It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Camperguy
a reply to: Gryphon66
You know as well as I do an absentee ballot is vetted a mail in is not. It is supposed to be compared to a signature on file. It would have been impossible to compare signatures of that many mail in ballots in that amount of time. The rejection rates would have been astronomical. Ah the crazy Republican hillbillies precincts, and the thousands of affidavits? Mass hallucinations? If that makes you feel better remember that when they vote your rights away in the name of National security . Like I said this isn't about that its about election integrity. All we have left that is non violent is voting, we lose that and we'll need to burn cities down like those Antifa animals so our voices will be heard. Obviously it must work, they don't get arrested, they don't get covid and no matter what they do its mostly peaceful.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Ksihkehe
You're referring to the FBI investigation into the Trump Campaign's communications with Russian agents? That turned out to be factual, so I can't see that as a coup attempt, but I accept that is your position.
originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Ksihkehe
You're referring to the FBI investigation into the Trump Campaign's communications with Russian agents? That turned out to be factual, so I can't see that as a coup attempt, but I accept that is your position.
Are you referring to the Mueller report? The one which stated, in absolutely no uncertain terms, that there is no evidence Trump or anybody else was acting as a Russian agent? Do you mean that report?
Russian collusion is a hoax. You own investigations have proven it was a hoax. Stop clinging to it.
The Committee found that the Russian government engaged in an aggressive, multifaceted effort to influence, or attempt to influence, the outcome of the 2016 presidential election. Parts of this effort are outlined in the Committee's earlier volumes on election security, social media, the Obama Administration's response to the threat, and the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA).
The Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election in sweeping and systematic fashion. Evidence of Russian government operations began to surface in mid-2016. In June, the Democratic National Committee and its cyber response team publicly announced that Russian hackers had compromised its computer network. Releases of hacked materials—hacks that public reporting soon attributed to the Russian government—began that same month. Additional releases followed in July through the organization WikiLeaks, with further releases in October and November.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Perhaps while Congress is meeting in joint session that day they can go ahead and impeach him again and remove him from office for sedition, abuse of Presidential power, obstruction of justice etc. I doubt it though as Congress is spineless.
I have to admit, seeing him perp-walked off the Mall would be epic though.
originally posted by: AlbatrossMaker
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Perhaps while Congress is meeting in joint session that day they can go ahead and impeach him again and remove him from office for sedition, abuse of Presidential power, obstruction of justice etc. I doubt it though as Congress is spineless.
I have to admit, seeing him perp-walked off the Mall would be epic though.
Lol. 45 wasn’t impeached. Grow up
More erotica? Sure seems like fantasy
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Perhaps while Congress is meeting in joint session that day they can go ahead and impeach him again and remove him from office for sedition, abuse of Presidential power, obstruction of justice etc. I doubt it though as Congress is spineless.
I have to admit, seeing him perp-walked off the Mall would be epic though.