It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

What part of the Neuremberg code dont they understand?

page: 4
32
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 9 2021 @ 04:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: kimish
a reply to: ATruGod

Correct, the "Comirnaty" is the one that approved by the FDA. At the time it was approved, wasn't readily available as I understand it. So, folks getting their Pfizer vaccine were not getting the approved version unbeknownst to them.

If you're forced to take the jab, make sure to ask to see the box the vaccine came in so you know you're getting the FDA approved vaccine, Comirnaty.



Reports say won't be available until 2022 but all wording makes it look like thats what You are getting.



posted on Oct, 9 2021 @ 04:51 PM
link   
a reply to: ATruGod

So a mistake has been made, and all the shots are not the approved variety anyway,Did they think it would not be noticed? another reason why they are legally up the creek. The product has been misrepresented.



posted on Oct, 9 2021 @ 07:23 PM
link   
a reply to: ATruGod

Yep it is switcheroo.A good one but at least its hitting the senate .www.bitchute.com...



posted on Oct, 9 2021 @ 07:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: ATruGod

originally posted by: SirHardHarry
a reply to: anonentity


The whole idea of taking an experimental vaccine


Pfizer is FDA approved, therefore not experimental.


BUT NOT AVAILABLE!!


Very available. That's why, you know, people are getting it. Because it's available and approved.



posted on Oct, 9 2021 @ 08:08 PM
link   
a reply to: SirHardHarry

Look mate the vaccine being used is not the approved one there is a difference.www.bitchute.com...



posted on Oct, 9 2021 @ 08:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: SirHardHarry

Look mate the vaccine being used is not the approved one there is a difference.www.bitchute.com...



Because bitchute said?

Or do you have actual data to back up your claim?



posted on Oct, 9 2021 @ 08:25 PM
link   
a reply to: anonentity
They basically said that they will not be releasing their vax in the new packaging until they exhaust the available supply in the old packaging.

It is still the same product inside.



posted on Oct, 10 2021 @ 02:35 PM
link   
a reply to: daskakik
Mandating companies to fire people if they don't get vaccinated to me falls under "any other form of coercion"



posted on Oct, 10 2021 @ 07:12 PM
link   
None of which have been approved.


Either way, this is an argument based on semantics. Approved/not approved, won’t change the fact they are indeed experimental.



posted on Oct, 11 2021 @ 09:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: SirHardHarry

originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: SirHardHarry

Look mate the vaccine being used is not the approved one there is a difference.www.bitchute.com...



Because bitchute said?

Or do you have actual data to back up your claim?


They announced when it was "authorized" it wouldn't be available until 2023-24, they aren't going to advertise they are still giving the experimental, Emergency use, liability shielded "vaccine".



posted on Oct, 11 2021 @ 05:40 PM
link   
a reply to: ATruGod

This girl phones up Phizer and askes directly if it has been approved, we get an interesting answer. Which by any definition is NO it has not been approved. The MSM has approved it but that's all.www.bitchute.com...



posted on Oct, 11 2021 @ 06:08 PM
link   
a reply to: anonentity
This is bordering on retarded. Pfizer developed a vax, it got EUA, they then submitted it, with a name change, for full approval and that was granted.

It is the same vax whether it is in the old or the new package.



posted on Oct, 11 2021 @ 06:10 PM
link   
a reply to: daskakik

It is admitted it is not the same, but they say the difference does not affect its safety. Take that as you want to.



posted on Oct, 11 2021 @ 06:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: anonentity
It is admitted it is not the same, but they say the difference does not affect its safety. Take that as you want to.

That isn't what the vid you posted on the 9th said.

It said the packaging and insert had changed, not the vax.

ETA: And the first thing the operator in the new vid says is "I don't know if we have that information".
edit on 11-10-2021 by daskakik because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 12 2021 @ 12:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: ADAMandEVIL
Nurmeberg Code
The Nuremberg Code came out of a trial in post-war Germany in December of 1946, the second of the Nuremberg trials.
It doesn't cover vaccines, it was intended for non-consentual experimentationFactcheck.org
Neither the Nuremberg Code nor the Declaration of Helsinki is legally binding or legally enforceable in its own right.

No, Covid Vaccine Mandates Don’t Violate the Nuremberg Code Bloomberg


It does however cover medical experimentation on innocent civilians and I do believe that it covers genocide...

Both of which this set of vaccines can be claimed, is aimed at achieving (either through design or gross incompetence).

When the dust does finally settle from all of this.. I am almost positive that there will be trials and firing squads involved.

I am certain that no matter how powerful these elitists think they are or how successful they think they are going to be at getting total control over the lives of every human being.

Evil simply never wins the long game.

Never..!!
edit on 12-10-2021 by Ironclad1964 because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
32
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join