It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: jjkenobi
originally posted by: Tekner
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: JAGStorm
This actually sounds perfectly reasonable to me, a lot of people don't want the vaccine for emotional reasons, not scientific ones.
They've read some horror story and now they're scared. So address those fears.
If a child is afraid to go to the dentist you don't tell them how safe dentists are, you tell them that it won't hurt.
This sounds perfectly unreasonable to me, a lot of people want the vaccine for emotional reasons, not scientific ones.
They've read some horror story about COVID and now they're scared. So address those fears.
Maybe they should fear a vaccine that's more deadly than the disease.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: M5xaz
a reply to: JAGStorm
Feelings ?
Instead of science based data ?
I'll give you science-based data:
1. 99.4% of Covid cases are MILD
www.worldometers.info...?Si
2. J&J and AstraZeneca are each LESS THAN 70 % effective, and merely "reduce symptoms"
3. They BOTH have been reported to cause deadly clots and have been suspended by health authorities for that reason.
4. NONE of the vaccines have long term safety data and are only out because of "emergency use authorization". At the time the development of these vaccines was started, it was feared the covid death rate could be very high, which justified their development. We now know that this is NOT the case: 99.4% of cases are MILD.
5. The only and main issue is the size of hospital ICUs. A valid point, vastly undersized and something that would have need to be addressed given the aging boomer population, even if Covid had never showed up. To my knowledge, NO government is fixing this, the clear and obvious problem.
6. If you want the vaccine, go ahead. I will wait for more safety data to come in.
NO FORCIBLE VACCINE OR PASSPORT CRAP !!
Your source also says 2% of cases resulted in death.
Does that mean death is a mild outcome?
originally posted by: M5xaz
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: M5xaz
a reply to: JAGStorm
Feelings ?
Instead of science based data ?
I'll give you science-based data:
1. 99.4% of Covid cases are MILD
www.worldometers.info...?Si
2. J&J and AstraZeneca are each LESS THAN 70 % effective, and merely "reduce symptoms"
3. They BOTH have been reported to cause deadly clots and have been suspended by health authorities for that reason.
4. NONE of the vaccines have long term safety data and are only out because of "emergency use authorization". At the time the development of these vaccines was started, it was feared the covid death rate could be very high, which justified their development. We now know that this is NOT the case: 99.4% of cases are MILD.
5. The only and main issue is the size of hospital ICUs. A valid point, vastly undersized and something that would have need to be addressed given the aging boomer population, even if Covid had never showed up. To my knowledge, NO government is fixing this, the clear and obvious problem.
6. If you want the vaccine, go ahead. I will wait for more safety data to come in.
NO FORCIBLE VACCINE OR PASSPORT CRAP !!
Your source also says 2% of cases resulted in death.
Does that mean death is a mild outcome?
The same source indicated that the death rate of those without underlying conditions is 0.7%
The CDC indicated that over 94% of the death of people attributed to Covid had underlying conditions.
And,
I am not stopping anyone from taking these experimental vaccines.
If you do you will be protected.
My body my choice, right ?
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: JAGStorm
The push for everyone to be vaccinated is unnatural. Those who don't get it will lead a better, longer life, health-wise.
originally posted by: LordAhriman
originally posted by: M5xaz
99.4% of Covid cases are MILD
You're ignoring that 2% of people die from it. 1 in every 50. How can those cases be "MiLd"?
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: M5xaz
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: M5xaz
a reply to: JAGStorm
Feelings ?
Instead of science based data ?
I'll give you science-based data:
1. 99.4% of Covid cases are MILD
www.worldometers.info...?Si
2. J&J and AstraZeneca are each LESS THAN 70 % effective, and merely "reduce symptoms"
3. They BOTH have been reported to cause deadly clots and have been suspended by health authorities for that reason.
4. NONE of the vaccines have long term safety data and are only out because of "emergency use authorization". At the time the development of these vaccines was started, it was feared the covid death rate could be very high, which justified their development. We now know that this is NOT the case: 99.4% of cases are MILD.
5. The only and main issue is the size of hospital ICUs. A valid point, vastly undersized and something that would have need to be addressed given the aging boomer population, even if Covid had never showed up. To my knowledge, NO government is fixing this, the clear and obvious problem.
6. If you want the vaccine, go ahead. I will wait for more safety data to come in.
NO FORCIBLE VACCINE OR PASSPORT CRAP !!
Your source also says 2% of cases resulted in death.
Does that mean death is a mild outcome?
The same source indicated that the death rate of those without underlying conditions is 0.7%
The CDC indicated that over 94% of the death of people attributed to Covid had underlying conditions.
And,
I am not stopping anyone from taking these experimental vaccines.
If you do you will be protected.
My body my choice, right ?
A lot of people have underlying conditions and death isn't the only outcome from catching covid.
I agree it's your choice, but the evidence in favour of being vaccinated is pretty clear.
originally posted by: JAGStorm
www.yahoo.com...
I've also had a very close relative die from complications of a debilitating vaccine side effect.
originally posted by: M5xaz
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: M5xaz
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: M5xaz
a reply to: JAGStorm
Feelings ?
Instead of science based data ?
I'll give you science-based data:
1. 99.4% of Covid cases are MILD
www.worldometers.info...?Si
2. J&J and AstraZeneca are each LESS THAN 70 % effective, and merely "reduce symptoms"
3. They BOTH have been reported to cause deadly clots and have been suspended by health authorities for that reason.
4. NONE of the vaccines have long term safety data and are only out because of "emergency use authorization". At the time the development of these vaccines was started, it was feared the covid death rate could be very high, which justified their development. We now know that this is NOT the case: 99.4% of cases are MILD.
5. The only and main issue is the size of hospital ICUs. A valid point, vastly undersized and something that would have need to be addressed given the aging boomer population, even if Covid had never showed up. To my knowledge, NO government is fixing this, the clear and obvious problem.
6. If you want the vaccine, go ahead. I will wait for more safety data to come in.
NO FORCIBLE VACCINE OR PASSPORT CRAP !!
Your source also says 2% of cases resulted in death.
Does that mean death is a mild outcome?
The same source indicated that the death rate of those without underlying conditions is 0.7%
The CDC indicated that over 94% of the death of people attributed to Covid had underlying conditions.
And,
I am not stopping anyone from taking these experimental vaccines.
If you do you will be protected.
My body my choice, right ?
A lot of people have underlying conditions and death isn't the only outcome from catching covid.
I agree it's your choice, but the evidence in favour of being vaccinated is pretty clear.
As are the risks of EXPERIMENTAL vaccines, so bad that you cannot sue if any harm ensues.
Again, your choice, my choice.
NO FACISM
originally posted by: Dorian7
originally posted by: JAGStorm
www.yahoo.com...
I've also had a very close relative die from complications of a debilitating vaccine side effect.
If you don't mind me asking, which vaccine did they take? What state was this in? What was the age of the deceased? Did they have any underlying health issues which may have made it more likely death would occur? Would you be willing to answer a few more questions offline? I am on a task force researching death claims and would like to know more. I would also need to know WHERE this person received the vaccine (geo-location and not in the arm, that one I know ) Thanks
originally posted by: fiverx313
there's no convincing anyone really... i just hope as time goes on and they see it's safe enough, they decide to go for it. til then, 100% their choice.