What part of the Neuremberg code dont they understand?

a reply to: daskakik

One conflict between legal and lawful is number 9 of the 10 commandments, You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.

While Non Disclose Agreements have become standard practice in the legal world, this forced silence is not lawful. To remain silent when you could help your neighbor goes against the foundations of the legal system we have today.

Legal is not equal to lawful. For a start they are spelt differently.

originally posted by: kwakakev
One conflict between legal and lawful is number 9 of the 10 commandments, You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.

Lying about what a vax might contain or it being detrimental is not bearing false witness against your neighbor.

Besides, god doesn't hold a seat in the judicial system.

You can believe that he will hold the highest seat in the final judgement, but that isn't the judicial system that we know.

a reply to: daskakik

It is when it is in Talcum powder.

a reply to: anonentity
Never had to get a prescription for that.

a reply to: Breakthestreak

99.6%.. means .4% chance but if you are not overweight with comorbidities you have a 75% less chance of mortality and if you are O blood group add another 25%plus. Which makes your chance of dying of it your of that group virtually nill. But if you have the vaccine. Then the odds certainly start to take off. They know this. So giving the vaccine is like them asking this group to play Russian roulette with their life. Just to be clear The chances of kids dying of it are even lower. So they want to gamble with children's lives.No wonder they have the Riot police out they know what is coming for them. They are definitely in too deep to turn back, so be very concerned. So you can see the average guy's concerns They want to give you something where each shot drops your own immune system by 25% per dose. It gets worse. but Just those figures prove that they are using the media to distract from genocide. What international code mentions that genocide is legal.?
If we have left all law and reason, fair enough. It was always a discipline that required a lot of effort anyway..
Take Spain it is the ninth country unable to furnish a sample of Sars covid two for an independent analysis. The Spanish ministry of health has failed to deliver as they are legally obliged to do. Which is adding weight that The Delta strain is basically the Vaccination, and the positive tests are being picked up from the proteins that the jab causes.www.bitchute.com... Imagine that it is a disease that you need to be tested for to see if you have it. It gets stranger by the day.
Just to be sure this Doc is on the ball and says that they are in Breach of the American constitution and the Nuremberg code, and they will be held accountable. Even the mask mandates are dangerous and aid infection a big kickback is coming, which will probably be catastrophically disruptive to society anyway.www.bitchute.com...

Actually there is a fifference between legal and lawful. An example would be like this. Legally, everyone can be sent to prison for committing a felony, but it would be unlawful. Legal is the letter of the law, lawful is spirit of the law.a reply to: daskakik

a reply to: chr0naut

You posted all those links...Im going by what the actual Electronic insert for the "approved" vax says (You know the one that can be changed electronically now because the insert has a QR code)

13 NONCLINICAL TOXICOLOGY
13.1 Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility
COMIRNATY has not been evaluated for the potential to cause carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, or impairment of
male fertility. In a developmental toxicity study in rats with COMIRNATY there were no vaccine-related
effects on female fertility [see Use in Specific Populations (8.1)]

FDA LINK to fact sheet (insert)

Seriously if it could be changed so easy why wasn't it? Or Your links weren't actual scientific studies? I see one link was an observational study, another says no data available, at least one is an article, another was a study done in 25 days...come on man this is science to You?

originally posted by: MDDoxs
a reply to: anonentity

Not experimental any more. I hope you can get over this.

Yes it is, since the non experimental version is not yet available.

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: MDDoxs
a reply to: anonentity

Not experimental any more. I hope you can get over this.

Yes it is, since the non experimental version is not yet available.

It's been available since Dec 2020 - Phase I - III is the experimental stage, it had the biggest trials of any vax or medicine. It's been in phase IV since it was made available to the public in Dec 2020 which is an optional, non experimental phase that investigates all suspected side effects in the less than 1 in 500,000 incidence rate.

They've been fully approved for several months now. It went through the exact same testing of any other med or vaccine but with far more accurate trials as around 10x the standard ammount of participants took part in the trials.

The reason it was developed quicker than past ones is it affects people in 1st world countries - usually big pharma doesn't allocate much/any funds or personel to develop vaccines - 90% of the time there's no vax development or studies being conducted as staff are busy trying to apply for grants and arguing against management and bearaucrats who are only iterested in profit rather than public health.

The Cov-19 vaccines had more researchers, resources and funds allocated to it than any previous vaccine or medicine. Science and technology have advanced significantly since sequencing could be condfucted and computers can analyse and compute mass ammounts of data. A candidate was already avaliable from day 1 as opposed to the usual 4 - 5 year period to find one.

The 'long-term effects' thing is a myth and misunderstanding of how clinical trials or how the vaccine works. It'd require a sample size of a few hundred million to seperate effects caused by trillions of envionmental variables and a one off vaccine, even then it's very wooly science that wouldn't produce a reliable result.

It may be a valid hypothesis for people getting regular boosters but otherwise it's a one off shot - it's not like a medicine people have to take daily that would be consumed 3650 times in a 10 year period and have a constant presence is blood/organs/brain etc.

a reply to: bastion

Only 1 vax has been given "full approval" and it is currently not available.

How can You have Phase IV trials without a control group? Everyone in previous control groups were immunized.

As for long term effects, We will all find those out together! I'm glad I won't personally have to experience any.

originally posted by: bastion

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: MDDoxs
a reply to: anonentity

Not experimental any more. I hope you can get over this.

Yes it is, since the non experimental version is not yet available.

It's been available since Dec 2020 - Phase I - III is the experimental stage, it had the biggest trials of any vax or medicine. It's been in phase IV since it was made available to the public in Dec 2020 which is an optional, non experimental phase that investigates all suspected side effects in the less than 1 in 500,000 incidence rate.

They've been fully approved for several months now. It went through the exact same testing of any other med or vaccine but with far more accurate trials as around 10x the standard ammount of participants took part in the trials.

The reason it was developed quicker than past ones is it affects people in 1st world countries - usually big pharma doesn't allocate much/any funds or personel to develop vaccines - 90% of the time there's no vax development or studies being conducted as staff are busy trying to apply for grants and arguing against management and bearaucrats who are only iterested in profit rather than public health.

The Cov-19 vaccines had more researchers, resources and funds allocated to it than any previous vaccine or medicine. Science and technology have advanced significantly since sequencing could be condfucted and computers can analyse and compute mass ammounts of data. A candidate was already avaliable from day 1 as opposed to the usual 4 - 5 year period to find one.

The 'long-term effects' thing is a myth and misunderstanding of how clinical trials or how the vaccine works. It'd require a sample size of a few hundred million to seperate effects caused by trillions of envionmental variables and a one off vaccine, even then it's very wooly science that wouldn't produce a reliable result.

It may be a valid hypothesis for people getting regular boosters but otherwise it's a one off shot - it's not like a medicine people have to take daily that would be consumed 3650 times in a 10 year period and have a constant presence is blood/organs/brain etc.

The problem though, and it is a very BIG one, is that so many lies are being told and laws being broken, esecially the US Constitution by Biden and company and many state governors forcing lockdowns, destroying businesses and sending old people to their deaths.
And because it is those Godless heathen types who are morally bankrupt trying to tell others they must get any vaccine is the reason that nobody should do it. That is being a patriotic American.
I can't trust those people, they are proven untrustworthy.
They are ESS -eighch -I -T human beings.

ETA: And they are using this to get huge kickbacks for their next reelection campaigns. A network of Criminals cooperating in tandem.

originally posted by: myselfaswell
a reply to: anonentity

What I don't get is the absence of common law with regard to informed consent and mandated injections. Source

What we know is it's impossible to give informed consent, because it's an experiment. So your employer gives you a mandate to get the spike. You go to get the spike, the person administering the spike cannot give you information for you to provide informed consent, because nobody can, so you reject the option of being spiked go back to your employer, tell them it's impossible to give informed consent, and then they give you the sack for not enrolling in the experiment.

Legally, I'm not seeing how that can work.

Have they not declared emergency?

Under the law of trespass, patients have a right not be subjected to an invasive procedure without consent or other lawful justification, such as an emergency or necessity.

a reply to: Kingnothing33

I had to read that part twice too. An emergency or necessity is seen as a legal justification for being injected.

The point I'm making is about Informed Consent. It cannot be given. You can be told of the litany of adverse reactions and ways of dying immediately after the injection, but you cannot be given the same for any length of time beyond which the experiment has been in existence. So a reasonable question like the following cannot be answered.

What adverse health effects exist that I could be exposed to, regardless of their rarity, after a period of 3 years.

Informed consent does not exist therefore making the injection mandatory, for any reason, should be illegal.

a reply to: willzilla
That is some freeman on the land type differentiation which is only recognized by those making those types of arguments.

At the end of the day a EUA is a type of approval and mandates for things like keeping a job are not forcing medical experimentation on anyone. You are free to consent or say no so Nuremberg code does not apply.

originally posted by: Hecate666

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: anonentity

The approved vaccines are not experimental.

Phase III trials have been completed and billions of doses have been administered.

They are experimental until we have mid to longterm data. Just because some corrupt agency is on the way to approval, waiting for the exact list of ingredients before they can finalise, doesn't make the clot shot magically safe.

Informed consent cannot be given until we get the full list of ingredients and the full long term data, nevermind how much your beloved dear leaders want you to put this poison into your veins.
This is in the experimental phase until 2023, officially and really should have been halted after the first deaths.

There is nothing safe and nobody has a crystal ball to see how it fares in 5-10 years, nobody, not the fda, nor the pharma industry, nor you nor me.

All we know is that it is lethal for tens of thousands and crippling for millions. So far, future not even included. With two braincells it is possible to see that the chances of it getting less damaging/fatal is zero. It can only take more healthy lives, regardless of any humans giving approval.
Which by the way can also be removed very quickly too.

Hence it's all babble and bootlicking to suggest this is approved and safe, when it logically really isn't.

Oh and human test subjects normally consent, get paid and get to be observed daily in proper trials. I worked in the field.

So, when do you think using a computer come out of the experimental phase?

LOL.

Well I signed at least two forms giving consent before I got the jab.

So yeah there's something to this in that they're not dragging people out of their houses and jabbing them without consent, they will make life very difficult for you unless you give consent and get the jab.

As long as the medical team have got the signature, how much the civil authorities and screws beat you around the head (not quite, yet) and threaten to starve you isn't their concern.

a reply to: anonentity

The whole idea of taking an experimental vaccine

Pfizer is FDA approved, therefore not experimental.

originally posted by: SirHardHarry
a reply to: anonentity

The whole idea of taking an experimental vaccine

Pfizer is FDA approved, therefore not experimental.

BUT NOT AVAILABLE!! So all jabs going into arms still is EXPERIMENTAL!!

a reply to: ATruGod

Correct, the "Comirnaty" is the one that approved by the FDA. At the time it was approved, wasn't readily available as I understand it. So, folks getting their Pfizer vaccine were not getting the approved version unbeknownst to them.

If you're forced to take the jab, make sure to ask to see the box the vaccine came in so you know you're getting the FDA approved vaccine, Comirnaty.