It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
reply to post by neo96
Yes, there are conservative gays. Most - including the vaunted "log cabin" folks, are ignored or brushed aside by the rest of the conservative movement.
So yes, I agree, a gay president will most likely be a liberal president, simply because an openly gay conservative would never get the nomination from any conservative party.
Originally posted by VintageEnvy
We all know they're has been at least one gay president already.
n his book, Lies Across America, James W. Loewen points out that in May 1844, during one of the interruptions in Buchanan and King's relationship that resulted from King's appointment as minister to France, Buchanan wrote to a Mrs. Roosevelt about his social life, "I am now 'solitary and alone', having no companion in the house with me. I have gone a wooing to several gentlemen, but have not succeeded with any one of them. I feel that it is not good for man to be alone, and [I] should not be astonished to find myself married to some old maid who can nurse me when I am sick, provide good dinners for me when I am well, and not expect from me any very ardent or romantic affection.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by sos37
I think your bias on the whole gay/lesbian thing is seriously clouding your thinking on this issue.
Classic! I'm letting my bias cloud my thinking, huh? Interesting bit of projection, there.
Look, I've answered the question in the OP. I'm not interested in further arguing this point with you. You have made your feelings about gay people very clear. I just can't believe you're using some fantasy 'Muslim country holy war' scenario to justify your prejudices. Why don't you just admit it's because you hate the gays? Whatever...
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
If Ron Paul tomorrow said he was gay then yes I would still support him.
I guess I didn't think of it that way.
However if he was gay, I would hope he would keep it to himself.
As the guy above me said(above me in this post) the military might not like serving for a gay commander and chief.
Sure, attack the poster but completely ignore the validity of the posting content. Isn't that against the T&C?
You have seen in news stories how some Muslim nations treat their own when they are found to be gay, when they want to marry outside of their religion, etc. And yet you completely dismiss the possibility that this could be the "straw that broke the camel's back" when it comes to their tolerating "infidels".
Poll: 50 percent say they'd support openly gay U.S. president
Originally posted by sos37
No way would I vote for a gay president, regardless of his or her policies.
The main reason is the foreign relations nightmare it would create. Sure, France and a lot of Europe would have a more favorable impression of us, but a gay president trying to deal with Muslim-leaders and nations? Forget it. Muslim nations and other religious nations who are wholely intolerant of homosexuality would probably not want to engage in talks with our POTUS, let alone be seen in the same room with them.
Originally posted by Hadrian
would you support homophobics keeping their homophobia to themselves?
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
What exactly are you asking me here?
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I thought that was a great question by Hadrian. People don't think a thing of asking gay people to "keep it to themselves", as if it's something that they should be ashamed of, but if we were to ask homophobics to "keep it to themselves" or not voice their opinions of gay people, it's suddenly a whole different thing.
Seems homophobics' freedom of expression is just assumed. But when it comes to gay people's freedom of expression? Nah, they should just "keep it private".
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
homosexuals, at least at rallies and such, really put their sexuality in front of you.. like really!
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
it's hard to relate the two a little for me
homosexuals, at least at rallies and such, really put their sexuality in front of you.. like really!
homophobics however is a misused word
Homophobia is a range of negative attitudes and feelings towards homosexuality and people identified or perceived as being homosexual. Definitions[1][2][3] refer variably to antipathy, contempt, prejudice, aversion, and irrational fear.
Originally posted by yeahright
And once again we're at the point of taking a small sample size and using that as a labeling exercise to draw conclusions. Using the participants at the Gay Pride parades and "rallies and such" as representative of the group as a whole is even less valid (IMHO) than considering the "Wild Spring Break" videos as representative of every 20 year old female.