It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Kingalbrect79
...how effective do you think it will be against the long-range missles?
it certainly can't stand up to a newer vessel..
Originally posted by Char2c35t
how about rocket assisted 16inch new fire control systems new powerplant maybe even fewer sailors due to modernization, new aa and stealth!
There are no ships that could stand a 16" shell hit!
Maybe the 16inch guns can fire emp shells?
Originally posted by Kacen
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't they already stop using the big battle cruisers quite a long time ago? Like in the 1980's?
Ether way, there just doing what all armies are doing. Sacrificing armor, size, and brute force for speed, stealth, and precision.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Originally posted by Kacen
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't they already stop using the big battle cruisers quite a long time ago? Like in the 1980's?
Ether way, there just doing what all armies are doing. Sacrificing armor, size, and brute force for speed, stealth, and precision.
Actually it was around 1991. USS Missouri was in GW1. IIRC she stopped in Pearl Harbor for the 50th anniversary of the start of WWII in Dec 1991, and was part of the ceremonies for that, then sailed home and was retired.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
IIRC she stopped in Pearl Harbor for the 50th anniversary of the start of WWII in Dec 1991, and was part of the ceremonies for that, then sailed home and was retired.