It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Strictsum
Doesn't this also mean they could be wrong about many many other things.
If they were wrong about this and people have assumed it correct for years.
What else are they wrong about?
Originally posted by TLomon
Interesting article. Very good find. Ok, in laymen's terms... Previous scientific equations for fractal physics gave equal value to items we know are not the same.
Their new equation accurately (according to the scientists) measures differences between two outcomes, and possible speed variances.
What this means is a way to better predict disease epidemics spreading, biotoxin distribution, etc.
To sum it up, fractal physics is the study of patterns in chaos. They came up with a better formula to develop a more accurate pattern.
Originally posted by TLomon
Technically no, since global warming is a myth perpetuated by politicans with their own agendas. However, it should be useful for determining the effects of climate change.
Originally posted by jfj123
Originally posted by Strictsum
Doesn't this also mean they could be wrong about many many other things.
If they were wrong about this and people have assumed it correct for years.
What else are they wrong about?
Although anything is possible, it's doubtful. It's really not that they were wrong, their work was expanded upon and made more accurate.
Originally posted by billybobh3
Originally posted by jfj123
Originally posted by Strictsum
Doesn't this also mean they could be wrong about many many other things.
If they were wrong about this and people have assumed it correct for years.
What else are they wrong about?
Although anything is possible, it's doubtful. It's really not that they were wrong, their work was expanded upon and made more accurate.
I disagree to some extent. I'm quite sure that there are many 'truths and/or assumptions' taken for granted today that our descendents will find either horrifying or laughable; just as we do with some of the 'science' of yester years.
Humans have been completely wrong in the past and we can assume that we are better today, but we are going to be completely wrong in many areas today as viewed through tomorrow's eyes.
Originally posted by Exuberant1
This sounds like they are borrowing some of Rupert Sheldrake and Terence Mckenna's concepts.
Maybe soon the morphic field theory will go mainstream.
Originally posted by Redpillblues
Some would say that on 911 the rules of physics were broke 3 times...
Originally posted by Strictsum
What else are they wrong about?
Dr Tony Roberts and PhD student Christophe P. Haynes, from the School of Maths and Physics, showed the fractal-Einstein and Alexander-Orbach laws can fail in some instances, and have derived a new law to replace them.
Originally posted by TLomon
Interesting article. Very good find. Ok, in laymen's terms... Previous scientific equations for fractal physics gave equal value to items we know are not the same.
Their new equation accurately (according to the scientists) measures differences between two outcomes, and possible speed variances.
What this means is a way to better predict disease epidemics spreading, biotoxin distribution, etc.
To sum it up, fractal physics is the study of patterns in chaos. They came up with a better formula to develop a more accurate pattern.
The Heisenberg uncertainty principle states that location and speed of an object CANNOT be known at the same time.