It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Grambler
Enough to shame Vindman and the rest of the witnesses that said he was wrong about everything
Somehow you imagine that the IMF involvement
talkingpointsmemo.com...
Within one week of Yovanovitch’s removal, Lutsenko began to walk back his statements, telling Bloomberg that there was “no evidence” of wrongdoing by the Bidens.
originally posted by: Middleoftheroad
a reply to: Gryphon66
The "transcript " shows the phone call so opinions about it are not hearsay. Also, Lt. Col. Vindman was listening to the call.
You can scream it from the rooftops if you want, but in the end, that's just your opinion. I didn't hear anything but hearsay and that's my opinion. The fact that they chose the Ukraine phone call to try and impeach Trump was a bad idea from the get-go. Trump destroyed the left's narrative when he made an unprecedented strategic move and released the transcript and now the left is in damage control.
originally posted by: Grambler
Ok fine, I don’t see why this matters at all
The defense “well Vindman didn’t comment on that” seems .... strange
But fine, the points clearly point to more than enough reasons to investigate Burisma and the Biden’s, I’m glad bud man and the rest don’t dispute any of these points
Next we can get to proof of Ukrainians election interference, and state dept officials telling Ukrainian prosecutors to drop investigations into Obama allies people
I guess Vindman doesn’t dispute any of this, so great, let’s start the investigations
Here are the relevant items from Solomon’s 28 items that could be said to address Lt. Col. VIndman’s actual claims somewhat:
Fact 22: Then-Ukraine Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko said in a televised interview with me that Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch during a 2016 meeting provided the lists of names of Ukrainian nationals and groups she did want to see prosecuted. You can see I accurately quoted him by watching the video here.
Fact 23: Ambassador Yovanovitch and her embassy denied Lutsenkos claim, calling it a “fabrication.” I reported their reaction here.
originally posted by: Grambler
Solomon accurately quoted him
Even if you don’t think so, to pretend that the evidence Solomon provides that has been ignored this whole time is now not worth looking at proves you aren’t serious about seein the truth
Which is absolutely your right
Some people find it very comforting to ignore facts that don’t fit into their narrative so I totally get it
originally posted by: daskakik
I guess some do but that isn't me. Pointing out the flaw in the OP and thinking this probably isn't going anywhere has nothing to do with some personal narrative that needs protecting.
originally posted by: The GUT
originally posted by: daskakik
I guess some do but that isn't me. Pointing out the flaw in the OP and thinking this probably isn't going anywhere has nothing to do with some personal narrative that needs protecting.
We can tell by the equal time you spend trying to discredit leftist posts.
originally posted by: The GUT
We can tell by the equal time you spend trying to discredit leftist posts.
originally posted by: JBurns
Isn't about the article...
SO today solomon as released a 28 point refutation of Vindmans claim all of his reporting was wrong, and backed every one up with independent source material that you yourself can read.
Please check out his claims for yourself.
Witnesses in the impeachment hearings did the same, including Vindman.
because that is all you all know how to do