It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
According to sources, the recent construction of a training centre for the Indian defence officers in Sosnovy Bor, west of St Petersburg, confirms Russia’s intentions to lease nuclear submarines to India.
“The international centre will start training 300 Indian Naval officers by mid-September,” officials said. This constitutes 4 Akula crews.
Originally posted by blue cell
Wow that is good, i'm glad our allie India is developing more capabilites. Maybe we should work with them on alternative sub propulsion ideas, so they can stop relying on Russia to much.
Originally posted by COWlan
2 Akula IIs. Russia only has at most 3 Akula IIs in service and I doubt they all go out for lease (come on, Russia's gotta keep one at least). Akula I/II are no match for even basic LA class SSNs as the FCS of Akulas sucked crap and they could only match the acoustic characteristics of LA class at slow speeds so they are even less of a match for improved LA class, Virginnia class and (why is this even here) Sea Wolf class. I'd like some "official" declaration too on this, a website with bollywood pop-up ads doesn't do it for me.
India is acquiring 2 more Kilos? Thats new, haven't heard of that.
Scorpenes sure are a lot more expensive than Kilos eh, they should be a lot better than the 877s that India has? 3 Bil for 6, Kilos are 1bil for 5 P636.
The active submarines of this class are in restricted service to conserve their remaining reactor core lives. There are at least eight Akula submarines currently operational, and by some estimates the number of Akulas in active service may be as great as eleven. At least three more units [and possibly as many as five] remain under construction, and their completion could bring the total inventory to as many as fifteen boats by 2010.
As of January 2003, Janes thought that 9 Akula were thought to be operational, and Periscope agreed as of August 2003.
First, only the "Improved Akula / Akula II and the new Severodvinsk SSNs have capabilities comparable with the U.S. Los Angeles and Seawolf attack submarines. All other Russian subs possess significantly weaker capabilities. (Source: Jane's Fighting Ships, 1996-1997)
The Project 971A Akula II incorporated an improved double layer silencing system for the power train.This variant had noise emissions that were roughly the level of a basic Los Angeles and that of the Improved Los Angeles at slow speeds
Even China, which possesses already order obsolete APL of the type "khan'" (NEP), their possibilities are considerably lower. However, the newest Chinese multipurpose submarine of project 093 only is located in the stage of field testing, and it will prove to be a good "underwater hunter", thus far to say difficultly. But here Russian "sharks" their "teeth" already clearly demonstrated. Today they are some of that most perfected in the world, practically without in any way being inferior to American APL of the type "Sea Wolf" (about "Los Angeles" and to speak it does not be worthwhile) and even to some promising nuclear-powered ships of the following generation.
Originally posted by Daedalus3
India already has 10 (acquiring 2 more this year) kilo class/Project 636 submarines
Originally posted by COWlan
2 Akula IIs. Russia only has at most 3 Akula IIs in service and I doubt they all go out for lease (come on, Russia's gotta keep one at least). Akula I/II are no match for even basic LA class SSNs as the FCS of Akulas sucked crap and they could only match the acoustic characteristics of LA class at slow speeds so they are even less of a match for improved LA class, Virginnia class and (why is this even here) Sea Wolf class. I'd like some "official" declaration too on this, a website with bollywood pop-up ads doesn't do it for me.
India is acquiring 2 more Kilos? Thats new, haven't heard of that.
Scorpenes sure are a lot more expensive than Kilos eh, they should be a lot better than the 877s that India has? 3 Bil for 6, Kilos are 1bil for 5 P636.
Originally posted by COWlan
2 Akula IIs. Russia only has at most 3 Akula IIs in service and I doubt they all go out for lease (come on, Russia's gotta keep one at least). Akula I/II are no match for even basic LA class SSNs as the FCS of Akulas sucked crap and they could only match the acoustic characteristics of LA class at slow speeds so they are even less of a match for improved LA class, Virginnia class and (why is this even here) Sea Wolf class. I'd like some "official" declaration too on this, a website with bollywood pop-up ads doesn't do it for me.
India is acquiring 2 more Kilos? Thats new, haven't heard of that.
Scorpenes sure are a lot more expensive than Kilos eh, they should be a lot better than the 877s that India has? 3 Bil for 6, Kilos are 1bil for 5 P636.
Potryasayushche small noise level was achieved to a considerable extent due to the fact that all basic equipment and the battle posts of the submarine of razmestipi on the shock absorbers in the zone blocks. The latter are three-dimensional frame structures with the decks. And strictly by multistage rubber-cord dashpots blocks are isolated from the housing PL. The super-possibilities of Russian "sharks" allowed our submariners repeatedly "to be sat down on the tail" to atomic underwater strategic rocket carriers of the type "Ohio" - the pride of American ship building. For example, APL "Tigris" (K -154) under the command of captain OF THE I rank Aleksey burilichev revealed this underwater "nuclear terminator" and long time secretly it followed it, moreover in the region of the world ocean, which the Yankee was considered reliably covered their antisubmarine forces and facilities. Our commander obtained the title the "hero of Russia", and to many American keptenam and to Admirals were reached "pronunciations with the recording". By the way, another submarine of this type, "wolf" (K -461), in 1995-1996 achieved distant antisubmarine cover of Russian carrier-based group headed by TAVKR the "Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union Kuznetsov".
Nonetheless, the American Improved Los Angeles class retained a decisive edge in silencing compared to the Akuka I. The Project 971A Akula II incorporated an improved double layer silencing system for the power train. According to Russian sources, this variant had noise emissions that were roughly the level of a basic Los Angeles and that of the Improved Los Angeles at slow speeds. At medium or high speeds the Improved Los Angeles design retains an acoustic advantage according to Russian sources. The Project 971 uses advanced sound insulation techniques that may not withstand Russian service conditions, and it may actually be noiser than earlier designs using more basic quieting technologies if poorly built or improperly maintained.
Akula I/II are no match for even basic LA class SSNs as the FCS of Akulas sucked crap and they could only match the acoustic characteristics of LA class at slow speeds so they are even less of a match for improved LA class, Virginnia class and (why is this even here) Sea Wolf class.
But here Russian "sharks" their "teeth" already clearly demonstrated. Today they are some of that most perfected in the world, practically without in any way being inferior to American APL of the type "Sea Wolf" (about "Los Angeles" and to speak it does not be worthwhile) and even to some promising nuclear-powered ships of the following generation.
Originally posted by Daedalus3
Yea I know what cowlan meant but it isn't necessarilty true, as Mr. beeblebrox(Zaphod58) and that russian exercept I quoted have pointed out..
Even Akula I has caused problems for the LA class subs according to recounts from zaphod's mates and such things are not posted on pro-american sites like globalsecurity..
Can't refute it when you hear from "the horse's mouth" can you?