It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by toasted
You mean, you'd only vote for them if their names were on the ballot?
Originally posted by Andrew E. Wiggin
Yeah, and Charles Manson raped and murdered little boys
Does he not have a constitutional right, as laid forth by the constitution?
Originally posted by Andrew E. Wiggin
Steal? They pay lets say 1 million in taxes and profit ... 100 million....yeah!!! they're hurting.......
The Clintons paid nearly $34 million in taxes over the last seven years -- 31 percent of their adjusted gross income.
There is some common ground between the two plans. Both candidates agree that the elements of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts primarily affecting those with incomes below $250,000 should be extended, that the estate tax should be substantially reduced but not repealed, and that the research credit should be made permanent (though Senator McCain would change the formula by which it is calculated). Both candidates would continue to limit the number of taxpayers affected by the AMT but would not repeal it.
The Obama plan includes several provisions that do not provide additional tax benefits, but do affect the tax benefits individuals receive and how they interact with the tax code. An important example is the proposal to mandate automatic enrollment in 401(k) plans and require employers who do not offer them to establish automatic IRAs. These proposals apply the findings of recent research that shows people are much more likely to contribute to retirement saving plans if they are automatically enrolled, with an option to opt out, than if they have to make an active decision to participate.
Obama’s proposals to tax carried interest as ordinary income, limit international corporate tax shelters, improve information reporting, apply the “economic substance doctrine” to business transactions, and reduce the tax gap could all improve economic efficiency by reducing the incentive to engage in purely tax-motivated transactions.
If enacted, the Obama and McCain tax plans would have radically different effects on the distribution of tax burdens in the United States. The Obama tax plan would make the tax system significantly more progressive by providing large tax breaks to those at the bottom of the income scale and raising taxes significantly on upper-income earners. The McCain tax plan would make the tax system more regressive, even compared with a system in which the 2001–06 tax cuts are 35 made permanent. It would do so by providing relatively little tax relief to those at the bottom of the income scale while providing huge tax cuts to households at the very top of the income distribution.
Originally posted by Slazer
On taxes this is what I think. If I made lets say 100 million a year and I did it LEGALLY, then I should be able to keep the fruits of my labor, no one should take more money from me because I earned that money from hard work!! That's the thing, people in this country think that they are OWED something, just because they live below average, when in probably more than 75% of the cases, they are in that situation because of their own doing. And just so you know, I only make 35,000 a year.
[edit on 7-7-2008 by Slazer]
Who was it who said they'd pull the troops out of Iraq in 16 months, and is now hedging on that pledge with the lame excuse of needing to check on ground conditions before making a final decision?
Originally posted by evanmontegarde
Hmmm...Who was it that started the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, the first major military conflicts the United States has been involved in since Vietnam (Cold War not counted as a whole)? Who wants to continue those wars and have a permanent occupation of Iraq for "100 years"?
You have to at least give McCain credit for being honest about his intentions. He never tried to pull the wool over everyone's eyes with a few Clintonesque phrases just to get their vote.
Originally posted by Andrew E. Wiggin
reply to post by LLoyd45
Who was it that said
bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran?
and
"100 years, if thats what it takes"
:shk:
even if it takes Obama 4 years to rid the war, its still 96 years soon than McCain.
Originally posted by Andrew E. Wiggin
reply to post by Slazer
The supreme court huh? care to offer us where you get your information? I can't wait to read it......because i've never heard of it, and surely can't find it.