It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Ariel Sarousi felt surprised and dismayed when asked to provide a fingerprint to cash a check at a Framingham Bank of America branch on Monday.
The 25-year-old Framingham native, who lives in Virginia, brought a rent check to the Bank of America branch on Beacon Street. He does not have an account with the bank, but the check came from a Bank of America account.
"They asked for an ID, which I provided, and after that they brought out an ink pad," Sarousi said. "I asked why, and they said they wanted to take a fingerprint. I said, 'Get out! Please!' and they said, 'No, we're serious."'
Sarousi said he had other forms of identification and that should be enough to cash a check.
"I said, 'You can't expect me to provide fingerprints to cash a check,"' Sarousi said. "I took my check and left.
Marek Tracz said he's not a criminal, but felt like one recently when he cashed a check at Bank Of America on Boston Road in Springfield. A teller informed him he needed to be fingerprinted if he wanted to cash his $450 check. Tracz said, "You would not expect a bank to ask you for a fingerprint. It makes you think, 'what are they going to ask next.'"
source
These days, you would be hard-pressed to find a Financial Institution in the United States that does not do this. Even most Check Cashing places now require a fingerprint (and charge you a 10% fee on top of it!).
I was not aware of that, as I don't deal with banks, personally. I didn't trust them before finding out about this, and I trust them even less now. There is no reason a bank needs fingerprints.
Originally posted by TheAssociate
I was not aware of that, as I don't deal with banks, personally. I didn't trust them before finding out about this, and I trust them even less now. There is no reason a bank needs fingerprints.
Heck, even some stores down here will put your fingerprint on a personal check before they will accept it.
It is not whether it is a "common practice" it is whether it invades your rights as a human. The first store that does that to me gets to put all the stuff back on the shelves.
If I had never been printed before then I'd avoid it. Just in case.
I certainly agree. Banks have too much power now.