It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SectionEight
The NYTimes is an Obama slanted paper that pretends to be journalism. How is this allowed under the new rules as a source?
Would I be allowed to post the most recent Rasmussen Report that puts McCain ahead and the accompanying editorials that attempt to interpret the polls on why McCain/Palin are the next best thing since sliced bread?
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
The choice of a relative unknown in the last 8 weeks before the election leaves very little time to have the country get to know who this new candidate is. It's their right to fully scour any past political actions that Palin has taken as it give us an idea of how she would act in the office of Vice-President and quite likely the office of President.
This public inquiry and revelation is NOT "sexist" or "unfair". That charge is just distraction.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
And I am glad we're discovering more of who she is.
"I understand why I had to go," Mr. Bitney said. "I accept that. I was in the governor's office and a trusted adviser. I betrayed that trust by not being forthcoming about what was going on in my personal life."
Originally posted by marg6043
This will match very well the issue of Palin abusing her office powers for personal vendetta.
Let me bring back he subject for those that still think this is all about bashing Palin as a public figure.
Alaska police union files complaint against Palin
deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com...
When I first looked upon her credentials for as the Governor of Alaska it seemed to be honest and clear.
But then upon more research is obviously some problems that she created due to her personal handling of family matters.
A person that can not control her temper or demeanor in a public office where he or she is in charge due to personal vendettas can not possible be able to handle the power that a higher office like the VP or president can Bring.
Originally posted by loam
Well, I completely disagree. In fact, in terms of fairness, I think this puts logic on its head.
The NY Times piece reads like a hit piece with little evidence showing how they arrived at their conclusions or even what relevance some of their "facts" have.
It's because we have such a short period of time, we should not fall victim to hysteria generated by inaccurate reporting.
You act as if she's never been vetted to begin with.
She was elected Governor and enjoys considerable Alaskan approval ratings.
Are you suggesting Alaskans failed to discover her five heads?
What special expertise do you suppose the national media has to discover Palin's infirmities beyond those already considered by the Alaskans who happen to know her best?
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by loam
Well, I completely disagree. In fact, in terms of fairness, I think this puts logic on its head.
You don't think it's fair or logical to want to know the political decisions made in the past by the person who may just become our president? Is that what you're saying?
Originally posted by loam
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
You act as if she's never been vetted to begin with. I'd like to point out the obvious: She was elected Mayor twice. She was elected Governor and enjoys considerable Alaskan approval ratings.
Originally posted by loam
Yeah, BH. That's what I'm saying.
Let's cover the real points you believe the article shows. Maybe that would be more productive.
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
From everything I've read, she's less corrupt than many, more corrupt than some. What can we do?
Originally posted by ChocoTaco369
Obama has NEVER been vetted by the media.
They have asked Palin 10 times more questions in the past 2 weeks than Obama has been asked in the past 19 months,