It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: LoneCloudHopper2
This will go no-where because the FBI is leading the 'investigation'. The FBI is probably the most corrupt of all the alphabet agencies, they orchestrated the Jan 6th 'insurrection' with the assistance of the Pelosi cult and are known entrapment experts. They are the very definition of 'problem-reaction-solution' and are clearly batting for the Biden regime' and the globalists.
Will revisit this thread in a month or so to see if Hunter or Joe are in jail having faced treason, money laundering, child sex crimes and other charges they are both clearly guilty of. If not, then my assertion is further verified and therefore vindicated beyond what everybody already knows about those 2 and their rotten scum bloodline.
originally posted by: MDDoxs
a reply to: LoneCloudHopper2
Using there own money, for their own things, their own debaucheries, their own vices..Meh, I dont really care.
Believe or not, Biden and Hunter are two separate people, with their own lives and individual decisions. Nothing will come of this.
Sleepy Joe will not even notice this.
originally posted by: MDDoxs
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk
Consequently, ...'the sins of the son are directly related to the father, facilitated by the father and condoned by the father; a father who is complicit with the graft of, and fraud against, the american taxpayer!
This is just your opinion unless you can show me some evidence of this.
Though, I agree the sale of the art is ethically questionable, I dont see this a the government directly putting money into the Biden's pocket. Even if they were, this would be a small sum compared to past presidents.
Except when they are paying each other’s bills and taking care of each other’s stuff.
originally posted by: MDDoxs
a reply to: network dude
I am not going to defend the Biden's here.
I will highlight that sins of the son are not necessarily those of the father. And, what an individual does with their money is their business. These principals are why I think this article is just silly.
originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
Except when they are paying each other’s bills and taking care of each other’s stuff.
originally posted by: MDDoxs
a reply to: network dude
I am not going to defend the Biden's here.
I will highlight that sins of the son are not necessarily those of the father. And, what an individual does with their money is their business. These principals are why I think this article is just silly.
I see you looking the other way.
originally posted by: MDDoxs
originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
Except when they are paying each other’s bills and taking care of each other’s stuff.
originally posted by: MDDoxs
a reply to: network dude
I am not going to defend the Biden's here.
I will highlight that sins of the son are not necessarily those of the father. And, what an individual does with their money is their business. These principals are why I think this article is just silly.
I see you looking the other way.
So, the president should completely separate his finances while in office correct?
originally posted by: MDDoxs
originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
Except when they are paying each other’s bills and taking care of each other’s stuff.
originally posted by: MDDoxs
a reply to: network dude
I am not going to defend the Biden's here.
I will highlight that sins of the son are not necessarily those of the father. And, what an individual does with their money is their business. These principals are why I think this article is just silly.
I see you looking the other way.
So, the president should completely separate his finances while in office correct?