posted on Dec, 10 2008 @ 04:03 PM
Originally posted by nixie_nox
It could also be that the government feels that they have enough anti-missle systems that they don't feel shelters are necessary.
Well what i have heard here in finland the reason is mad policy. there is no need for shelters, because usa is prepared to kill its population in
nuclear war. Means USA have nothing to loose, so the enemy must be prepared to that USA will hit its whole arsenal on the table from the zero moment.
So basicly in nuclear war usa tries to kill as much of enemy population and infrastructure as possible, before its arsenal is destroyed. This because
you are so jealous you can't let others live when you die.
all this is for to tell others, that usa don't bluff with their nuke arsenal. mad isn't it
If you hit we die, but we will take as much of you
with us as possible. ps. we make sure it is enough to destroy you totally as well. basicly kamikaze defence.
very stupid, but guite working at the political view point. Bad in that system error can cause apocalypse, as nukes must be launched at enemy launch
warning. works only with nukes. lots of nukes. takes lot of unneccessary resources, which could be used in something usefull.
about system errors:
www.pbs.org...
So those anti-missile systems are just cosmetics, untill you have capability to take out 99% of those hundreds of missiles at 99% success rate. no one
has that capability yet, when you have i suggest you throw mad to trashbin.
(add here that einstein quote about sticks rocks and WW4.)