It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OldThinker
Does the Central Limit Theorem prove a Creator/Deity?
Math proves Jesus Christ is the CREATOR! “For by Him all things were created, both in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities-- all things have been created through Him and for Him. He is before all things, and in Him all things hold together.” –Apostle Paul
Well, that may be a bit of hyperbole…
Well here goes…
Assumption #1: Levy's 9th law states: “Only God can make a random selection.”
Assumption #2: Have you ever heard of the “Central Limit Theorem?” - The means (X) of random samples taken from ANY distribution (mean μ and variance σ2) will exhibit an approximately normal distribution (mean μ and variance σ2/n)
In less mathematical terms, it is any of a set of weak-convergence theories. They all express the fact that a sum of many independent random variables will tend to be distributed according to one of a small set of stable distributions
Could Cicero have been right when he said, “Probability is the very guide of life.” And maybe eternity?
Also I wonder is there any connection between "theorem" and words like "theology" or "theist"?
Maybe Max Born was right? He said, “The conception of chance enters into the very first steps of scientific activity in virtue of the fact that no observation is absolutely correct. I think chance is a more fundamental conception than causality; for whether in a concrete case, a cause-effect relation holds or not can only be judged by applying the laws of chance to the observation.”
So what’s up with the CLT, huh? This is why we can predict elections, with great accuracy…way ahead of time.
Question? If randomly distributed samples, “approximate” the make-up of the population, then does the “designed” prove a “designer”?????
Any pro-God or anti-God statisticians out there? Thots?
OT
PS: Oh, btw "An infinite number of mathematicians walk into a bar. The first one orders a beer. The second orders half a beer. The third, a quarter of a beer. The bartender says "You're all idiots", and pours two beers."
Originally posted by mithrawept
Why do theists strive to prove the existence of god?
Proof denies faith. If god were to be conclusively proved wouldn't faith be meaningless? Isn't a fundamental part of Christianity that the faithful be tested without proof?
Originally posted by John Matrix
That scientists embrace evolution is more due to the government funding(the money train) than for love of science. I'm motivated to tell people that neither side can prove their theory. All either side can do is offer explanations for what they observe from the evidences.
Originally posted by Jezus
Originally posted by John Matrix
That scientists embrace evolution is more due to the government funding(the money train) than for love of science. I'm motivated to tell people that neither side can prove their theory. All either side can do is offer explanations for what they observe from the evidences.
I disagree.
Most scientists support evolution because they understand it.
Most of these debates involve people who don't really understand evolution and the biological mechanics.
This debate doesn't really exist in the scientific world, it is a political tool of semantics and rhetoric.
Originally posted by mithrawept
Why do theists strive to prove the existence of god?
Proof denies faith. If god were to be conclusively proved wouldn't faith be meaningless? Isn't a fundamental part of Christianity that the faithful be tested without proof?
Always be ready to give a defense to everyone who asks you a reason for the hope that is in you. - 1 Peter 3:15
What's the best argument we can give those who ask why we have accepted Jesus as our Savior? How can we most persuasively bear witness to our faith?
"Always be ready," Peter urged, "to give a defense to everyone who asks you a reason for the hope that is in you" (1 Peter 3:15). The Greek term for "reason" is apology. That doesn't mean a weak-kneed excuse; it means a convincing argument.
Philosopher William Alston of Syracuse University has written very helpful books in defense of the Christian faith. He has something to say that should encourage all of us: "The final test of the Christian scheme comes from trying it out in one's life, testing the promises the scheme tells us God has made, following in the way enjoined on us by the church, and seeing whether it leads to the new life of the Spirit."
Don't think that because you aren't a philosopher or a scholar that you can't be an apologist. You can bear witness to the truth and power of the gospel. Your life can be your own best argument - your best defense of your faith in Jesus Christ - to anyone who asks why you believe.
So put your faith into practice. Let people see the difference Jesus makes.
-Vernon Grounds
O that my life may useful be
As I serve Jesus faithfully;
And may the world see Christ in me -
This is my earnest prayer.
-Hess
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by Welfhard
And using arguments from science is not "appealing to authority"?
Originally posted by Maslo
OT - I have understood the CLT, but I just dont see how it disproves evolution... Can you elaborate on that?
Originally posted by John Matrix
Originally posted by Jezus
Originally posted by John Matrix
That scientists embrace evolution is more due to the government funding(the money train) than for love of science. I'm motivated to tell people that neither side can prove their theory. All either side can do is offer explanations for what they observe from the evidences.
I disagree.
Most scientists support evolution because they understand it.
Most of these debates involve people who don't really understand evolution and the biological mechanics.
This debate doesn't really exist in the scientific world, it is a political tool of semantics and rhetoric.
Most scientists support evolution because it's supports their denial of God.
The Bible states: "The fool says in his heart, there is no God."
They also support evolution to stay on the money train.
They also support evolution because it's popular to do so.
It's popular because most people are fools according to scripture, and that can be observed daily as well.
Originally posted by platipus
i believe there has to be a god if not how did everything in the universe come to be, even with that big bang nothing to something sounds a bit absurd.
Originally posted by Gixxer
Without getting to scientific Different cultures have made their own forms of mathematics. The Mayans, Indians, Greeks, and Chinese all developed seperate math systems. Our mathematics today comes mainly from ideas developed in ancient India and Greece. Algebra and other topics were taken from India to Arabia, where they were then transferred to Europe. Most of our geometry comes from the Greeks. Calculus was developed in Europe by Sir Isaac Newton.
Originally posted by John Matrix
Evolution is a religion not a science. That scientists embrace evolution is more due to the government funding(the money train) than for love of science. I'm motivated to tell people that neither side can prove their theory. All either side can do is offer explanations for what they observe from the evidences.
[edit on 15/9/09 by John Matrix]
Most scientists support evolution because it's supports their denial of God.
The Bible states: "The fool says in his heart, there is no God."
They also support evolution to stay on the money train.
They also support evolution because it's popular to do so.
It's popular because most people are fools according to scripture, and that can be observed daily as well.
Originally posted by OldThinker
Originally posted by Maslo
OT - I have understood the CLT, but I just dont see how it disproves evolution... Can you elaborate on that?
Which part my friend?
OT
People believe evolution because they want to. They want to because they don't believe in the bible or God. Pride blinds them from the truth and prevents them from seeing it.