It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Alxandro
Hatred for Bush aside, think about it.
So freakin' what!
International law does not apply to terrorists that don't know how to play by the book and hide behind innocent women and children, so quit being such a freakin' sympathizer.
Can you name just one indiividual that has died from waterboarding?
... didn't think so.
Originally posted by Maxmars
Originally posted by Alxandro
Hatred for Bush aside, think about it.
So freakin' what!
International law does not apply to terrorists that don't know how to play by the book and hide behind innocent women and children, so quit being such a freakin' sympathizer.
Can you name just one indiividual that has died from waterboarding?
... didn't think so.
Yes.
Part 1, Article 1 and the US Reservations of the UN Convention Against Torture: The term "torture" means any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession
International law does not apply to terrorists that don't know how to play by the book and hide behind innocent women and children, so quit being such a freakin' sympathizer.
Can you name just one indiividual that has died from waterboarding?
Originally posted by Alxandro
reply to post by biggie smalls
Be that as it may, torture still works.
You knew it was being done, why so surprised now that it's official?
Originally posted by Alxandro
Be that as it may, torture still works.
The Government broadly contends that Congress may grant
the Executive almost unchecked authority to imprison people
it labels as “enemy combatants” without ever charging them
with (or presenting evidence of) offenses and without allow-
ing any court to conduct an independent inquiry into the
legality of their detentions. Petitioners, on the other hand,
ask only that the Court enforce the structural guarantee of the
Suspension Clause that an independent court be allowed to make a meaningful determination of the legality of Executive
detention, except in those extraordinary circumstances where
Congress has lawfully suspended habeas corpus. Petitioners
do not ask this Court to determine whether they have been
lawfully imprisoned; they merely ask that they be allowed to
seek federal court review of the legality of their detention in
habeas proceedings required by the Constitution.
You knew it was being done, why so surprised now that it's official?
Originally posted by budski
Originally posted by Alxandro
reply to post by biggie smalls
Be that as it may, torture still works.
You knew it was being done, why so surprised now that it's official?
Torture works?
Really?
Do have evidence to support this?
I'm pretty sure that if someone were pulling your fingernails out, you'd tell them whatever they wanted to hear just to get them to stop, whether real or imagined.
It's also been proved pretty conclusively that torture doesn't work - information gained by the use of torture is nearly always worthless.
ANALYSIS
Torture does not yield reliable information.
Nearly every torture survivor at the Center for Victims of Torture (CVT), when subjected to torture, confessed to a crime they did not commit, gave up extraneous information, or supplied names of the innocent to their torturers. It is a source of great shame for them, who tell us they would have said anything to stop the pain. Such extraneous information distracts, rather than supports, valid investigations.
Military interrogators know that torture does not work.
Military interrogators know torture produces false information and wastes valuable resources. A report commissioned by the Intelligence Science Board[1] concludes that painful and coercive interrogation techniques hinder the ability to get solid, factual information. Coercive techniques have been abandoned by the military because evidence suggests that intelligence successes are a result of the verbal acumen of our field interrogators, not the use of torture.
Torture is not used only against the guilty.
The torture survivors CVT serves are living testimony that once used, torture becomes a fishing expedition to find information. It perverts the system which, seeking shortcuts to the hard work of investigation, relies increasingly on torture. Whenever a democratic government has allowed torture for rare instances, torture has become widespread and routine.
Originally posted by goosdawg
And one wonders why these indifferent, arrogant, puppet criminals show zero respect towards the vast majority of people they are Constitutionally bound to serve?
[edit on 11-4-2008 by goosdawg]
Originally posted by Alxandro
Hatred for Bush aside, think about it.
So freakin' what!
International law does not apply to terrorists that don't know how to play by the book and hide behind innocent women and children, so quit being such a freakin' sympathizer.
Can you name just one indiividual that has died from waterboarding?
... didn't think so.
Originally posted by CX
This guy and his administration never ceases to amaze me.
I'd never wish the use of torture on anyone, friend or foe, but next time i hear of one of our guys having been tortured, beheaded or whatever, i really don't think i will be able to feel as disgusted as i used to.
If we do it and think it's fine, who are we to moan when they do it to our guys?
Bush is a prize tool, i swear to God that guy is a monkey that has been put in a suit and strategicaly shaved!
CX.