Midazolam Used To Kill Elderly, Creating 1st Wave of "COVID"

Hail the glorius NHS!

a reply to: AaarghZombies

I believe if you studied history, the last century in particular, you will find that entire populations can be complicit in some pretty awful stuff.

a reply to: GammaD

As in the US most British MP's do not really know what they are voting for, this was slipped under the rug if it is true and shows a level of incompetence and irresponsibility as well as downright corruption in parliament that needs to be addressed, sadly those that need to address the issue are the same flaming sod's that have committed the crime in the first place.

Oh from the late 60's the NHS has not been providing quality care to the elderly anyway, the emphasis was on getting working age people back up because the government did not want to be burdened with a group of old people forcing them to pay more pensions so unofficially there has been a policy killing the old off or letting them die rather than helping them, not one followed by every single member of the NHS staff but enough that it has done irreparable harm, the old are our memory, our conscience and they tell us what was before so losing them is like losing your way and getting lost.

The only ones that want the elderly gone are those that want to sell there homes from under them, to not be reminded as they do unconscionable things that they are doing evil etc.

The rest of us love our elderly relatives, we know they are a source of wisdom - most elderly do NOT go senile that is a stereotype and a lie - and a also our family.

Then along came the Liverpool Care Pathway.

It was originally a set of guidelines meant to help the dying whom could not be cured but was rolled out nationally and used even on healthy elderly patients ensuring they died, basically starving and dehydrating them while keeping them sedated it was an act of genocidal proportions that has still never been addressed properly and has been shoved under the rug.

Sadly like in the States people in the UK are STUPID, they let this happen to them and only see there own immediate well being as the route to what they want so those pulling the strings can laugh as the idiots run like rats chasing cheese in a metaphorical maze right to there own demise in the rat trap at the end.

a reply to: GammaD

Something else to consider:
Several countries all made the same "errors" of forcing elderly care homes to accept covid positive cases. 5 US states, (California, Michigan, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and of course New York) UK, Italy and France all under fire regarding COVID care home deaths.

Were they all advised by the same person?

I'd be curious to see McKinsey and CO's role in the international COVID response.

Not to mention UK's "Do not resuscitate" orders:
www.bbc.com...

Anything to up that death count!!

a reply to: AaarghZombies

From the same article in my post:

The DHSC said the request for extra stock was part of “national efforts to respond to the coronavirus outbreak”, which included precautions “to reduce the likelihood of future shortages”.

And note the guideline usage in my graphics (I worked hard on that to make the data quick and easily-absorbed).

a reply to: zosimov

Speaking of death counts, I just worked on this:

COVID Vaccinated Death Stats

6968 Total vaccinated deaths Dec 14, 2020 – Aug 23, 2021 source
160 deaths after 2 jabs Dec 14, 2020 – Apr 30, 2021 source
2063 deaths after 2 jabs May 1, 2021 – Aug 23, 2021 source
4745 deaths after 1 jab Dec 14, 2020 – Aug 23, 2021 Source: Math extrapolation (total deaths minus deaths after 2 jabs)


203 COVID-related deaths in USA as of March 19, 2020--the date the USA shut down source

So 203 deaths was enough to shut down our country and release hundreds of child traffickers out of prison, but 6968 deaths isn’t enough to stop the “vaccinations”?

Numbers always make sense; it is the language of absolutes. So, if the narrative isn't following the numbers, lies are being told. DID I MENTION THE PART ABOUT THE RELEASE OF HUNDREDS OF CHILD TRAFFICKERS FROM PRISON? Hmm...would be a prison break for the books.

originally posted by: glen200376

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: AaarghZombies

Exactly which means the op essentially calling our beloved NHS workers murderers!

Which sure don't sit right in the pit of my stomach considering the sacrifices they have made to keep our nation on its feet over the past few years.

Its shamefully below the belt and totally uncalled for considering they should saint those people instead of demonising them with spurious false nonsensical claims.

God bless our NHS and the staff who keep it running.

Here we go the cult like worship of a failing drain on the public purse,so full of unionised intitutionalised lazyness.
I bet you were a 'pot banger last year while your saviour the NHS was too busy tic tok dancing and hiding at home to see thousands of desperately ill people who had no option of any help.
Pay national insurance,get no service.
You do realise that the cult worship and virtue signalling of the NHS that your beloved government told you do was part of the phycological warfare against the popluation?
You scoffed it up without question,we know.
And for God's sake we know that you have had not one but two dose of Pitzer gene medication,you tell us every thread you enter.But you had no side affects so no one could possibly have had any side effects either,eh?

I doubt you know any doctors or nurses if you think they're lazy or a drain on the public purse. Upper management and contractors yes but frontline staff certainly aren't. The Unions constantly expose backdoor privatisation and how companies like Virgin cook the books, to try and make it appear like there's free beds in the secure units/sectioning wards they've taken over under the name 'NHS Care'

NHS staff were generally opposed to the 'clap for carers' gimmick as they see it as a duty and are content being overworked and underpaid rather than make millions in for profit healthcare that costs the individual 2 to 3 times more to recieve a far worse service. All it did was make people feel as if they'd made a difference by clapping their hands for 60 seconds once a week, when in reality they were making it easier for the pandemic to spread and increasing the work toll on NHS Staff.

If you're not getting proper treatment just quote the NHS Constitution and get treated by any specialist/international centre of excellence hospital in the UK and EU free of charge - staff and specialists are banned from telling patients about it by upper management. Within a month of quoting it you'll have appointments with a specialist team of world leading experts. NHS Constitution

That and the NICE Guidelines are vital tools for anyone - NICE (National Institute of Clinical Excellence) Guide: www.nice.org.uk...

originally posted by: glen200376
Hail the glorius NHS!

Just post the Bitchute version, you know that's what you really want to do.

originally posted by: zosimov
a reply to: AaarghZombies

I believe if you studied history, the last century in particular, you will find that entire populations can be complicit in some pretty awful stuff.

Usually motivated by fear, hatred, or anger.

And even then people spoke out. There were prison camps full of people who refused to be complicit.

How many care home owners have been dragged from their homes at night and shot on Wimbledon common recently as a warning to others?

originally posted by: GammaD
a reply to: zosimov

Speaking of death counts, I just worked on this:

COVID Vaccinated Death Stats

6968 Total vaccinated deaths Dec 14, 2020 – Aug 23, 2021 source
160 deaths after 2 jabs Dec 14, 2020 – Apr 30, 2021 source
2063 deaths after 2 jabs May 1, 2021 – Aug 23, 2021 source
4745 deaths after 1 jab Dec 14, 2020 – Aug 23, 2021 Source: Math extrapolation (total deaths minus deaths after 2 jabs)


203 COVID-related deaths in USA as of March 19, 2020--the date the USA shut down source

So 203 deaths was enough to shut down our country and release hundreds of child traffickers out of prison, but 6968 deaths isn’t enough to stop the “vaccinations”?

Numbers always make sense; it is the language of absolutes. So, if the narrative isn't following the numbers, lies are being told. DID I MENTION THE PART ABOUT THE RELEASE OF HUNDREDS OF CHILD TRAFFICKERS FROM PRISON? Hmm...would be a prison break for the books.

From your own source

FDA requires healthcare providers to report any death after COVID-19 vaccination to VAERS, even if it’s unclear whether the vaccine was the cause.

also from your source

Reports of adverse events to VAERS following vaccination, including deaths, do not necessarily mean that a vaccine caused a health problem.

Your source also says that only the total number of deaths recorded only amounts to 0.0019% of people who were vaccinated. And even then these deaths haven't actually been confirmed as being due to the vaccine.

Covid is 97% survivable. The vaccine is 99.9981% survivable, and that's even if 100% of suspected deaths were caused by the shot. Which they weren't.

a reply to: glen200376

Naw but i did take the weans down and let them do it while i whistled.

Nothing to do with with Gods sake, far as i can establish, just common sense.

As to cult worship, do you mean like the faith you place in this nonsense?

Your in good company with David Icke.

This should have been your thread should it not?

As to paying national insurance and getting no service, that's just a blatant lie as is your rhetoric regarding them offing poor old souls with you Midazolam nonsense.

a reply to: glen200376

The ""Philosophers Stone"" really?

Well seen its "Selected views from the boat"

Coz your all out to sea.

Canny wait to see how that sort of bullcrap fly's in a court of law.

Not very high or even off the ground would be my bet.

You should be singing the NHS praise instead of accusing them of murder ffs.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: zosimov
a reply to: AaarghZombies

I believe if you studied history, the last century in particular, you will find that entire populations can be complicit in some pretty awful stuff.

Usually motivated by fear, hatred, or anger.

And even then people spoke out. There were prison camps full of people who refused to be complicit.

How many care home owners have been dragged from their homes at night and shot on Wimbledon common recently as a warning to others?

Yep, motivated by fear and anger. What's different now?

And those who speak out are called "whistle blowers" and maligned.

originally posted by: zosimov
a reply to: GammaD

Something else to consider:
Several countries all made the same "errors" of forcing elderly care homes to accept covid positive cases. 5 US states, (California, Michigan, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and of course New York) UK, Italy and France all under fire regarding COVID care home deaths.

Were they all advised by the same person?

I'd be curious to see McKinsey and CO's role in the international COVID response.

Not to mention UK's "Do not resuscitate" orders:
www.bbc.com...

Anything to up that death count!!

That's somewhat of a miscaracterization.

Yes, care homes were forced to take vulnerable people during the pandemic, but they're always forced to take them. This wasn't something new. And these people that they were forced to take hadn't been confirmed to have covid. IF they had been confirmed to have Covid they'd have been isolated like any other person with Covid.

The real scandal here was that the care homes didn't have proper infectious disease controls in place. Carers moved between residents without changing their PPE, and other bad practices. And spread Covid among the residents.

In the UK they have a policy of caring for people in their own homes. Essentially people stay put and care staff come to them several times during the day (Mostly because the government sold off the state owned care homes, and made the private ones extremely expensive through over regulation). They found that instances of Covid were higher as a percentage of the population among care staff than among care recipients. In effect, the care staff were acting as super spreaders.

a reply to: zosimov
Fear is the root.....anger and hatred are manifested symptoms.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

As far as im aware, it may vary from care company to company, but there carers are tested once a week with the tests we would send away, and are encouraged to use the PCR tests daily.

The daily carers were indeed considered to be super spreaders back when the virus was at it peak, my Mrs has a few good mates that work as Carers for "Cordia Services".

originally posted by: zosimov

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: zosimov
a reply to: AaarghZombies

I believe if you studied history, the last century in particular, you will find that entire populations can be complicit in some pretty awful stuff.

Usually motivated by fear, hatred, or anger.

And even then people spoke out. There were prison camps full of people who refused to be complicit.

How many care home owners have been dragged from their homes at night and shot on Wimbledon common recently as a warning to others?

Yep, motivated by fear and anger. What's different now?

I'm what you might call a more mature member. Which is a polite way of saying that I grew up before the iron curtain came up.

I lived under one of the governments that you're probably thinking of, and I can honestly tell you that what you're seeing now isn't 1% of what went on back in the day. You're living in a golden age of freedom and democracy compared to life under communism.

When you're woken up in the middle of the night to the sound of the secret police breaking into your neighbors house and dragging them and their entire family out, you don't go out into the street and remonstrate. You pull the covers tight over your head and you bite down on your anger and your fear, because you know that if you so much as twitch that curtain then your entire family could be next.

This isn't complicity, it's survival.

Right now in the west "whistle blowers" aren't being put sent to secret prisons to be tortured. Care home owners aren't disappearing in the middle of the night, and nobody is being dragged out into the woods and shot.

So, and a say this with all sincerity, don't even think of comparing what is happening now with what went on in the past.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: AaarghZombies

As far as im aware, it it may vary from care company to company, but there carers are tested once a week with the tests we would send away, and are encouraged to use the PCR tests daily.

The daily carers were indeed considered to be super spreaders back when the virus was at it peak, my Mrs has a few good mates that work as Carers for Cordia Services.

Those kits weren't really available when the scandal started, I don't think that they came out until after the care home scandal had broken in the press.

I don't like playing the blame game, but it does need to be acknowledged that while the state did put those people into care homes it was the care homes who allowed Covid to spread because they didn't observe best practice.

Every care home should have an infectious disease protocol, just for normal things live norovirus. They knew that there was a pandemic, and that it was airborne through droplets that lingered on surfaces, so they should have put in place tough disinfection regimes, and they should have mandated that carers changed their PPE and decontaminated between residents, but many didn't. They made a bad situation worse.

a reply to: AaarghZombies
The 'emergency' was to save the vulnerable......

UK: Older people in care homes abandoned to die amid government failures during COVID-19 pandemic
www.amnesty.org... ic/

a reply to: AaarghZombies

That pretty much nails it.

Certainly did not help that the Hospitals were dumping the poor sods with COVID 19 back in to the care facilities thus perpetuating the cycle and spread of the disease.

As to the tests, your right, they did not have them to being with, just the PPI equipment provided, and sometimes not even then.

Thing with those carers through is if they did not do the job they do, pandemic or otherwise, a lot of poor old people would ether be dead or have no quality of life whatsoever.