It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Scott Creighton
reply to post by kiwifoot
Hello Kiwifoot,
You may be interested in this article by researcher, Jim Alison, who presented similar ideas back in 2001. From these ancient sites Alison calculates a former Earth pole to have been located in south Alaska.
Exploring Geographic and Geometric Relationships Along a Line of Ancient Sites Around the World
Best wishes,
Scott Creighton
Originally posted by kiwifoot
Originally posted by Scott Creighton
reply to post by kiwifoot
You may be interested in this article by researcher, Jim Alison, who presented similar ideas back in 2001. From these ancient sites Alison calculates a former Earth pole to have been located in south Alaska.
Best wishes,
Scott Creighton
Thanks Scott, I'll definitely check it out, makes me look like I robbed the idea!!!
I didn't I swear!
Misunderstanding? I believe you are correct.
If this is not the case then I don't see a connection other than the emphasis on astronomy in their architecture, however, this connection alone warrants further study in my opinion. I cannot think of any modern construction that follows this same connection, architecture and astronomy, to such an intricate degree other than maybe Arecibo Observatory. It is for this reason that I feel a huge misunderstanding about the purpose of these ancient sites is still with us.
My point is that I have failed to find an accurate description for the cause of these events. Did the gods physically do it all just to punish man or was this some natural event or a celestial disturbance? The evidence seems to always indicate a celestial interaction but whether this was space ships, gods or planets I don't know. I'm leaning towards planets personaly.
Originally posted by NibiruWarrior
The underwater pyraminds are NOT geological features!
A lot of professionals and archaeologists have dived at the sites and have confirmed that they are in fact megalithic structures similar to those around the world still above sea-level such as at Gizah, Baalbek, Machu Picchu, Chichén Itzá, Luxor, Palenque, Pumapunku, Teotihuacan, Tiahuanaco, Uxmal, Yaxchilan, Tikal, etc, etc, etc.
There are powers that actively try to hide the past, they have names also: Erosion, Withering, Decay, Plate Tectonics, Climatic Changes.
The Bible states that "celestial waters poured on the Earth for 40 days and nights", right? Yet, other records report different time spans for the cataclysm (I will go with the word I am most familiar with, "deluge" is too mystical for me), others longer and other shorter. So, which one is correct and why the differencies?
And since you know Ceres is hollow, can you alert NASA to abort their planning for a mission there to see what's going on?
From what all I have gathered the "flood" was in fact a weapon used against mankind to destroy it. And with any weapon you must aim it according to the target, and its location. I believe the flood was a controlled event.
What I do believe is that it is the "Seed" of the planet Tiamat, which no longer exists. If my suspicions are correct as to how planets form I would suggest NASA use extreme care when approaching Ceres. It may be possible for Ceres to become active once again, and mankind be allowed to see the birth of a planet. All sorts of weirdness can be expected in the next few years.
You can ridicule the theory, you can be insulting, you can offer other theories, but until you explain to me where 300 to 400 extra feet of water came from, you can not dispel the theory! It had to come from somewhere!!