FEC chairman debunks MSM claims of ‘no fraud’

FEC chairman debunks MSM claims of ‘no fraud’, says counting illegal votes can make election ‘illegitimate’

Trey Trainor says claims of voter fraud in battleground states is credible.

In a recent interview, he pointed out that Democrat officials removing GOP poll watchers from polling locations is a violation of state law and federal court orders.

“When you have claims of, you know, 10,000 people who don’t live in the state of Nevada having voted in Neveda, you have the video…they’re (poll workers) either duplicating a spoiled ballot there or they’re in the process of marking a ballot that came in blank for a vote,” Trainor explained.

The interview in question:

He goes on to say...

The FEC chief added, he agrees with the Trump campaign’s lawsuits and said their observers were denied meaningful access. Trainor also said questionable actions by the Democrats may render this election illegitimate.

Whether the lawsuits, especially involving Dominion, are effective remains to be seen, but it certainly can't hurt to have the FEC chairman's agreement that fraud has and is taking place.

a reply to: Klassified

be prepared for he's a trump republican appointee, you know it's coming.

The Federal Election Commission chairman is Right On Target.

And another example of fraud today. 9600 votes for Joe Biden were identified in Georgia this morning, that did not exist. Phantom votes that will reduce his lead even further.

mobile.twitter.com...

originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: Klassified

be prepared for he's a trump republican appointee, you know it's coming.

Correct, notwitthstanding that, the FEC only has a couple of members and no quorum, therefore no operational clout.

this is just one man on his own spoofing, (they are not short of money though)

originally posted by: smurfy

originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: Klassified

be prepared for he's a trump republican appointee, you know it's coming.

Correct, notwitthstanding that, the FEC only has a couple of members and no quorum, therefore no operational clout.

this is just one man on his own spoofing, (they are not short of money though)

Spoofing? I do not see any place he pretended to be someone or something he is not.

originally posted by: Klassified
counting-illegal-votes-can-make-election-illegitimate

Though it is obvious to the rest of us, the Biden voters have not figured this out yet.

I don't believe the MSM or anyone has claimed "no fraud". Just no fraud of consequence that would change the outcome of anything.

Fraud happens in every election. But is so minimal as to be moot. Should it be investigated? Yes. And if found to be true, prosecuted. But it won't change the election results.

Also this is OAN. What do you expect to hear?

As Paul Harvey used to say, "the rest of the story".

If you take both stories and look at the information, you can see what each have left out and figure out the real story from there. At least it's a starting point.

originally posted by: Klassified

originally posted by: smurfy

originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: Klassified

be prepared for he's a trump republican appointee, you know it's coming.

Correct, notwitthstanding that, the FEC only has a couple of members and no quorum, therefore no operational clout.

this is just one man on his own spoofing, (they are not short of money though)

Spoofing? I do not see any place he pretended to be someone or something he is not.

Spoofing has more than a singular definition, Trainor is the FEC chairman, being so does not mean he must need to tell the truth, since there are only two members and have no quorum to operate. In other words, he's only speaking for himself...not the FEC.

a reply to: Gnawledge

No they switched up when it became undeniable. The irony of the TV screaming Russia Russia for 4 years when trump is in office and then when there's a chance he's out it's "PeRfeCtLy SeCUrE ElECTiON TiMe" the hypocrisy and deceit it obvious to anyone with 2 brain cells.

a reply to: smurfy

In that case the news is the biggest spoof in history. I wish they would stop spoofing. Too many spoofs not enough truth.

But if the msm keeps lying that the election had no fraud then can't we all just believe it is so, just a little bit?

originally posted by: SuicideKing33
a reply to: smurfy

In that case the news is the biggest spoof in history. I wish they would stop spoofing. Too many spoofs not enough truth.

The mainstream media is doing the same thing with covid-19.... and have been since March.

originally posted by: SuicideKing33
a reply to: Gnawledge

No they switched up when it became undeniable. The irony of the TV screaming Russia Russia for 4 years when trump is in office and then when there's a chance he's out it's "PeRfeCtLy SeCUrE ElECTiON TiMe" the hypocrisy and deceit it obvious to anyone with 2 brain cells.

With ONLY two brain cells, perhaps.

originally posted by: smurfy

originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: Klassified

be prepared for he's a trump republican appointee, you know it's coming.

Correct, notwitthstanding that, the FEC only has a couple of members and no quorum, therefore no operational clout.

this is just one man on his own spoofing, (they are not short of money though)

And, if he didn't say what Trump wants him to say, he'd get fired.

originally posted by: HalWesten
As Paul Harvey used to say, "the rest of the story".

If you take both stories and look at the information, you can see what each have left out and figure out the real story from there. At least it's a starting point.

I wish Paul Harvey were still around. We may have some truth and a light-hearted ending to this story at least.

I don't see the taking of OAN and the MSM as both sides here though. It's just two extremes - taken together we don't end up in the middle we end up only muddled and confused, angry or apathetic.

originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: Klassified

be prepared for he's a trump republican appointee, you know it's coming.

Is that an untruth?

" you have the video…they’re (poll workers) either duplicating a spoiled ballot there or they’re in the process of marking a ballot that came in blank for a vote,” Trainor explained."

Is this really the Federal Election Commission chairman talking suspiciously about video of ballot transcribers? Jesus, no wonder he thinks there's widespread fraud, he doesn't know how the hell ballots work. There's probably HUNDREDS of those videos because they, literally, have to have cameras pointed at them BY LAW.

And how is that debunking anything? He just stated they COULD be doing their job closely monitored by legally required cameras, or they could be committing fraud on a large scale even though both republicans and democrats are involved in the process.

originally posted by: SuicideKing33
a reply to: Gnawledge

No they switched up when it became undeniable. The irony of the TV screaming Russia Russia for 4 years when trump is in office and then when there's a chance he's out it's "PeRfeCtLy SeCUrE ElECTiON TiMe" the hypocrisy and deceit it obvious to anyone with 2 brain cells.

Just to make this clear - - and imagine is Mueller had been able to continue his investigation.

Mr Mueller said he had not exonerated Mr Trump of obstruction of justice.

The former FBI director spent two years probing alleged collusion between the 2016 Trump campaign and Russia, but did not establish collusion in a crime.

He concluded that Russia had interfered in the election with the intention of benefitting Mr Trump's campaign.

Mr Mueller said he had not exonerated Mr Trump of obstruction of justice.

The former FBI director spent two years probing alleged collusion between the 2016 Trump campaign and Russia, but did not establish collusion in a crime.

He concluded that Russia had interfered in the election with the intention of benefitting Mr Trump's campaign.

www.bbc.com...

originally posted by: Gnawledge
I don't believe the MSM or anyone has claimed "no fraud". Just no fraud of consequence that would change the outcome of anything.

Fraud happens in every election. But is so minimal as to be moot. Should it be investigated? Yes. And if found to be true, prosecuted. But it won't change the election results.

Also this is OAN. What do you expect to hear?

did you just do that? Wow.

SMMFH.