New Study Shows Fully Vaccinated Will Lose 25 Years From Life Span

Na reply to: v1rtu0s0

I'm calling it as I see it total BS nobody knows 25 years why not 21 years and a half why not 18 years 9 months nobody knows I call it as it is total BS marketing a fear mongering.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

It's two(?) years. How could any study be believable that talks about consequences 25 years in the future?
Magic crystal ball?

It's more believable that New York City and Miami will be underwater by 2030 due to melting glaciers. The electric car chargers will need to be moved inland.

And the Corona is melting the glaciers? Or what does that have to do with anything?

originally posted by: musicismagic
Na reply to: v1rtu0s0

I'm calling it as I see it total BS nobody knows 25 years why not 21 years and a half why not 18 years 9 months nobody knows I call it as it is total BS marketing a fear mongering.

You forget what we are dealing with.

A novel vaccine that was fast tracked at warp speed to save us from a novel virus, that was killing all the people around the world.

It was a miracle. We have such short memories. Three years gone from our lives and we have already forgotten.

originally posted by: Xtrozero
So just saying...

You and others have said 1000 times that there is no long term data on the vaccine and so correctly suggested it should had never been mandated, true. But, now you are suggesting you have long term data that "someone who’s had 4 or 5 shots and is 30 years old today can now expect to live to 55 at the oldest."

Interesting...

Indicators don't always require long terms to predict. This is mostly a prediction, but it's an educated prediction, it's not purely speculation.

I get it though; you're coping.

#Unvaxxed, because duh.

a reply to: musicismagic

current evolution of treatments for the elderly from covid suggest those alive today will see 140 plus.. thats down to the medicals focusing on treatments to save the elderly during covid rather than the young, the average age of death remained in the early 80s and the reasons the usual ones for old people dying, heart disease, stroke, dementia, cancer etc..

the treatment focus was on what was killing the aged reflecting the age of the bigger donors rather than anything altruistic.. we see mrna used as the vehicle to deliver angina medication to rejuvenate diseased hearts we see specialised ops to break up brain clots, we see huge focus on dementia treatments and then the pivots of mrna to cancer treatments..

the question remains om the cost as the focus has been on the elderly not young.. for the young the focus is on body modifications.. as they inch towards their singularity..

a reply to: CriticalStinker

What about what happens when you fly all the time?

a reply to: Peeple

Kind of like "It's safe and effective, and prevents infection?" I mean, how on earth would they be able to determine the safety of this crap vaccine without 25 years of safety research? Kind of like how there is so much data suppression that you can't make heads or tails of the damn thing?

At this point, so many people in charge of the pandemic failed so miserably that I don't trust a word they say. And they lied, and withheld safety data, why would you trust the pharmaceutical companies in the first place? They have paid out billions in injury suits they have lost.

My husband almost lost his job for refusing the vaccine, that should have NEVER happened.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
One of the top insurance research analysts in the country has discovered that the fully vaccinated have significantly reduced their life spans. Josh Stirling made the discovery when analyzing life insurance and disability data from the past few years. Using this data as well as data from the CDC, he discovered the number of vaccinations directly correlates to a greater increase in mortality. He found the exact same trend in UK data (ONS), as well as German data. This also shows up when examining fertility data. Stirling has discovered the same patterns as Ed Dowd, the portfolio manager who previously used his skills in data analysis to yield huge profits for BlackRock. For both Dowd and Stirling, finding this pattern is like childs play compared to predicting trends in more complex economic systems.

Those who have been fully vaccinated for COVID-19 with mRNA shots will lose 25 years of their life expectancy, a bombshell new study has revealed.

Researchers analyzed government data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Cleveland Clinic Data, and insurance company risk assessment data.

The analysis uncovered a disturbing trend showing life spans plummeting in those who had multiple doses of the shots.

The latest Cleveland Clinic Data and the latest US data were analyzed by Josh Stirling, founder of Insurance Collaboration to Save Lives and former #1 ranked Insurance Analyst.

The damage to health caused by each vaccine dose does not lessen over time as it appears to continue indefinitely.

The study found that someone who’s had 4 or 5 shots and is 30 years old today can now expect to live to 55 at the oldest.

If you use the number of people who are vaccinated, the different proportions of the United States and the different categories, and you apply the experience from the United Kingdom to the United States, you end up concluding that we are probably having about 20 per cent additional mortality as a result of the vaccine, which if those numbers hung true, would be 600,000 deaths a year in the United States.

SOURCE

I remember reading here on ATS that people would be dropping from covid vaccines within 3 months then 6 months then a year etc etc .
Now a goofball news site says it’s within 25 years ? Lmao 😂.
The average age in America is 39 years old . So yes by age 64 many people do meet death from 1000s of medical issues. There are countless people here on ATS who ramble on about vaccine deaths as they smoke & drink alcohol at their computers while posting here in threads ?
35% of all Americans are 50 yrs old or older . With the average age of death in America is 77 years , so by default in 25 years with all ages from today there will be 45% of all Americans alive today will be dead or dying of accidents , health issues & crime .
Living is dangerous & covid vaccines saved lives .
No big pharma company wants to wipeout people they could bleed to death $$$ their whole lives .
If your business model was to get drugs into everyone from cradle to grave , why develop a vaccine that would kill 50% of people in 25 years ?

a reply to: SecrettoSociety

If your business model was to get drugs into everyone from cradle to grave , why develop a vaccine that would kill 50% of people in 25 years ?

Ooo! Ooo!I think I know! I think I know!

To reduce the number of people and families you have to pay off after you can no longer hide that you deliberately distributed a potentially deadly product that you lied about?

Did I get it right?

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: CriticalStinker

What about what happens when you fly all the time?

Soon you’ll be endlessly flying.

The evidence is all there.

It’s just weird that I don’t anecdotally know of an unexplained death myself.

originally posted by: NightSkyeB4Dawn

originally posted by: Asktheanimals
Rather terrifying when your wife is fully vaxxed and you're both in your 60's. Second line? Pray she got saline all 3 times.

I would be surprised to make it another 25 years anyway.

With the way this world is going, I pray that I don't.

I don't plan on making it to 90 or anything like that myself but don't like the thought of ending up a widower. When you've spent half your life with someone you grow together in subtle ways. At any rate maybe we'll go together as we're both a bit long in the tooth to be trying to rebuild everything after whatever is coming.

Sorry Virtuoso but this one is a no go. As someone who owned a life insurance company through the pandemic I can tell you with certainty that none of my agents were required to mark on a persons application whether or not they had gotten the covid shots (just a reminder, these aren’t vaccines, changing the definition of one to fit your ideology doesn’t change what it isn’t). The most they would be required to mark on an application in regards to covid or shots is if the person had been in the hospital recently

Now, let’s say they had medical records from the passed 5 years (some people don’t, we would send a nurse out to these people to give them a physical) then MAYBE, yes, having gotten a covid shot would be in their medical records. BUT that is if they got it from an ATTENDING PHYSICIAN!

People don’t realize the absolute F**kery that has happened here. Do you all not realize how many people just went to drive-up sites, Walmart’s, CVS’s, ect to get these shots? A whole lot. Want to know how many of those people DON’T see a doctor regularly? A whole lot. This is inevitably going to lead to problems for tracking data, which was of course done on purpose. This point I am making should be a thread in and of itself because like I said, people just don’t realize what happened here.

The only way this “analyst” could have possibly known for sure, is by having the covid shots as Cause of Death on their death certificate. Then when family or whoever is filing the death claim for that person would the analyst be able to tell that it was specifically cause by that after an autopsy, which most refuse to put on a death certificate. Only underwriters have access to medical records and that’s to determine approval then also during a “look-back period” on a policy which is usually about two years.

Point is, in such a short amount of time the analyst can’t say such things for sure. Just like you can’t inject something experimental into a persons body and expect it to be, or claim it to be “safe and effective” in such a short amount of time. If you got the shot(s) you took an idiotic, unnecessary risk to your health and overall life, when it was for a virus with a 99+% survival rate.
Statistically speaking.


a reply to: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: SRPrime


Indicators don't always require long terms to predict. This is mostly a prediction, but it's an educated prediction, it's not purely speculation.

I get it though; you're coping.

Say one thing and do another... What is it that I'm coping about. I'm healthy as hell at the age of 63. I'm in better shape mentally and physically then many who work with me 1/2 my age, so I'm good.

originally posted by: NightSkyeB4Dawn
a reply to: SecrettoSociety

If your business model was to get drugs into everyone from cradle to grave , why develop a vaccine that would kill 50% of people in 25 years ?

Ooo! Ooo!I think I know! I think I know!

To reduce the number of people and families you have to pay off after you can no longer hide that you deliberately distributed a potentially deadly product that you lied about?

Did I get it right?

Well , there plan was a horrible one , because within 25 years there can be millions of lawsuits brought against them .

a reply to: Xtrozero

Every day that goes by adds to the long term data. What's interesting to me is how the more they run up the numbers and crunch in more data points, the worse the end result gets.

originally posted by: Xtrozero
You and others have said 1000 times that there is no long term data on the vaccine and so correctly suggested it should had never been mandated, true. But, now you are suggesting you have long term data that "someone who’s had 4 or 5 shots and is 30 years old today can now expect to live to 55 at the oldest."

Statistics. Extrapolation.

Of course, the results are only as good as those engaging in the analysis, so I've no clue if either of these people have a bias one way or the other, but they do seem to have decent reputations, so...

Yeah, interesting...

a reply to: CriticalStinker

Not pro vaxxer... and until this post, I held myself back. For someone that lives with the consequences of said vaccination, I found that one post a bit tasteless to read. I understand where you were coming from though.

But I would not blame people if they misconstrue you as pro vaxxer after reading that one post. Because for someone that does not know you at all, it sure looks like the ramblings of a teenager during big break.

No offense to you though and none taken.

a reply to: SecrettoSociety

You need a coherent non chaotic society subject to the rule of law to field lawsuits. I wonder if that will be the case when that time comes due.