posted by roboe
Wait, I thought we were "discussing" the "impossible" speed of UA175?edit on 9-11-2010 by roboe because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TiffanyInLA
Or, you can just read the full sources here from which they originally came. It's an excellent piece of research. Very well sourced.
Flight 77 Maneuver/hanjour Flying Skills Debunked!
You fail to understand a lot of things, including original sources, basic V-G diagrams, and speeds reported. Why should this be any different?