60 minutes UFO show this Sunday May 16th

originally posted by: The GUT

Btw: Have you noticed that the current batch of Disclosure folk (TTSA, Mellon, Elizondo, et al) seem to be suggesting an answer that's sounds like the IDH rather than the ETH?

What's better than the "leprechauns did it" defence?
Leprechaun ghosts of course!.....because they leave even less physical evidence.

If they have everyone busy discussing whether it's the ghosts of leprechauns or actual leprechauns....no one will ask questions about the possibility of a "NWO spec ops minivan" (props to Mbkennel).

"Well, I've watched 60 Minutes, and I'm saying to myself, they're motivated, they're happening, I.E. they want something..... "

New opinion piece in the NYT this morning about UFO's

The most curious subplot in the news right now is the admission, at the most senior levels of the United States government, that the military services have collected visuals, data and testimonials recording flying objects they cannot explain; that they are investigating these phenomena seriously; and that they will, in the coming months, report at least some of their findings to the public. It feels, at times, like the beginning of a film where everyone is going about their lives, even as the earthshaking events unfurl on a silenced television in the background.

www.nytimes.com...=https://t.co/IzDZvEdaCN

Nothing new to most, but just an opinion on how things are unfolding right now

a reply to: mirageman

I looked at that picture a few times. Wicked smiles.

originally posted by: Jukiodone

What's better than the "leprechauns did it" defence?
Leprechaun ghosts of course!.....because they leave even less physical evidence.

If they have everyone busy discussing whether it's the ghosts of leprechauns or actual leprechauns....no one will ask questions about the possibility of a "NWO spec ops minivan" (props to Mbkennel).

You do have a point to ponder, Jukiodone.

Personally I expect a mix of truth & lie coming. We might, for example, get some heretofore unrevealed quantum or new physics tidbits that supports whatever narrative they're selling. Anything after that, however, caveat emptor.

Good to see ya' man.

a reply to: vlawde

That piece quotes from Harry Reid....

Harry Reid, the former Senate majority leader from Nevada, emerges as the key actor. ...He told Lewis-Kraus that he believed there was crash debris held by Lockheed Martin, but when he asked the Pentagon to see it, he was refused access. “I tried to get, as I recall, a classified approval by the Pentagon to have me go look at the stuff,” he said. “They would not approve that.”

Yet he told the Las Vegas Sun four days before this NYT piece was published....

“I’ve never believed Lockheed had anything in that regard, even though a lot of people believe that — I don’t.

” As to whether any UFO fragments are stored away in some other government or contractor’s warehouse, Reid is doubtful: “I never heard of anything, other than some conspiratorialists. So I don’t think that they’re credible that they’re things from outer space.”

So if he Reid never believed LHM had any remnants of UFO crash materials then why did he seek access to them?

And has he forgotten that the NYT originally told us how the $22m he handed to Bigelow was spent....

The funding went to Mr. Bigelow’s company, Bigelow Aerospace, which hired subcontractors and solicited research for the program.

Under Mr. Bigelow’s direction, the company modified buildings in Las Vegas for the storage of metal alloys and other materials that Mr. Elizondo and program contractors said had been recovered from unidentified aerial phenomena.

Why didn't Harry give his chum Bigelow a call and ask for a visit around his UFO warehouse? Or was that a lie?

This is the conundrum journalists should be asking about. But these questions mysteriously evade them.

a reply to: mirageman


Give what you wrote to that rag of a paper the Sun. You even get paid for a story. See if they start to question or perhaps they will only print something about Aliens with six heads, the usual slop.

The big question is: After all these years, why now?

After decades of denial, why is the middle of the biggest global catastrophe since WWll the right time to allow military revelations on the existence of UFOs.

I’d don’t have an answer, but I know that’s the question.

a reply to: McGinty

Maybe, just maybe, someone is forcing their hand. Also, there's lots going on around the world now that can potentially take away the heat from any groundbreaking revelations, making it easier to come forth with such information.

Worth mentioning is that tides may have shifted in terms of internal power struggles within departments/agencies. I think we often envision governments as one cohesive entity when in fact it's a mish mash of opposing views, fierce competition, and several kings of their respective hills.

a reply to: Skeletonized

All of that may be true. It could also be a distraction from the other major developments, such as the pandemic, or the Middle East.

Or maybe the latest false flag to lead a debate that paints Russia, or China as responsible, facilitating actions/sanctions. Public opinion against both these nations is perhaps on a tipping point, though not enough to justify more severe action. Add into the mix that they’re flying right above the west daily, rehearsing for an attack and the public will throw their money at the military corporate manufacturers to catch up with this hi-tech.

He is a short preview.

3 links for a refresher that gets us to this point in time before the upcoming 60 Minutes show:

The direct source for the UAP reporting mandate on page 11 ..... Advanced Aerial Threats

www.congress.gov...

The direct source that shows The Who’s Who distribution list (page 2). Page 1 further reporting instructions

media.defense.gov...

YouTube vid of Marco Rubio mentioning a possible delay for the June report. (I sense a Here We Go Again coming)

m.youtube.com...

June Report:

Don't worry, we know what these things are, but due to national security reasons it can't be disclosed at this time. No it's not extraterrestrials.

:There ya go. The public flavor.


Behind closed doors?
They are: Nuclear powered unmanned vehicles. Who's are they, is the question. They could be ours, they could be Chinese, they could be Russian.
If they are ours, the government will either leave the UFO question open ended, or the June report will look like what I stated. If they are identified as coming from a specific country of origin? The June report might indicate that we know what they are, but again, they might not say who/what. At the end of the day, I would wager at least triple digits of $$$ that these are nuclear UAV.

Check for tv air time in your time zone...Sun May 16

The transcript of the show....

UFOs regularly spotted in restricted U.S. airspace, report on the phenomena due next month

www.cbsnews.com...

Extended Fravor/Dietrich segment here: www.cbsnews.com...

Dietrich (who has a touch of the Ellen Ripleys about her) is another great eye witness IMO.

Interesting to note her descriptor of the Tic Tac movement (like a ping pong ball according to Fravor) was "like when your phone bounces off a counter top".

She then does an interesting rapid "falling leaf" movement with her hands before concluding with a clarification of "no predictable movement".

a reply to: Jukiodone

If the people were smart they'd roll their eyes at the gov.
And say extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
If DNA evidence and film footage isn't evidence for Bigfoot.
Then video footage isn't evidence for the carefully timed
deception they're unveiling now.

Here's the 13:47 minute segment, no commercials either.

I'm beginning to think that this is nothing more than a massive money laundering scam being conducted by people in the government using tax payer's money to show the public that "something is being done". In the mean time the truth it that a select group of people get a free for all credit card that can be used at the expense of the American People. Oh why make it all public?

Well if someone gets caught, then the IG can say that mishandling of the budget took place and was corrected. Since no one would know who or how much of the money is in the budget no one would know the full scale of the crime.

Full disclosure on my part:
I have been lucky enough to talk to a few people that have seen some of these UFO/UAPs while out to sea. One of the key takeaways from talking to them was that they are pissed that every time a real report is disclosed, another report goes along with it that is not what they reported. They are mad because the government is pushing out HOAXes along with real reports.

My personal belief is that the fake reports are being tossed out there so that the situation can be inflated. It's not like the situation needs to be inflated, but by making the situation more massive than it is, "people" can request more money to "deal" with the issue. So they can say that they are telling us the truth about UFO/UAPs, but at the same time allow the reports (the fakes) to be picked apart by skeptics.

If I'm right about this, billions have been wasted on something that has nothing to do with UFO/UAPs, and instead have been used for some other reason. The question is; "Where did the money go, and why do they need more now?"

a reply to: Randyvine

Its excellent confirmatory EWT of something most rational people suspect to be terrestrial/natural in origin.
Dont understand your haiku about bigfoot.