It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Gixxer
hello,
Without getting to scientific Different cultures have made their own forms of mathematics. The Mayans, Indians, Greeks, and Chinese all developed seperate math systems. Our mathematics today comes mainly from ideas developed in ancient India and Greece. Algebra and other topics were taken from India to Arabia, where they were then transferred to Europe. Most of our geometry comes from the Greeks. Calculus was developed in Europe by Sir Isaac Newton.
now i do not think you can use something man made to prove a mythical existence it's kind of like saying " my grilled cheese sandwich looks like jesus" proof!
Originally posted by ganja
If I have misstated or misunderstood something, please let me know! i am up for conversation on this, but not arguing and childish name calling, and am glad to see this thread has remained civil, so far.
Originally posted by ganja
.....
Also this will be my last post on this thread due to the "I know more than you do" comment (especially considering the remarks you made about the etymology of certain words such as theory and theology, when they OBVIOUSLY have the same Latin roots and have to do with matters of thought...
Plato's Middle Period Metaphysics and Epistemology
Originally posted by ganja
Oh, also, my thoughts on this as a whole.. I agree that math, as we understand it, can not tell us that much about the metaphysical. math has been developed by man for wordly causes, and differs from place to place. Who is to say that OUR math is right? What we see as something whole may in fact be two halves of a "proper" measurement, or any other number of fractions or multiples. Also, as I understand it this has a bit to do with probability... Thats all well and good on paper, but things don't always work out the way that probability says they will... it can only be used as a general guide and could in no way take into account EVERY variable needed to make an accurate, 100% model of anything.
Originally posted by Gixxer
Originally posted by John Matrix
Your explanation concerning DNA and the billions of A,T, C, G, chemical instructors in every cell is proof of a creator/designer with purpose. I'm surpised the usual pro-evolutionists have not come out of the woodwork.
NO it doesn't prove anything, wake up.
Math proves Jesus Christ is the CREATOR! “For by Him all things were created, both in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities-- all things have been created through Him and for Him. He is before all things, and in Him all things hold together.” –Apostle
No it does not prove that , because "people" invented math just like people invented jesus christ otherwise there is no link between the two.
Originally posted by ganja
Ugh, i hate to do this but a certain person on here has taken it upon himself to try my patience, so sorry to disappoint you guys, but one more *FINAL* post. See this link:
www.newton.dep.anl.gov...
..and try to remember that you are indeed NOT as smart as you have led yourself to believe. It will save you further humiliations in your life.
Originally posted by TangoVooDoo
Originally posted by Gixxer
Originally posted by John Matrix
Your explanation concerning DNA and the billions of A,T, C, G, chemical instructors in every cell is proof of a creator/designer with purpose. I'm surpised the usual pro-evolutionists have not come out of the woodwork.
NO it doesn't prove anything, wake up.
Math proves Jesus Christ is the CREATOR! “For by Him all things were created, both in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities-- all things have been created through Him and for Him. He is before all things, and in Him all things hold together.” –Apostle
No it does not prove that , because "people" invented math just like people invented jesus christ otherwise there is no link between the two.
This is incorrect.
2 plus 2 equals 4 is not created but rather it's discovered. Absolutes are never created but again discovered so math was in no way made up or designed by man but was discovered by man.
Now if you argue that the name or word "math" was created then we can agree.
Originally posted by ganja
reply to post by John Matrix
Plato and Aristotle never claimed to be the son of god as far as I know... Maybe I am missing the comparison? I have no problem believing that they lived and did what they did, as those actions would be in the possibility of REALITY. When you start claiming "son of a deity," it begs questioning. Also, as far as more being written about jesus than was written about those two, you could also claim the same about "harry potter."
Originally posted by John Matrix
Originally posted by TangoVooDoo
Originally posted by Gixxer
Originally posted by John Matrix
Your explanation concerning DNA and the billions of A,T, C, G, chemical instructors in every cell is proof of a creator/designer with purpose. I'm surpised the usual pro-evolutionists have not come out of the woodwork.
NO it doesn't prove anything, wake up.
Math proves Jesus Christ is the CREATOR! “For by Him all things were created, both in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities-- all things have been created through Him and for Him. He is before all things, and in Him all things hold together.” –Apostle
No it does not prove that , because "people" invented math just like people invented jesus christ otherwise there is no link between the two.
This is incorrect.
2 plus 2 equals 4 is not created but rather it's discovered. Absolutes are never created but again discovered so math was in no way made up or designed by man but was discovered by man.
Now if you argue that the name or word "math" was created then we can agree.
Just to be clear, my post was as follows:
Your explanation concerning DNA and the billions of A,T, C, G, chemical instructors in every cell is proof of a creator/designer with purpose. I'm surpised the usual pro-evolutionists have not come out of the woodwork.
The rest of the quoted text above is not my words. I said nothing about Math being invented or discovered.
I feel a need to make that clear.
This is good,but what you have presented are mere oppinions, of people such as this Dr, Ken Melkendorf.
Originally posted by ganja
Ugh, i hate to do this but a certain person on here has taken it upon himself to try my patience, so sorry to disappoint you guys, but one more *FINAL* post. See this link:
www.newton.dep.anl.gov...
..and try to remember that you are indeed NOT as smart as you have led yourself to believe. It will save you further humiliations in your life.
Originally posted by ganja
What I mean by my comments is that man has assigned units of measure as applicable to man. The first measurements made by man were done using their own body parts, though we don't use that system anymore and have made it more exact and standardized, we still have bleed overs from old times (like how 12 inches is called a "foot"). Additionally, there exists more than one type of counting, the basic building block of our math. Binary is one example, though it is an extension of the math we already have. We decide the increments of measure, therefore we make the system, no?
]
Originally posted by Jezus
The Central Limit Theorem proves the existence of God if you consider the Universe and the domino effect of probability to be God...
But this doesn't have anything to do with intentions or purpose, it is simply the result of time and space.
Originally posted by Jezus
Math certainly was invented by people.
Even though we may feel it is concrete and absolute enough to be considered a discovery it is still a conceptual relative system created by our perception...
It is an invention.