It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
News of the contaminant could provide a fresh setback for Japan's inoculation drive as it struggles to persuade many — particularly young people — to get vaccinated
originally posted by: HawkEyi
I would problary not go anywhere near getting the mRNA vaxs.
Shall we talk about the data from Israel how the vax are the ones getting in the hostpial more over the un vaxed?
Is that a fact? I know that the immune response declines, not unexpected. It seems to do so with those who are unvaccinated (but infected) as well. I also know that currently the FDA is considering an 8 month booster. I hadn't heard about "every six/five months." Do you have a source or did you just make that up?
or the fact that you would need a booster shot every six/five months?
originally posted by: HawkEyi
a reply to: Phage
Shall we talk about the data from Israel how the vax are the ones getting in the hostpial more over the un vaxed? or the fact that you would need a booster shot every six/five months?
This means that vaxxing is succeeding.
The unvaxxed are getting sick at a much higher rate. Particularly the young.
Which is exactly what you would expect.
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
originally posted by: HawkEyi
a reply to: Phage
Shall we talk about the data from Israel how the vax are the ones getting in the hostpial more over the un vaxed? or the fact that you would need a booster shot every six/five months?
Israeli has 8 in 10 of its population vaxxed. Yet they make up only 6 in 10 of the seriously ill.
This means that vaxxing is succeeding.
This means that vaxxing is succeeding.
So it's only really the elderly vaxed who are getting sick. Which is exactly what you would expect.