It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by turbofan
Where`s Ryan Mackey`s chemistry Ph.D.?
You have posted nothing there but speculation; this is just him yapping
and creating theories.
[...]
At best Mackey is discussing the application of thermite which we have already concluded was not the only source of energy used to destroy the tower.
THis thread is not to debate how the thermite was applied, but rather
why it is present in the towers to begin with
Originally posted by turbofan
Look up Nils Andersen. That's real.
Plain and simple you are not getting dust samples unless you are
part of a recognized organization.
www.controlled-demolition.com...
CDI had to sever the steel in the columns and create a delay system which could simultaneously control the failure of the building’s 12 different structural configurations,
[..]
Under CDI direction, Homrich/NASDI’s 21 man crew needed three months to investigate the complex and four months to complete preparations for CDI’s implosion design.
[...]
Double column rows installed in the structure between vertical construction phases, internal brick shear walls, x-bracing, 70 elevators and 10 stairwells created an extremely stiff frame. Columns weighing over 500 lb/ft, having up to 7.25 inch thick laminated steel flanges and 6 inch thick webs, defied commercially available shaped charge technology. CDI analyzed each column, determined the actual load it carried and then used cutting torches to scarf-off steel plates in order to use smaller shaped charges to cut the remaining steel.
CDI’s 12 person loading crew took twenty four days to place 4,118 separate charges in 1,100 locations on columns on nine levels of the complex. Over 36,000 ft of detonating cord and 4,512 non-electric delay elements were installed in CDI’s implosion initiation system, some to create the 36 primary implosion sequence and another 216 micro-delays to keep down the detonation overpressure from the 2,728 lb of explosives which would be detonated during the demolition.
Originally posted by turbofan
... nobody has challenged his science, they just hide and smack talk
from a keyboard and claim "discredited".
Originally posted by turbofan
Bump for exponenet, or any other GL that can explain this:
Originally posted by turbofan
Bump for exponenet, or any other GL that can explain this:
Originally posted by turbofan
reply to post by exponent
Here are a few stop images. Study them well, and please don't try to
deny the solid visual proof that the top section destroys itself before
the support structure (red line) begins to descend:
procision-auto.com...
procision-auto.com...
procision-auto.com...
procision-auto.com...
procision-auto.com...
procision-auto.com...
Go ahead 'exponent', try to talk your way around the linked photos.
Please explain how gravity smashes the section above the impact
hole, without crushing the 1000 foot of tower.
P.S. If you have been following my logic and watched some of the
video evidence, you would know that I believe there were multiple
sources of energy destroying the towers. Therefore, the explosions
you hear / see in the independent footage would indicate something
more than thermiate was used.
Mike, what other terms would you like? You can submit a peer reviewed
paper; you can sign up at the forum linked; or you can submit an e-mail
with all of the particular outlined in the challenge.
Come on, what are you guys waiting for, there's $1000.00 up for grabs here!
Originally posted by turbofan
Mike, what other terms would you like? You can submit a peer reviewed
paper; you can sign up at the forum linked; or you can submit an e-mail
with all of the particular outlined in the challenge.
Come on, what are you guys waiting for, there's $1000.00 up for grabs here!
extruther.blogspot.com...
NIST did not examine the Tower’s collapses after the point of collapse initiation because after the exterior walls began buckling and the top of the buildings began tilting when the buckling spread to the core and remaining perimeter columns allowing the building top to begin falling straight down, the chaotic impacts of heavy floors and walls colliding could not possibly have been accurately predicted by even the most powerful computers. NIST only examined the collapses to the point where progressive collapse would have been inevitable and this took intense computer work.
Those WTC Tower buildings were built with long span, bar joist floor trusses which can collapse into catenaries (cables in suspension) from the expansion effects of heat on the steel truss components. Steel expands immediately when heated. NIST found that the differential expansion effects between the composite steel and concrete in the floors causes separation of the concrete and steel trusses and buckling of the diagonal struts in the trusses. This catenary effect starts at low temperatures of 4000 C to 5000 C before the steel itself even begins to weaken. This collapse the trusses into catenaries over several floors along with the additional ‘thermal bowing’ effect in some of the trusses, caused ‘pull-in’ forces on the exterior wall columns. Thermal bowing is caused by the bottom chords of the trusses expanding faster than the top. This allows the top chord to go into suspension exerting immediate increasing ‘pull-in’ forces on the exterior walls. Photos taken by the Police helicopters showed the exterior column walls in the Towers to be bowing inward, on the long span sides of both buildings well before the buildings started to collapse.
Added to the thermal weakness of the ‘long span’ trusses present in the Tower’s design was the absence of diagonal bracing in the core, the weak column splices in both the perimeter and core columns, one bolt connections of the truss to core columns, missing bolts in the exterior column splices, large open areas allowing extensive fire growth and enabling large areas of the buildings to be affected by heat, weak plaster board enclosures for stairways and elevator shafts, etc., etc.
Building 7 had all the same deficiencies present in the Towers except that the bar joist, trusses were replaced with long span I beams. There were large growing fires on several floors as well as damage from the exterior columns of Tower 1 which pealed away during its collapse and hit the southwest corner and the middle of the south side of building 7, gouging out large sections. In addition to this damage, there were problems with water supply and the Fire Department decided not to fight these fires and ordered every one out of the building and out of the collapse zone (which was a large area including buildings and streets around building 7) as is the procedure when discontinuing interior firefighting operations at an uncontrolled fire. The anticipation of collapse was a brilliant conclusion and no lives were lost when the 47 story building collapsed about an hour and a half after the evacuation order was given. The BBC somehow misheard the orders to evacuate the collapse zone and reported the building had already collapsed well before it actually did.
Arthur Scheuerman,
Retired Battalion Chief, FDNY
Originally posted by mmiichael Why is it so important someone out of nowhere confronts him?
Originally posted by turbofan
Why is it so important that everyone flaps their opinion around here
like they know something, but are chicken to face the 'man'?
It's important to me (and other I'm sure) to weigh the credibility of
the anonymous internet users who claim the paper is wrong...yet offer
nothing to support their claim.
Originally posted by turbofan
Jones says to ignore those that hide behind internet alias...
maybe I should take his advice.
Originally posted by mmiichael
As detailed below, bringing down a building of unusual height and breadth requires thousands of precisely positioned explosives and co-ordinated and split second timing.
Originally posted by esdad71
Talking in circles as usual. You have nothing else.
Also, you are wrong about Jones and his credibility. This is ALL in your head...yours and a few of the truthers that are left.
Do you know about his cold fusion research? Look it up.
He is an agent of the government that is blowing sunshine to those who will listen.
The only proof of thermite is from burning dust and publishing to a non peer reviewed site that the owner attempted to retract what was posted.
Originally posted by mmiichael
For a chaser, there is a definitive book on skyscraper fires “Fire in the Skyscraper” by Arthur Scheuerman, previously Batallion Chief of the New York Fire Dept.
NIST did not examine the Tower’s collapses after the point of collapse initiation because after the exterior walls began buckling and the top of the buildings began tilting when the buckling spread to the core and remaining perimeter columns allowing the building top to begin falling straight down
Photos taken by the Police helicopters showed the exterior column walls in the Towers to be bowing inward, on the long span sides of both buildings well before the buildings started to collapse.
...missing bolts in the exterior column splices,
The anticipation of collapse was a brilliant conclusion
The BBC somehow misheard the orders to evacuate the collapse zone and reported the building had already collapsed well before it actually did.