It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bokinsmowl
insanity is defined as performing the same action over and over expecting a different outcome.
Originally posted by CalmStateOfMind
...They thought of ways to fix the problem, and the easiest and fastest, most permanent way has been killing. So I would have to say that I disagree.
quote: Originally posted by bokinsmowl
insanity is defined as performing the same action over and over expecting a different outcome.
So do u think dharmer was insane? he killed 17 men in the same way.
Originally posted by thesneakiod
Are there degrees in insanity or is it straight down the line?
Originally posted by Enkidu
Originally posted by thesneakiod
Are there degrees in insanity or is it straight down the line?
Many degrees. Just like there are many degrees of having a cold, or a broken leg. We're talking about illness here, for the most part.
Overall, however, society and consensus determine what is sane and what is insane.
Say you are haunted by bat monkey demons. Now, society has pretty much determined that there are no such things as bat monkey demons, and if you claim to be haunted by them, you're probably nuts. That being said, society doesn't know everything, and just because they've never been haunted by bat monkey demons, doesn't mean they can't exist. Maybe you have something in your brain that sees into other dimensions where bat monkey demons are common as weeds. So technically, you know the truth and reality of the situation. But it doesn't matter. To society, you're still nuts, and they'll give you all kinds of therapy and drugs and lock you up until you can convince them you no longer see the bat monkey demons. That's just the way things work in this world.
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
I don't think so.
First, you'd have to completely define sanity. Then, everything that falls outside the boundaries is by definition insane. (should be 'outsane', but whatever)
Sanity is a mixed bag, depending on what time period you're working with, and what cultures you consider. I think the crusaders were insane. In fact, I think all religious zealots are insane. If I was unlucky enough to be alive in the 1600's, popular opinion would have labeled me the insane one.
Just something to consider...
Also, I think there's an extreme sort of sanity that you can't ignore. For example, killing someone to take their job, or their mate, or their property. That's pretty much standard operating procedure in nature, but in human society you're likely to be labeled insane if you engage in those behaviors.
How about killing your own kids? Animals do it all the time, to insure their own survival in lean times (you can always have more kids, if you can keep yourself alive long enough), and to clean the gene pool. When a person kills their kids in modern society, we label them insane, no matter what their reasoning was. But of course, all throughout history there have been numerous societies where infanticide was accetable, or even mandatory in some circumstances (deformities, birth marks, etc..)
So I don't know if it's a question of insanity, so much as it's a question of social mores - which are, of course, quite arbitrary, depending on your circumstances.
Originally posted by Spiderj
This is like those Jeff Foxworthy "You might be a red neck jokes". For instance, if you murder someone for sleeping with your wife and stealing all your money, you're probably not insane but...
If you murder someone so you can cook their heart and absorb their power...you might be crazy.
If your mother tells you to clean up your room but the chain smoking bat monkey demon who lives in your closet tells you to light the house on fire...you might be crazy.
If you think sending the girl you have a crush on a hermetically sealed jar of your urine is the perfect way of saying "I like you"...you just might be crazy.
Or something like that.
Spiderj
[edit on 8/10/2006 by Spiderj]
Originally posted by Essedarius
If a woman decides to slaughter her kids because she wants to hang out with a hunky guy who doesn't like kids...her premise (getting rid of her children), while despicable, is logical...therefore her actions, while outrageous and hideous, could be considered sane.
Originally posted by thesneakiod
Isnt killing your kids illogical whatever the reason? To do it, meaning planning it and going through with it, is IMO insane because she can't see that the act is hideous to the eyes of the world. Remember, she could simply leave her kids for her hunky man.
Originally posted by Enkidu
"Sanity" is me killing you for believing in Mohammed.