Naval Intelligence Admits To Possessing "SECRET" Tic Tac Video

Whatever is flying the tic tacs is the same group flying the spheres or orbs

Are they from this planet?

Is the secret banking cabal?

Are they reptilians?

Is it the Nephilim from Genesis that came down and made giants with humans before the flood?

Is it Enki and Enlil?

Are they fallen angels?

What is the truth?

originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan
Top-secret UFO files could ‘gravely damage’ US national security, Navy says
Video of an ET craft isn’t going to “gravely damage” US national security.

Top-secret UFO files would cover EVERYTHING. Not just the videos but what is behind the videos. As in where the craft is from, what kind of creature is flying them and how many there are.

originally posted by: toysforadults
Whatever is flying the tic tacs is the same group flying the spheres or orbs

How do we know that they are the same visitors flying all these things. Are the saucers being flown by the same species flying the triangles? Are the triangles being flown by the same species controlling the tic tacs?

But you are asking the right questions, the ones we should all be asking.

a reply to: spiritualarchitect

Honestly I don't, but how weird would it be if there were several species of ET that didn't communicate or collaborate with one another all visiting for tens of thousands of years?

a reply to: toysforadults
Okay, I see what you mean. I too assume that all the ones that are visiting at the same time are in communication with each other.

They are the Spanish, Dutch and English. We are the Native Americans wondering who these people are with the cloud boats and where they came from.

CBS had a brief piece on this today:

These top-secret files included several "briefing slides" about the incident, provided to the ONI by an unnamed agency. (Because ONI officials did not classify the slides personally, they are unable to declassify them, the spokesperson added).

The ONI also admitted to possessing at least one video of unknown length, classified as "secret" by the Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR). ONI didn't reveal whether this footage is the same 1-minute video that was leaked online in 2007 and widely released by The New York Times in 2017. However, in November 2019, several naval officers who witnessed the incident aboard the Nimitz told Popular Mechanics that they had seen a much longer video of the encounter that was between 8 and 10 minutes long. These original recordings were promptly collected and erased by "unknown individuals" who arrived on the ship by helicopter shortly after the incident, one officer said.

An "unnamed agency" providing briefing slides.
"Unknown individuals" arriving by helicopter and erasing the longer video.

I love it.
All we're missing is a reference to one of those unknown individuals being a chain smoker....

originally posted by: Gandalf77
All we're missing is a reference to one of those unknown individuals being a chain smoker....

We have 3 different witnesses saying 3 different things. One says they were wearing flight suits of the kind they give you when you board the helicopter. One said they were wearing Air Force uniforms under those flight suits. The other says they were wearing civilian clothes. No one mentions smoking.

originally posted by: spiritualarchitect

originally posted by: Gandalf77
All we're missing is a reference to one of those unknown individuals being a chain smoker....

We have 3 different witnesses saying 3 different things. One says they were wearing flight suits of the kind they give you when you board the helicopter. One said they were wearing Air Force uniforms under those flight suits. The other says they were wearing civilian clothes. No one mentions smoking.

Sorry, bad joke perhaps. I was making a reference to the "smoking man" character from the X-Files.

WTF?!

The U.S. Navy says the Tic-Tac UFO files could cause "grave damage" to national security if released.

www.space.com...

originally posted by: carewemust

WTF?!

The U.S. Navy says the Tic-Tac UFO files could cause "grave damage" to national security if released.

www.space.com...

While that proves nothing really, I think it at least nails it down to two possible things. Black tech or "not ours".. meaning not anyone on this planet. I think revealing more about either of those two possible scenarios would cause grave damage to our national security.. at least, as far as those agencies are concerned.

originally posted by: carewemust
The U.S. Navy says the Tic-Tac UFO files could cause "grave damage" to national security if released.

It means the Tic Tac's are alien.

Info on what might be on the Top Secret Navy UFO Slides

First, the ONI's claim that publication would undermine U.S. "intelligence activities ... as well as the sources and methods that are being used to gather information in support of the national security of the United States."


Here, the ONI is almost certainly referring to active UFO research and analysis programs undertaken by the Navy and other government agencies. Former U.S. government officials involved in those programs have asserted that the UFO research effort is active and growing. I have spoken to other well-informed individuals who assert the same. And, considering that these programs are attempting to ascertain how some UFOs use anti-gravity-enabled means of propulsion to accelerate instantaneously to hypersonic speeds, with little, and sometimes zero, optical/sensor visibility, it's understandable that the ONI would want to keep their research hidden.

www.washingtonexaminer.com...

a reply to: shawmanfromny

all that says to me that the TIC TAC is a US electronic warfare system very similar to the one they used in the 70's called PALLADIUM and the slides that are (TS) would show and explain as much.

that being said i do believe that there are 'others' out there.

originally posted by: spiritualarchitect

originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan
Top-secret UFO files could ‘gravely damage’ US national security, Navy says
Video of an ET craft isn’t going to “gravely damage” US national security.

Top-secret UFO files would cover EVERYTHING. Not just the videos but what is behind the videos. As in where the craft is from, what kind of creature is flying them and how many there are.

Not only that, but where, how and with what the UFOs were recorded.

a reply to: Sublant

the sources and methods excuse many times is used to hide a screw up or a way to say a few white lies.



the TIC-TAC i US made and flown and i would be my life on that


ETA


i bet if you had the ability to monitor US fleet exercised the tic tac would show up in some of the more important ones.


if you are training you Navy's fleet you would want to use all of it when you practice otherwise the people that have to control these aircraft would have zero practice.

For what it's worth, I work with a few gov't agencies on matters that are classified. Not all of my work is classified, and not all of the classified stuff has real gravitas - but some of it does.

In any event, in my experience, I have found that ONI is by far the best intelligence unit of all of the armed services. Their depth & breadth in these areas is far greater than most people realize, and their people are for the most part - top notch. Most people don't know about the Navy's "reach" when it comes to space.

The ONI folks are smart, courteous, professional and many actually have a sense of humor. Which is an absolute requirement in my opinion. I mean, you really can't believe some of the crazy stuff you hear about - it's hilarious. But you need to take it all seriously until it can be vetted. Afterwards, you can and should laugh like hell at some of the crap.

But as always - your mileage may vary, void where prohibited, etc...

BREAKING NEWS:

The U.S. Naval Institute (a very serious academic institute) has a report on the Nimtz Navy UFO/UAP encounter.
This is the story of the century!

"These #UAP sightings remain a mystery. The objects, sighted by credible witnesses and detected and recorded by sophisticated sensors, are so far beyond the frame of reference of contemporary science and technology..."

blog.usni.org...

originally posted by: chunder
I readily admit I haven't read everything about this case but how many did actually see it with their own eyes ?
Which means not via radar or IR or a disturbance of water but actual visual eye contact.

Fravor has said that only the four pilots involved ever personally saw the Tic Tac.

But according to the majority of the witnesses, Fravor is wrong, as a crewmember aboard the Hawkeye said everyone saw the Tic Tac with their own eyes fly by them at close range. That is another 5 aircrewmen right there.

Then we have 2 more, Voorhis and Day who both say they saw the thing using the cruisers sighting devices.

TopGun Intercept Controller Kevin Day says “After this now famous Commander Fravor intercept happened, I went back up into combat and I found one of these things on the radar and I got the relative bearing from the ship. I went up topside and I looked at that thing through the Big Eye binoculars.”

“When they’d show up on radar,” Voorhis says, “I’d get the relative bearing and then run up to the bridge and look through a pair of heavily magnified binoculars in the direction the returns were coming from.” Describing what he saw during the daytime, Voorhis says the objects were too far off to make out any distinguishing features, however, he could clearly see something moving erratically in the distance.

“I couldn’t make out details, but they'd just be hovering there, then all of a sudden, in an instant, they’d dart off to another direction and stop again,” Voorhis says. “At night, they’d give off a kind of a phosphorus glow and were a little easier to see than in the day.”

So the total number of people to actually see the Tic Tac with their own eyes is at 11 minimum.

We also have another possible eye witness, as Underwood claims that Lt. Col "Cheeks" saw the thing with his own eyes, though Cheeks has not admitted this publicly.

originally posted by: celltypespecific
BREAKING NEWS:
blog.usni.org...

What could power the craft and what is the source of the craft propulsion? This is a wide-open area for speculation, and the only thing we can say with any certainty is that they do not use conventional aircraft propulsion. For one, ATFLIR confirms there is no heat-generating internal combustion engine that expels hot air and exhaust gases in a trail behind the aircraft. Not even a scramjet engine—or any other known engine—would allow it to reach speeds of 7,200 miles an hour instantaneously.

Another mystery is that the craft seem to have the ability to hover, fly at amazing speeds, and then come to a quick stop, much faster than vertical-takeoff-and-landing aircraft such as the F-35B. The 2004 “FLIR1” footage shows the object going from a hover to zipping out of the camera field of view faster than any known aircraft. How any object can accomplish this is unknown.

Graves comments that the craft seem to carry an extremely powerful energy source, flying for 12 hours in ways that would require a conventionally powered aircraft to refuel after an hour. This would rule out jet fuel and the small size of the craft seems to rule out nuclear power. One possibility is the use of so-called “zero-point energy,” or the potential energy derived from a vacuum. As for a propulsion system, some speculation has focused on a system that can refract gravity, pushing an object in a direction other than straight downward to Earth.

The UAPs encountered in the 2004 and 2014–15 sightings could be secret, unacknowledged U.S. military aircraft. With what limited knowledge we have, that is the best-case scenario. (Alternately, they could be non-native to Earth, but that possibility creates far more questions than it answers.)

And we would NOT want to go there now would we!