It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

BMJ publishes paper on the effectiveness social distancing and mask wearing, etc

page: 2
3
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 18 2021 @ 05:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: Randyvine2
a reply to: AaarghZombies

You have no credibility and neither do these assholes.


Source, please.



You mean fact checkers that blatantly lie like Politifact and the Rittenhouse case?

When lies are used to censor truth
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Or the narrative vaccines are providing a constant level of effectiveness in studies, but Fauci comes out and states everyone needs boosters because of waning effectiveness against hospitalizations and deaths?
edit on 18-11-2021 by neutronflux because: Added and fixed



posted on Nov, 18 2021 @ 05:57 AM
link   
a reply to: AaarghZombies
What masks do you recommend?

Where I worked I had to use the surgical masks provided.




edit on 18-11-2021 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 18 2021 @ 05:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: neutronflux

Maybe that's why Covid is still a thing.

People wearing substandard masks doesn't prove that masks are a crock, it proves that cheap masks are a crock.


Then is that shown in the studies you cited? Or they just cooked studies to justify political policy.



posted on Nov, 18 2021 @ 05:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: AaarghZombies

Are we still in a pandemic…….

That should answer your question on effectiveness.



Masks are like condoms. They only protect you if you use them.


What condemns have holes in them larger than sperm?



posted on Nov, 18 2021 @ 06:03 AM
link   
a reply to: iwanttobelieve70

This is what you do if you have a hole in your head.

you tube
edit on 18-11-2021 by Randyvine2 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 18 2021 @ 06:08 AM
link   
a reply to: AaarghZombies

Sigh.

I was in the military. We trained for biological/chemical/nuclear attack

In industry, I worked is H2S areas. And arsenic areas.

I was taught if a masked doesn’t seal against your face, it doesn’t do crap.

Then you have to have a disposable chain to safely and effectively dispose of used PPE.

I have never worn a procedural masked (cheap surgical mask) that has sealed against my face. Masks that allows slip by at wear it comes in contact against the skin. Masks not made to be worn during things like loading lumber or groceries. Masks not made to trap snot and sweat in a matrix. Masks not designed to be worn more than 45 minutes.

Why are people not supposed to wear an N-95 mask with an exit valve. Because it’s supposedly not effective against the spread against covid. If a cheap mask has slip by, it’s no different.

If masks were effective. Why was there a push to double mask…..


(post by Randyvine2 removed for a manners violation)

posted on Nov, 18 2021 @ 06:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Randyvine2
a reply to: AaarghZombies

You have no credibility and neither do these assholes.


I think these people



Stella Talic, lecturer in clinical epidemiology and public health12, Shivangi Shah, honours student1, Holly Wild, lecturer and honours student13, Danijela Gasevic, senior lecturer in epidemiology and chronic disease prevention14, Ashika Maharaj, lecturer quality and safety and cancer epidemiology1, Zanfina Ademi, associate professor of medical outcomes and health economics12, Xue Li, assistant professor46, Wei Xu, research student4, Ines Mesa-Eguiagaray, statistical geneticist4, Jasmin Rostron, research student4, Evropi Theodoratou, professor of cancer epidemiology and global health45, Xiaomeng Zhang, research student4, Ashmika Motee, research student4, Danny Liew, professor of medical outcomes and health economics12, Dragan Ilic, professor of medical education and public health1


Have more credibility than an anonymous poster on a conspiracy site whose counter point is just to call them 'Assholes'.

Ha ha ha,it sounds like half of China contributed to this study.
Remember Wuhan, that's all I'm saying.
Fool me once,shame on you.
Fool me twice,shame on me.



posted on Nov, 18 2021 @ 06:17 AM
link   
a reply to: AaarghZombies

Do that, if it makes you feel better.

"A random person on the Internet, German also, changed the text "Arbeit macht frei" to "Impfen macht frei".

And in China, a sack of rice just fell over.



posted on Nov, 18 2021 @ 06:18 AM
link   
a reply to: ScepticScot




Have more credibility than an anonymous poster on a conspiracy site whose counter point is just to call them 'Assholes'.


Yes and what you think will sadly never receive any consideration when
I describe what I see.



posted on Nov, 18 2021 @ 06:18 AM
link   
China is the biggest seller of masks and made trillions off that since January 2020. Not surprised if China bribes scientists in these kinds of studies. Real world data shows Republican states have far fewer cases than Democrat states due to not wearing mask as opposed to wearing mask.

Source:

covid.cdc.gov...-home
edit on 18-11-2021 by ResistanceFighter because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 18 2021 @ 06:19 AM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

It's a Meta-Study, so you'll need to read the source documents for answers.

You might find some of the answers that you are looking for Here



posted on Nov, 18 2021 @ 06:20 AM
link   

originally posted by: ResistanceFighter
China is the biggest seller of masks and made trillions off that since January 2020. Not surprised if China bribes scientists in these kinds of studies. Real world data shows Republican states have far fewer cases than Democrat states due to not wearing mask as opposed to wearing mask.

Source:

covid.cdc.gov...-home


Do you have any evidence that scientists have been bribed?

Accepting bribes is a very good way to destroy your reputation.



posted on Nov, 18 2021 @ 06:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: Randyvine2
a reply to: ScepticScot




Have more credibility than an anonymous poster on a conspiracy site whose counter point is just to call them 'Assholes'.


Yes and what you think will sadly never receive any consideration when
I describe what I see.


It's a peer reviewed meta-study of peer reviewed studies, if this isn't credible I don't know what is.



posted on Nov, 18 2021 @ 06:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: neutronflux

It's a Meta-Study, so you'll need to read the source documents for answers.

You might find some of the answers that you are looking for Here



If I bother to wear a mask in a biological hot spot like a pandemic, it’s going to be a mask that actual works. Full face that seals with proper filters.

Anything less is false hope based on a sick joke.



posted on Nov, 18 2021 @ 06:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: ResistanceFighter
China is the biggest seller of masks and made trillions off that since January 2020. Not surprised if China bribes scientists in these kinds of studies. Real world data shows Republican states have far fewer cases than Democrat states due to not wearing mask as opposed to wearing mask.

Source:

covid.cdc.gov...-home


Do you have any evidence that scientists have been bribed?

Accepting bribes is a very good way to destroy your reputation.
Just read their names,mostly Chinese-which in China means "you will do what you are told or you and your extended family will never be seen again."
Half of them are 'research students',sounds credible.
Aren't we all 'research students'?



posted on Nov, 18 2021 @ 06:23 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Nov, 18 2021 @ 06:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: AaarghZombies

Sigh.

I was in the military. We trained for biological/chemical/nuclear attack

In industry, I worked is H2S areas. And arsenic areas.

I was taught if a masked doesn’t seal against your face, it doesn’t do crap.

Then you have to have a disposable chain to safely and effectively dispose of used PPE.

I have never worn a procedural masked (cheap surgical mask) that has sealed against my face. Masks that allows slip by at wear it comes in contact against the skin. Masks not made to be worn during things like loading lumber or groceries. Masks not made to trap snot and sweat in a matrix. Masks not designed to be worn more than 45 minutes.

Why are people not supposed to wear an N-95 mask with an exit valve. Because it’s supposedly not effective against the spread against covid. If a cheap mask has slip by, it’s no different.

If masks were effective. Why was there a push to double mask…..


Different use-case.

You were wearing a mask to protect you from being contaminated.

These cheap non-sealing cloth masks are designed to prevent you from contaminating other people. The capture moisture droplets as you exhale, and what they don't capture the slow down so they do not carry so far.

It's why your dentist wears one. He's not worried about you contaminating him, he's worried about contaminating you.

I wear a mask with a hermetic seal and a renewable filter to protect myself from other people.



posted on Nov, 18 2021 @ 06:30 AM
link   

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: AaarghZombies
What masks do you recommend?

Where I worked I had to use the surgical masks provided.





A yard stick with a sharp end.



posted on Nov, 18 2021 @ 06:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: Randyvine2
a reply to: ScepticScot




Have more credibility than an anonymous poster on a conspiracy site whose counter point is just to call them 'Assholes'.


Yes and what you think will sadly never receive any consideration when
I describe what I see.


The paper is about the effectivness of various measures to reduce the spread of Covid. That isn't something you can see.




top topics



 
3
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join