It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Reheat
The "truther" John Farmer has posted a Utube video of a mix of Reagan National TRACON Radar and the ATC Communications proving yet again the 84th RADES data is correct. The AA77 flight path and the C-130 flight path are in accordance with what the 9/11 Commission concluded.
CIT's nonsense is "blown out of the water" again.
NEADS 25.3 Second Time Difference Explained (Or, "I hate it when Craig is Right")
I told my nemeses at CIT that if I found evidence of tampering in the 84 RADES data that they would be the first to know and I am a man of my word. The NEADS clock was NOT running slower on 9/11. Rather its radar data was being collected, altered, and then fed into the system.
-John Farmer
Friday, April 11, 2008 3:31 AM
"I've caught them lying out the teeth buddy! (laughs) I mean what really convinced me beyond a shadow of a doubt was the NTSB data. That is such an obvious misinformation campaign right there it isn't even funny. That stuff is so doctored. It just isn't even funny."
"The first thing I noticed in 3Ding is the Pentagon gate cameras....no way, no way. Ok that plane came in and hit those two poles, it had a certain angle of attack coming in. Ok...the Pentagon gate cameras have the thing sittin' on the ground. Naw naw naw that's not even reality."
-John Farmer via recorded phone call
Listen to call here
Originally posted by ThroatYogurt
reply to post by Craig Ranke CIT
I will listen to a professional like Reheat
You have responded with NOTHING to dispute him.
You all but called Lloyd the elderly cab driver a liar and claim he is somehow working for the government.
Have you even bothered to look for anyone that was near him that would corroborate his statements? (The gentleman that was driving the white Saturn for instance)
ALL of your witnesses that were in a position to see the Pentagon SAW THE IMPACT. Some describe in great detail what they saw. But you hand wave that and state that they were deceived.
You refuse to address professionals when they tell you that ALL the flight paths that your witnesses have come up with are not possible, o.
You refuse to debate realistically, regarding the physical evidence at the
Pentagon.
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
Prove he is a "professional".
Did you know he has now officially agreed that the NoC flight path IS possible?
What is there to dispute?
He believes the north side flight path is possible and this is what all the witnesses unanimously support!
All BUT. Exactly.
The evidence proves the plane was nowhere near that pole and his story is physically impossible.
Believe me we would LOVE to talk to any of these guys.
Let me know if you can find out who any of them are.
What's more logical....mass hallucination or mass deception?
Huh?
No "professionals" have said that!
Really?
I challenge you to a recorded phone debate.
Is tonight good for you?
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
Did you know he has now officially agreed that the NoC flight path IS possible?
Exponents' example posted earlier is just an example. He only used two of the witnesses to show the ONLY possible flight path that could be flown North of the Citgo Station. Even it shows high bank angles and high G that NO ONE DESCRIBED. However, when all of the witnesses are put together and multiple flight paths at varying speeds are attempted they ALL FAIL.
Google Video Link |
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
1. Robert Turcios saw it "pull up".
2. Maria De La Cerda thought it hit "on top".
Roosevelt Roberts Jr. saw it banking around and flying away from the building immediately AFTER the explosion.
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
He agrees that it IS possible for a plane to bank north of the citgo!
Funny how now he has to rely on the witnesses again since now he has acknowledged that the MATH proves the flight path IS possible!
I didn't think you would have enough courage to debate me.
We can do it tomorrow or the next day if that's better for you.
No reason for me to debate exponent since he also agrees that the NoC banking flight path as reported by the witnesses is possible.
Originally posted by ThroatYogurt
I didn't think you'd have the courage to debate anyone with knowledge of aviation. (which I clearly do not)
Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
John Farmer, the one who put together this completely inconclusive video that does not even remotely contradict what we report, has already declared the Radar data, the NTSB data, AND the security video ALL MANIPULATED!