It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
and if you want substitute the Australian references for US or others. And for that matter the Asian clients for anyone else with the cash and a potential future axe to grind against western or western equiped airforces.
Asian countries advise of being tired of loss-of-face from domination of air by Australia’s Hornet and F-111. New aircraft come onto Asian region and old Hornets and F-111 retire, so balance of power in air combat can change. American dollar is falling like broken lift, but even so Russian aircraft remain still much cheaper. Asian clients ask me - can Russian aircraft do the job over Super Hornet and F-35 JSF? Is acceptable by them to post APA NOTAM – Asian clients say give back face.
Originally posted by The Winged Wombat
If one follows Westpoint23's or West Coast's arguments, then the Malaysians must be imbeciles (which they aren't) for selecting Su-30 over the Super Hornet - they could afford either and both were offered. If the Super Hornet is superior then this does not make any sense at all - unless the the US was only offering such a downgraded Super Hornet that the Su-30 was the better solution - an example of forcing the customer into someone else's arms (pun intended), or a delusion that a downgraded Super Hornet is superior to the Su-30 (as offered). What makes these correspondents believe that they know more about Su-30 (for example) than the people who bought it in preference to US equipment?
when Super-Fries carry weapons and tanks on pylons, see about 200 km with N011M radio-location system
Can dance around outside Super-Fries' missile range and use Sukhoi radio network [Editor: TKS-2 intraflight digital radio datalink / network] to make sure no Sukhois in range of Super-Fries' missile
Omega advisor in back of Sukhoi help here as fighter controller
Stay until Super-Fries reach Bingo [Editor: only fuel remaining to get home] and run for home – cannot escape at Mach 1.6 when Sukhoi make 2.35 – take R-77 or R-27 in pants
Two seat combat aircraft better – make space for some more Omega advisors to help fight
Originally posted by The Winged Wombat
If one follows Westpoint23's or West Coast's arguments, then the Malaysians must be imbeciles (which they aren't) for selecting Su-30 over the Super Hornet...
Originally posted by Daedalus3
the Su-30 can outsee and outshoot the superbug at BVR;
Originally posted by Daedalus3
it can outmanuever the superbug at WVR.
Originally posted by The Winged Wombat
...wait for the fighters to launch and then turn away, stay outside their range until they head home on bingo fuel and come cruising back in.
Originally posted by The Winged Wombat
I am interested in why you think that Malaysian aircrew would be less capable or less well trained than US crews.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Originally posted by Daedalus3
it can outmanuever the superbug at WVR.
The maneuvering capabilities of the Flankers are questionable when combat loaded and the Super Hornet is no slouch, then there's also the AIM-9X and JHMCS.
Originally posted by The Winged Wombat
...wait for the fighters to launch and then turn away, stay outside their range until they head home on bingo fuel and come cruising back in.
Originally posted by Canada_EH
Can you expand? I tend to agree with you on this point since really its a roll of the dice to see who gets the upper hand in this style of engagement.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Second "tier" fighter? Only to select 5th generation few. The article is flawed and focuses on very questionable premises and parameters while ignoring current and near term future capabilities. Talk, as they say is cheap but the good Colonel needs to make a good buck from it.
Originally posted by FredT
What would you expect the good Colonel to say? We would get smoked?