Klaus Schwab's Father Was A Nazi And Close Confidant Of Hitler

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
He's the man who we all trust to reset the world and lead us into the 4th industrial revolution, including encouraging the use of safe and effective vaccines, and enforcing things like digital ID's, as well ensuring you will own nothing, but will be happy. He fights for good, seeking to censor disinformation, and ensure all corporations conform to ESG policies. He has our best interests at heart, and we should be grateful to have such a strong leader crafting global policies.

Or does he?

Is the real Klaus Schwab a kindly old uncle figure wishing to do good for humanity, or is he really the son of a Nazi collaborator who used slave labour and aided Nazi efforts to obtain the first atomic bomb?

The answer to this question literally determines the future of humanity. That's because, this man has an incredible amount of power and if he is secretly up to no good, then there's a pretty big chance he's on board with depopulation. Although, from his perspective, It's not really a bad thing if you think about it. Klaus probably sees it as "tough love", were we need to cull a large number of humans to save the rest of the humans as well as the planet itself. If you could just go ahead and... die... that would be great... mmkay?

It turns out that the bond villain wannabe isn't a wannabe. The nut doesn't fall far from the tree, it just gets smarter and even more well connected. Klaus Schwab's father was a close confidant of Hitler and ran a factory with forced laborer's including POW's. This factory idea may have given Klaus the idea for the future when all the people who own nothing are working for free, but of course, they are "happy."

Back in the Escher-Wyss factory in Ravensburg, Eugen Schwab had been busy putting forced labourers to work at his model Nazi company. During the years of World War II, nearly 3,600 forced labourers worked in Ravensburg, including at Escher Wyss. According to the city archivist in Ravensburg✎ EditSign, Andrea Schmuder, the Escher-Wyss machine factory in Ravensburg employed between 198 and 203 civil workers and POWs during the war. Karl Schweizer, a local Lindau historian, states that Escher-Wyss maintained a small special camp for forced labourers on the factory premises.

Incredibly, somehow Klaus was able to position himself with front row seats to the world trade center attacks, having witnessed the attack from a comfortable distance away in 2001. This is quite the coincidence considering Klaus didn't live in the United States at the time.

On the morning of 11 September 2001, Klaus Schwab sat having breakfast in the Park East Synagogue in New York City with Rabbi Arthur Schneier, former Vice President for the World Jewish Congress and close associate of the Bronfman and Lauder families. Together, the two men watched one of the most impactful events of the next twenty years unfold as planes struck the World Trade Center buildings.

Klaus also admits one of his biggest influences was one of his college professors, Henry Kisinger, the most notorious living war criminal, responsible for countless deaths, including US service members.

All in all, Klaus isn't such a bad guy. He wrote a pretty cool book you can buy on amazon, called Covid-19, The Great Reset, which he somehow wrote and published in less than 3 months after the pandemic began. It's a good read, but in general it sort of explains how you will own nothing, although its hard to see how that will happen without a lot of war, and a tyrannical one world government.

But, so what? The game is on, and the mRNA vaccines are 100% safe and effective.


SOURCE

RECENT TWITTER ACTIVITY

And , George Soros was a Nazi Collaborator who sent his Fellow Jews to the Death Camps . Does anyone see a Pattern Here Among these 4th Reich Maniacs ?

This is not a picture of George Soros.

Soros would have been younger than 14 at the end of the war and the minimum age for the SS was 17, so he could not possibly have been in the SS.

The picture is of the Nazi war criminal Oskar Groenig, who has no relation to George Soros.

The meme is another online lie, and is as factual as the OP that tries to suggest that Klaus Schwab's father was a Nazi.

Also, Soros has held no political office or government position, centers his investments outside of the US (where the SEC can't touch him), and, therefore, has not directed any policy under the Clintons or any other US politicians.

Soros has made financial contributions to the political parties he supports, though, and in 2004, Soros loaned Trump an 'apolitical' $160 million to build the Trump International Hotel and tower in Chicago.

originally posted by: daskakik

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
Klaus is a Closet Neo Nazi who is Rich as Fook and Does Not Care what the Peasants Think .

Is he though? What proof do you have?

Also, even if he were, he isn't up for president of the world so the fear mongering in the OP is uncalled for.

He doesn’t have to be up for president of the world , he’s in charge of all of his past recruits and students . He just needs that , he just has people like Trudeau do his bidding for him . He doesn’t need to be president of the world to own and control our puppet leaders . You have been here a very long time I would except you to know this already !

a reply to: chr0naut

What are you talking about? More people died in 2021 than they did in 2020, despite vaccinations and despite the early peak due to the virus ravaging care homes.

Also, more cases and hospitalisations, despite a reduction in tests.

Spin the figures round and round till you're dizzy, they still don't backup your claims.

a reply to: Dontlietome
I have been here for some time which is why I'm jaded to these types of threads.

Your post sounds like a good point but is he really in control of them or do they just agree with him on some ideas?

You see, when someone is painted as a power hungry individual, maybe that once removed sense of power wouldn't be enough. Then again maybe he has no real power and is happy.

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: chr0naut

What are you talking about? More people died in 2021 than they did in 2020, despite vaccinations and despite the early peak due to the virus ravaging care homes.

The peak in COVID-19 deaths in the US was in the week of 18 January 2021, before the vaccines. After the vaccines, there were fewer deaths, despite there ending up being about 5 times the number of those that were infected at the start of the year.

Also, more cases and hospitalisations, despite a reduction in tests.

How could you even know about the numbers of tests? Please publish your sources.

Spin the figures round and round till you're dizzy, they still don't backup your claims.

Are you sure about that:

COVID-19 Dashboard by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University (JHU)

Also, for balance, please supply a link to where you get your data.

And still only 31% of the US have had their third shot. That's not enough, especially to blame the growth in infections on perceived deficits in the vaccines.

a reply to: chr0naut

Considering the proliferation and mild nature of omicron, and the fact that natural immunity is better than 15 doses of any vaccine, I believe your statement to be false. The ONLY good thing vaccination campaigns have done is provide a feeling of hope for some during all of the terror that was drummed up surrounding the bad flu that was going around. They should have only been used for the most at risk, and known measures to prime immune systems should have been broadcasted. Unfortunately that doesn't make anyone any money.

Covid was an excuse for the powerful, such as Mr. Soros, to push the NWO (i.e. WEF, William Entrance Foundation, etc) goals forward. They admit it -

COVID-19 pandemic and new variants of the virus have highlighted the urgency of the implementation of the 2030 Agenda (Coccia, 2021).

NIH

Considering this last point your post was not too off topic but, still, lets get back on track now.

a reply to: chr0naut

In England there's more deaths, more cases and more hospitalisations AFTER vaccinations began. Not even close or up for debate:

Covid Case Numbers

Covid Deaths:

Covid Deaths

Testing data you requested here:

Testing data

I have to assume the UK government is a reliable enough source for you.

If boosters are so important why do we no longer here anything about Covid or the pandemic? Shouldn't you be in the Ukraine threads telling us how evil Russia is now that the MSM have forgotten about the big bad disease that was going to kill everyone?

a reply to: Grenade
What you posted confirms what chr0naut posted, even for the UK, more cases but less deaths.:

After the vaccines, there were fewer deaths, despite there ending up being about 5 times the number of those that were infected at the start of the year.

To be fair, what you are saying is also correct, the total number of deaths after the introduction of the vaccines is higher but that would be a comparison of 10 month period with restrictions in place to 18 months with less restrictions.

a reply to: daskakik

So you admit the data doesn't match your narrative, now need to invoke lockdowns and masks. How very convenient.

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: daskakik

So you admit the data doesn't match your narrative, now need to invoke lockdowns and masks. How very convenient.

He changes his argument on the fly when someone catches him in a lie, then denies history anytime anyone presents anything. It's really a waste of time.

originally posted by: Grenade
So you admit the data doesn't match your narrative, now need to invoke lockdowns and masks. How very convenient.

It isn't my narrative.

I mentioned two of many variables that keep people like us, since we don't have all the data, from coming to a better conclusion.

I believe that a whole lot of people were given shots they never needed because it was a money grab. Also, a bunch of people did actually die from the disease and I'm thinking some were saved by the vaccines.

I also believe that anyone who died from the jab would have died from the virus since the thing shown to be the problem is the spike protein that exists in both.

Still, what chr0naut posted was true, more infections and less deaths after the vax roll-out.

a reply to: daskakik

What you believe has no bearing on the truth.

originally posted by: Grenade
What you believe has no bearing on the truth.

What you believe doesn't either but the fact remains that the stats you posted match what was said earlier, more cases but less deaths in regards to the number of cases.

originally posted by: andr3w68
a reply to: chr0naut

Considering the proliferation and mild nature of omicron

It is still killing people, at the current rate of 2,557 per week in the US.

, and the fact that natural immunity is better

People are catching COVID-19 multiple times, and some of them are dying from it. Immunity, natural or otherwise, is clearly not working to the extent you imply.

Immunizations promote natural immunity - that is how they work. Immunizations are a way to get the immune response, from your natural immune system, without getting the disease. The immunizations aren't antiseptics that kill the disease, nor are they therapeutics that help you recover. They only turn your immune system on to fight the disease.

than 15 doses of any vaccine

No-where in the world is there any official suggestion to use more than 4 doses of a COVID-19 vaccine. It may happen in the future that additional boosters are recommended, but the idea that we will be taking regular doses is entirely from anti-vaxxer exaggeration.

, I believe your statement to be false. The ONLY good thing vaccination campaigns have done is provide a feeling of hope for some during all of the terror that was drummed up surrounding the bad flu that was going around.

COVID-19 is caused by a coronavirus, not a 'flu virus. But influenza can also be really deadly. The influenza that swept the world between 1918 and 1920 is estimated to have killed 50 million people in those two years. Interestingly, the US case-fatality ratio of COVID-19, and the US case fatality ratio of the 1918 'Spanish' flu (which actually originated in Kansas) is about the same. The primary differences between the total deaths for both diseases is most likely due to the international efforts to reduce the spread of COVID-19.

They should have only been used for the most at risk, and known measures to prime immune systems should have been broadcasted.

Immunizations prime immune systems. Supplements, less so.

Unfortunately that doesn't make anyone any money.

Yes, it does make money for the big-supplements industry, and they are a big industry. They already make 33.5 billion per year in the USA alone. Consider what they could have made is only the FDA and other similar international regulatory bodies hadn't prevented them from advertising all sorts of placebo 'cures'.

Covid was an excuse for the powerful, such as Mr. Soros, to push the NWO (i.e. WEF, William Entrance Foundation,

The what-the-what, now?

WEF stands for World Economic Forum. I did an internet search for the "William Entrance Foundation" and couldn't find any valid response.

etc) goals forward. They admit it -

COVID-19 pandemic and new variants of the virus have highlighted the urgency of the implementation of the 2030 Agenda (Coccia, 2021).

NIH

These are two Chinese academics submitting a paper. I doubt that they have any association with Soros, or of the World Economic Forum (William Entrance Foundation??) or any new world order group.

Considering this last point your post was not too off topic but, still, lets get back on track now.

Also, if the virus is so benign as you started out suggesting, then how is it killing so many people in so many countries around the world?

And, despite that, where is the evidence now of major cause of upheaval that disrupts current political situations and collapses economies?

I mean, here we are, three years in, and there has been no significant political change, anywhere much. The same stupid groups, are doing the same stupid things, in the same stupid ways. Even as a conspiracy, it seems to have fizzled out.

a reply to: daskakik

Could less cases be attributed to less tests?

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: chr0naut

In England there's more deaths, more cases and more hospitalisations AFTER vaccinations began. Not even close or up for debate:

Covid Case Numbers

Covid Deaths:

Covid Deaths

Testing data you requested here:

Testing data

I have to assume the UK government is a reliable enough source for you.

Yes the UK and US official numbers are the best we have. But this does not tell how many tests were done, it tells of how many were reported. Now that the immunizations are readily available, the government is relying upon them and increasing levels of immunity in the populace, rather than testing and extended isolation after a positive.

If boosters are so important why do we no longer here anything about Covid or the pandemic?

Every newspaper and news site still carries some sort of COVID dashboard. Perhaps you are just not seeing them?

Shouldn't you be in the Ukraine threads telling us how evil Russia is now that the MSM have forgotten about the big bad disease that was going to kill everyone?

COVID-19 was never going to kill everyone. But it is still killing some.

There have been more deaths in total because the deaths are a fraction of the numbers of people infected. Among those who are infected, death numbers have fallen by ratio since vaccination began.

In the UK, only 59% of the population have had their third dose. Still nowhere near 90%.

How can anyone maintain that the virus is quite benign, and then claim increasing deaths due to it, and then deny that there are still people dying from it, too, pretty much in the same post?

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: daskakik

Could less cases be attributed to less tests?

I think tests now are probably done more when people begin showing possible symptoms, rather than at random.

I think a lot of tests were initially done without any sort of disease present and now testing is done more relative to actual cases.

originally posted by: Grenade
Could less cases be attributed to less tests?

Certainly, but what was said, and what you posted, were more cases, not less.

a reply to: daskakik

There are more cases since vaccinations began, despite a reduction in testing, do the math.

Operative word in my response was COULD.

originally posted by: Grenade
There are more cases since vaccinations began, despite a reduction in testing, do the math.

How many times do I have to say that that is what was said by chr0naut?

...more cases, not less.

ETA: For good measure:

After the vaccines, there were fewer deaths, despite there ending up being about 5 times the number of those that were infected at the start of the year.