It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Donny 4 million
Can anyone validate that Scientist know more about creation than Hebrew scholars?
I am sorry I cannot view the video. But I will call you on this thread anyway.
I just did not understand what the poster was getting at by referencing it.
Originally posted by lightningz
christianity nor the bible makes people do nothing why pass the blame when who ever does it its all them not god not the bible them. only you make your path. stop balming god for what people do.
Originally posted by Donny 4 million
reply to post by MrXYZ
Can anyone validate your claims of CRAZY and EVIL for whatever your definition of Fundamentalist may be?
Can anyone validate that Scientist know more about creation than Hebrew scholars?
A viral infection is more obvious than a communists ability to reason faith.
I know that you agree but your master may not
If your contingent has even one sack on your side, then you can explain where the BABIES in the OP are.
YOU KNOW WHAT!!! you can NOT.
Originally posted by TELEX
But when I asked my friend how come disabled people leave the church as well as enter it. His response was to give me a look that mirrored Homer Simpson withe cymbal bashing monkey in his head.
Originally posted by K J Gunderson
Originally posted by nomorecruelty
Ok, maybe this is where the confusion is at - let's look at the definition of "kill" , "put to death" and "murder".
I can tell you right now, this is NOT where the confusion is. Let me help you. I said you god condoned murder. You said he did not. I pointed out that he advocated death for homosexuals. You said he was not instructing anyone to kill them so he did not condone murder. Then we get to the part where he does indeed instruct people to carry out stoning executions. Then you back track and say that he does ask people to kill but it is ok because he says so. This all contradicts your original point as well as the idea that no man was given authority to judge guilt or innocence.
If a person is found guilty of a crime/sin, and is justified via God/Bible for that person to suffer "death", then it would not be considered "murder".
See, this is the problem right here. Found guilty by whom? Judge not, let ye be judged right?
So who did your god grant authority to make this judgment then? You know that in the Unites States, innocent people are executed all the time. Our justice system is far from perfect so obviously you god did not mean that.
However, if it is a death caused by someone with purely malicious intent, then yes, it would be considered "murder".
Follow along with me, won't you. It is your duty to not suffer a witch to live, correct? So how do you know who is and is not a witch without committing the sin of judgment first?
For example, capital punishment - The Bible says murderers are to be "put to death". That would be the consequences (punishment) for the particular sin or crime. According to God/Bible, a murderer is to be executed, and his soul is sent directly to God for judgement.
By another man who has no god given right to judge. That make sense to you?
But does that fall under the category of "murder"? No - because it was a justified "killing" - for punishment.
Not if it was decided and carried out by another man. He among you who is without sin, cast the first tone eh? It seems to me that it is clear that you have no right to even step up to accuse, let alone judge. So who decides who deserves to be justifiably killed?
You have to remember that there are different definitions for "murder", "put to death" and "kill/killing". They are not one in the same.
I know that but a simple statement saying that you should not suffer a witch to live, is condoning murder. Just because you think god says it is ok because witches are so bad. Are you really tying to tell me that if you go kill someone with rocks because they grow herbs in their garden is not murder?
So my final answer still remains - the Bible, nor God, does not condone "murder".
So my final answer still remains - the Bible, nor God, does not condone "murder".
However, he DOES condone the 'killing' of certain people for punishment of their sins. That is the difference.
However, he DOES condone the 'killing' of certain people for punishment of their sins. That is the difference.
No, that is too simplistic. Your god is not Nixon and I think both would be insulted by the insinuation.
If a god tells you that it is your job, duty, requirement to take the life of other people just because they sinned, then he is condoning murder. People such as yourself do not even fully understand what is and is not a sin according to that book so you are certainly in no position to decide that someone should be killed for worshiping a tree. Rationalize it all you like but taking a life for any reason other than self preservation is murder.
Originally posted by K J Gunderson
Originally posted by nomorecruelty
Ok, maybe this is where the confusion is at - let's look at the definition of "kill" , "put to death" and "murder".
I can tell you right now, this is NOT where the confusion is. Let me help you. I said you god condoned murder. You said he did not. I pointed out that he advocated death for homosexuals. You said he was not instructing anyone to kill them so he did not condone murder. Then we get to the part where he does indeed instruct people to carry out stoning executions. Then you back track and say that he does ask people to kill but it is ok because he says so. This all contradicts your original point as well as the idea that no man was given authority to judge guilt or innocence.
If a person is found guilty of a crime/sin, and is justified via God/Bible for that person to suffer "death", then it would not be considered "murder".
See, this is the problem right here. Found guilty by whom? Judge not, let ye be judged right?
So who did your god grant authority to make this judgment then? You know that in the Unites States, innocent people are executed all the time. Our justice system is far from perfect so obviously you god did not mean that.
However, if it is a death caused by someone with purely malicious intent, then yes, it would be considered "murder".
Follow along with me, won't you. It is your duty to not suffer a witch to live, correct? So how do you know who is and is not a witch without committing the sin of judgment first?
For example, capital punishment - The Bible says murderers are to be "put to death". That would be the consequences (punishment) for the particular sin or crime. According to God/Bible, a murderer is to be executed, and his soul is sent directly to God for judgement.
By another man who has no god given right to judge. That make sense to you?
But does that fall under the category of "murder"? No - because it was a justified "killing" - for punishment.
Not if it was decided and carried out by another man. He among you who is without sin, cast the first tone eh? It seems to me that it is clear that you have no right to even step up to accuse, let alone judge. So who decides who deserves to be justifiably killed?
You have to remember that there are different definitions for "murder", "put to death" and "kill/killing". They are not one in the same.
I know that but a simple statement saying that you should not suffer a witch to live, is condoning murder. Just because you think god says it is ok because witches are so bad. Are you really tying to tell me that if you go kill someone with rocks because they grow herbs in their garden is not murder?
So my final answer still remains - the Bible, nor God, does not condone "murder".
So my final answer still remains - the Bible, nor God, does not condone "murder".
However, he DOES condone the 'killing' of certain people for punishment of their sins. That is the difference.
However, he DOES condone the 'killing' of certain people for punishment of their sins. That is the difference.
No, that is too simplistic. Your god is not Nixon and I think both would be insulted by the insinuation.
If a god tells you that it is your job, duty, requirement to take the life of other people just because they sinned, then he is condoning murder. People such as yourself do not even fully understand what is and is not a sin according to that book so you are certainly in no position to decide that someone should be killed for worshiping a tree. Rationalize it all you like but taking a life for any reason other than self preservation is murder.