All 3 defendants found guilty of murdering Ahmaud Arbery

a reply to: frogs453

I absolutely agree with their findings and ultimate decision.

Know what i dislike though? The framing by some media.

For instance this:

Three white US men convicted of hate crimes in Black jogger murder

Why is it necessary to title it as "Three white US men" ? How about just Three men....other than to keep the flames of racism going strong?

a reply to: alphabetaone


I don't disagree with you. News and sensationalism I suppose.

originally posted by: frogs453
All three men were unanimously found guilty of hate crimes this morning.

What a total shocker considering the texts and conversations they had.

a reply to: alphabetaone

There is no other reason.

originally posted by: alphabetaone
a reply to: frogs453

I absolutely agree with their findings and ultimate decision.

Know what i dislike though? The framing by some media.

For instance this:

Three white US men convicted of hate crimes in Black jogger murder

Why is it necessary to title it as "Three white US men" ? How about just Three men....other than to keep the flames of racism going strong?

Yup, need to keep stoking the flames, thats it!

Not a big fan of "hate crime" prosecution.

They've already been convicted of murder--quite obviously they didn't like the man they killed.

Not sure what convicting them of "hate crimes" adds to what is already there??

a reply to: seagull

Honestly, im not either, especially now with pronouns ad infinitum, i mean it can literally be a "hate" crime to laugh at someone identifying as an oyster.

It makes it kinda dangerous.

a reply to: seagull
It's a message to those whose brains are in the 1920s who would kill and bet on a Klan jury.

originally posted by: alphabetaone
a reply to: seagull

Honestly, im not either, especially now with pronouns ad infinitum, i mean it can literally be a "hate" crime to laugh at someone identifying as an oyster.

It makes it kinda dangerous.

What would you call a white person killing white Jewish people?

www.israelhayom.com...

originally posted by: putnam6
Not gonna lie us Georgians were more than a little concerned, still are but it seems like a fair and just verdict, just as the Rittenhouse verdict was.

Now it all depends on if certain elements are going to riot, loot, and burn-in jubilation like they do when they are angry at a verdict.

chicago.suntimes.com...

BRUNSWICK, Ga. — All three white men charged in the death of Ahmaud Arbery were convicted of murder Wednesday in the fatal shooting that became part of a larger national reckoning on racial injustice.

The convictions for Greg McMichael, son Travis McMichael and neighbor William “Roddie” Bryan came after jurors deliberated for about 10 hours. The men face minimum sentences of life in prison. It is up to the judge to decide whether that comes with or without the possibility of parole.

www.cnn.com...

A jury delivered guilty verdicts Wednesday on murder charges against three White men who chased and shot Ahmaud Arbery as the 25-year-old Black man jogged last year through their Glynn County, Georgia, neighborhood.

A jury found Travis and Gregory McMichael guilty of murder Wednesday on charges they chased and killed Ahmaud Arbery, a 25-year-old Black man, as he jogged last year through their neighborhood in Glynn County, Georgia.

.

edit on Wed Nov 24 2021 by DontTreadOnMe because: IMPORTANT: Using Content From Other Websites on ATS

sorry, i don't know all the evidence presented in court.

so given the racial climate at the time i'd say the conviction is iffy.

originally posted by: alphabetaone
a reply to: frogs453

I absolutely agree with their findings and ultimate decision.

Know what i dislike though? The framing by some media.

For instance this:

Three white US men convicted of hate crimes in Black jogger murder

Why is it necessary to title it as "Three white US men" ? How about just Three men....other than to keep the flames of racism going strong?

yeah like the white latino jew that killed a black kid eating skittles.

a reply to: olaru12

Depending upon circumstance?

A murderer.

What would you call him or her??

a reply to: TheBoomersRBusted

What message is that??

A KKK jury, eh? In the 1920's the feds were chock full of Kluckers, too.

To my mind, this comes somewhat closer to double jeopardy than I'm comfortable with. Disagree at your leisure.

originally posted by: olaru12

What would you call a white person killing white Jewish people?

I would call it, one person killing another person. I fail to see the benefit of continually playing race cards for the sake of a perpetual ember for racism.

Media does this all the time.

Justice isn't enough

Race hustlers ahoy!