It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: servovenford
Chilling.
Man's desire for control will be his ultimate undoing.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: karl 12
Elon Musk is a strange individual. I don't think he was necessarily set up for this..
originally posted by: wdkirk
There is not cost we won’t pay to develop this.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
It's not everyday one sees a half-savior, half-demon.
TheRedneck
Derrick Broze of The Conscious Resistance hosts journalists/researchers Whitney Webb, James Corbett, Jason Bermas, and Ryan Cristián to discuss why the public should be extremely skeptical of Elon Musk.
Video
The FDA’s key concerns include questions about how Neuralink’s technology can be implanted or removed without damaging the brain as well as issues with the use of lithium batteries—which are a known fire hazard
No, Elon Musk can’t put chips into people’s brains: Regulators rejected Neuralink’s device due to safety risks, report says
Neuralink approved by FDA for brain implant trial on humans
In March, employees from Neuralink told Reuters that its application for human trials was rejected by the FDA due to myriad safety concerns, including the use of lithium batteries in the brain. Neuralink employees shared that the FDA rejection also questioned how the device would be extracted from the patient “without damaging brain tissue.”
Animal testing trails at Neuralink have also come under scrutiny for conflicts of interest after 19 members of the company’s 22-person animal research oversight board were employees of Neuralink.