It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: peaceinoutz
a reply to: PatriotGames4u
The aggressor FREQUENTLY ends up surrendering
I'm referring to a particular battle not the entire war over many years as WWII was. The battle here is particularly the Russian assault on Ukraine. Sure, if this war went on for years and Russia lost that's another story. As they withdrew from Afghanistan, in the 90s, and as the US withdrew from Afghanistan recently, and in Vietnam in 75. But as of now, that doesn't apply since Russia as far as we know is not necessarily losing this war. I wish they were, and maybe they are but that's not apparent at his point.
originally posted by: peaceinoutz
a reply to: PatriotGames4u
My point is about surrendering. You mentioned Russia surrendering.
Sure, in individual battles one side loses but that doesn’t always mean they lose the war and surrender. The Union lost many battles. Sometimes in battles, one side surrenders and they take prisoners, sure, but surrendering is a relative term as apples to this war.
Surrender in a war like this will be Russia like the US did in Afghanistan just leaving.
no big thing, just semantics