It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mpriebe81
I honestly wonder just how badly Christians would freak out if a
huge Bible-Q was held.
Not that I would ever do such a thing, as I really could careless about the Bible. And there are some good stories in there, I like it more than Aesop's Fables
Some people have faaaaar too much time on their hands though, I think that we can all agree on that.
Originally posted by Kailassa
Originally posted by D1Useek
It's OK to burn the flag, but not the Koran. It's OK to burn the Bible, but not a gay book. As some would say "it's just a book". Why do they have to get permission to burn it? That should be the question. How many times have we witnessed on TV or internet the burning of flags and effigies. All sorts of things. I say burn it. It's easier to apologize for something then to ask permission.
If you believe these folk should be able to burn whichever gay book they like, I presume it's ok to take your bible from you and burn it?
Sure, it's your book, just as the book these "christians" want to burn belongs to the library.
And your bible tells the story of three gay relationships and a whole heap of hate-crimes, whereas the book these folk want to burn only tells about one.
Personally, I believe any book ordering people to kill gays, witches and "disobedient children," and having vast influence because people believe it to be the word of god, should be banned, along with religions which believe they must follow its edicts.
Originally posted by Nutter
If this goes through, I'm petitioning to be able to burn the bible.
If this goes through, I will be right beside these "Christians" and burning their precious book right in front of them. Maybe even throw a couple onto their own pile to burn.
Really amazing to see. Hopefully most of this silliness will be behind us in fifteen years.
Originally posted by The All Seeing I
People point out how silly and backwards this suit is... and even note how counter productive and hypocritical the act of a book burn would be... but very few have touched base on the infantile mentality behind such convictions. The source of which few care notice or touch on. Isn't it fair to say that for some, religion arrests their emotional and mental development?
The only way i can make sense of these people's actions is to solely look at it from a simplistic emotional level. Their fragility... sense of vulnerability backed by a congregation of hypersensitives gives them permission and encouragement to lash out in this grandiose manner. This sophomoric attention getting approach is not governed by the head... it's all heart... rules of rational thinking don't apply, this is purely a visceral response... to a perceived threat to a delicate little utopian world... called West Bend.
"Isn't that special?" ~Dana Carvey as Church Lady
Other articles of interest:
Media whores talk: right wing fringe listens
Bible thumping teacher sues school district for a cool million
Court rules 10 commandments display violates constitution
Surrounded by pagans, God still favors USA, GOP
Christian fundamentalism, domestic terrorism, and political assassination
Atheism Examiner
Birmingham Atheism Examiner
Boston Atheism Examiner
Dallas Atheism Examiner
DC Secularism Examiner
Houston Humanist Examiner
Jackson Atheism Examiner
LA Atheism Examiner
Manchester Atheism Examiner
Philadelphia Atheism Examiner
Philadelphia Critical Thinking Examiner
Portland Skepticism Examiner
Salt Lake City Freethinking Examiner
Skepticism Examiner
On Monday night, The West Bend Common Council voted for a second time not to reinstate four members of the library board because of their views. The Council upheld its April 21st decision because of the board members’ refusal to remove controversial books from the young adult section of the library prior to a formal review. The board members are accused of promoting “the overt indoctrination of the gay agenda.” The challenged books include Baby Be Bop by Francesca Lia Block, The Geography Club by Brent Hartinger, and Stephan Chbosky’s The Perks of Being a Wallflower ...
So, to recap, we have:
1. Library board members pushed out for their political/social views.
2. A lawsuit against public officials for doing their job.
3. Calls for a bonfire – of books. (And you thought Fahrenheit 451 was fiction!)
And, that’s even before the challenged books have been reviewed ...
ncacblog.wordpress.com...
Originally posted by UltraAgentGirl
Ive alerted this thread for its singling out a qroup of Americans, many of whom have fought and died for the very freedoms you enjoy to make your sweeping broad generalizations the logical fallacy of guilt by association.
Never mind their is no point to this thread and nevermind that the OP who has done a bang up job getting a bunch of mouthy atheists confusing a multi cultural country which has protections for the freedom to exercise religious points of view no different than Gays have marching down town Boston wearing a tutu carrying signs saying "I may not go down in history, but Ill go down on your DAD" such good taste these gay and atheist activists. Like the book bebop which was written to suggest more fodder for the gay agenda requiring they have "special" protections be given them as we mean nasty, stupid, ignorant, fascist , right wing extremist, abortion clinic bombing, brainwashed, republican, war mongering, hateful, bimbo-sapiennes called "xians" won't spread our "hate speech" in threads like this where we see so many of them gathering to find the most extreme example of a westburo baptist church member on a youtube video representing ALL of us in such an honest and accurate way.
It is so good to know that the website where the op links this story is nothing like the kind I see at Christians websites. I mean with all that drivel about feeding the hungry and housing the poor etc,,.
All that hatred and un-mitigated hatred at that I mean when you contrast the difference to the one the OP uses where OBVIOUSLY it is a group of people with nothing better to do than to spread peace and love of their own brand of religious zealotry.
Just check out some of the topics and contributors and we see just why such a story is taken so out of context from the real issues these people have with the public library.
Other articles of interest:
Media whores talk: right wing fringe listens
Bible thumping teacher sues school district for a cool million
Court rules 10 commandments display violates constitution
Surrounded by pagans, God still favors USA, GOP
Christian fundamentalism, domestic terrorism, and political assassination
Atheism Examiner
Birmingham Atheism Examiner
Boston Atheism Examiner
Dallas Atheism Examiner
DC Secularism Examiner
Houston Humanist Examiner
Jackson Atheism Examiner
LA Atheism Examiner
Manchester Atheism Examiner
Philadelphia Atheism Examiner
Philadelphia Critical Thinking Examiner
Portland Skepticism Examiner
Salt Lake City Freethinking Examiner
Skepticism Examiner
You know, that place, atheist Sam Harris went around suing to have the Bible removed because it offended him then bought copies of the book of wiccan and "donated" it to the same library. Yeah that be something in good taste but more than that is the taste in what we call art where atheists posted a thread here behind the guise of Christians trying to stifle freedom of speech calling a sculture of Jesus with an erection stupid art.
Did It offended them?
No worse than when atheists sue to have the nativity scene removed from public. I see another trend in society rapsthebats and it is one where atheist's mingle together just to piss people off and spread ignorance about a book they invariably don't understand and THINK they do.
Christopher Hitchens!
Originally posted by UltraAgentGirl
Ive alerted this thread for...
Originally posted by UltraAgentGirl
. . .
Then again throwing our feces at people would also have to be allowed then wouldn't it.
. . .
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Originally posted by The All Seeing I
People point out how silly and backwards this suit is... and even note how counter productive and hypocritical the act of a book burn would be... but very few have touched base on the infantile mentality behind such convictions. The source of which few care notice or touch on. Isn't it fair to say that for some, religion arrests their emotional and mental development?
The only way i can make sense of these people's actions is to solely look at it from a simplistic emotional level. Their fragility... sense of vulnerability backed by a congregation of hypersensitives gives them permission and encouragement to lash out in this grandiose manner. This sophomoric attention getting approach is not governed by the head... it's all heart... rules of rational thinking don't apply, this is purely a visceral response... to a perceived threat to a delicate little utopian world... called West Bend.
"Isn't that special?" ~Dana Carvey as Church Lady
One of the inherent dangers in the trio of Abraham’s religious sects is that Judaism, Christianity, and Islam all are centered on a ‘closed’ book with a non-communicative deity.
My Book is open quite often and has described the behaviors in coordination with the times and with uncanny accuracy where even the likes of you is written about pegging you to a tee as if it was written right after I spyed your ad-hom laden post so rife with ridicule and so ignorant of what you THINK you understand. The Bible says "their is nothing new under the sun" and nails it as I see how unimpressive your suggestion the closed book is holding those who subscribe to its ever revealing truths, that when it says men in the last days although they profess themselves wise, they are as fools and God allows them to get lost in their delusions.
Men with advanced souls and men with a quality education, men with honor and maturity, do NOT write such things as you have to disparage me and my adhearance to my book with its revelation.
They don't cheaply enhance their ego by belittling the faithful and they don't assume to know what it is they have never lived but vicariously and through the fettered clutter of their own brand of bigotry and hatred.
To be so presumptuous as I have seen you display yourself to be, is it any wonder why the best you can do to substantiate your extreme prejudice is by insult and ridicule of so many you have never met and never will who have done nothing to you other than to follow a lifestyle much harder to accomplish and so much easier to critcize while you have no Chrtistian reputation to live up to, I have seen what that book and its teachings have done for so many and have also seen what happens when the laws God created for man to follow, are not to deprive anyone of their chance to read a book about a troubled guys issues with his oh so important sexual identity and the way he will rationalize his next tete e tete with some sin empowered follower of his own self centered indulgence, it will inevitably be US he seeks to gain our approval and he will be rebuked as he should be as the supposition for even thinking he should ask US is,, well, quite telling indeed. Conversely I see yet another book written by men which is always open as it continues to edit the paradigms of a science so elastic from so many many manufactured attempts to substantiate it as theory with hoax after hoax after hoax she is a changing yet again the ever lying illusion of darwinian evolution.
I read the props my interlocutors so easily impressed by your syrupy ad-hom prose, however, I see in you that of the creatures of this allegedly evolving species of man, in spite of the gains in equality the advances in science nd technology, in spite of all we think we have accomplished and are so impressed with ourselves for acheiving. We have gained nothing and you will still die and within a blink of an eye nothing you have ever said will have mattered and even that doesn't matter either. For in the final analysis what I believe is important, you see as pathetic making me and all those who share the same ideology and worldview, one thing is certain as certain as I am sharing a seat with my rear end is this so apparent.
That when it comes to man,,
Nothing has changed,
nothing at all
Originally posted by Kailassa
Originally posted by UltraAgentGirl
. . .
Then again throwing our feces at people would also have to be allowed then wouldn't it.
. . .
Your post makes it perfectly obvious that throwing (virtual) faeces is allowed.
Excuse me while I go take a shower.
Do you suggest we should hold you, with your hatred of gays, justification of murder, and inability to express yourself in a rational manner, as being typical of the Christians who I think you might be trying to defend?
Or are you trying to ridicule Christians by pretending to be one and making an absurdly long, convoluted and hateful mish-mash of a post?
Originally posted by Witness2008
reply to post by UltraAgentGirl
More freedom of speech. These links will give you a good idea as to how a lot of folks see Christianity www.youtube.com...
www.youtube.com...
If you decide to view just one link, make it this one www.youtube.com...
[edit on 14-6-2009 by Witness2008]